Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#265654 3-Feb-2020 21:30
Send private message

Odd question. Bear with me.

 

 

 

The fuel requirement for a new Subaru Forester in the manual says

 

 

 

For Australia: 91 Octane or higher

 

 

 

Except for Australia: 95 Octane or higher is recommended

 

 

 

So...is NZ included in 'Australia' since we tend to share vehicle specs and if it isn't then how is their 91 different?






Create new topic
boosacnoodle
1274 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 858


  #2412124 3-Feb-2020 21:47
Send private message

Apparently Australia's fuel quality is one of the lowest in the OECD, so this may be why. Quite an interesting read actually as it seems Australia, and by extension probably us too, are not getting the most fuel efficient cars due to low fuel quality.

 

Source: https://www.caradvice.com.au/748124/australias-petrol-standards-and-cheap-fuel-to-remain-unchanged-until-2027/ 




Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2412129 3-Feb-2020 22:02
Send private message

I thought we also sold 91 here? Do we not?






Bung
6733 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2926

Subscriber

  #2412131 3-Feb-2020 22:16
Send private message

The NZ brochure lists minimum octane requirement as 91 RON but qualifies the engine performance specs as being obtained on 95 RON as required by Australian Design Rule.



Scott3
4176 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2990

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2412135 3-Feb-2020 22:31
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

Odd question. Bear with me.

 

 

 

The fuel requirement for a new Subaru Forester in the manual says

 

 

 

For Australia: 91 Octane or higher

 

 

 

Except for Australia: 95 Octane or higher is recommended

 

 

 

So...is NZ included in 'Australia' since we tend to share vehicle specs and if it isn't then how is their 91 different?

 



Generally I would say no. Quite often we get different spec cars from Austrailia.

As Examples:

 

  • Previous Generation Outlander is sold with coilover rear suspension in NZ & japan, but separate shocks in USA & Aust.
  • Subaru uses a different badge for the Legacy in Aussie
  • Aussie spec cars often offer a lower base specification than are offered here (hand crank windows etc).

I think a lot of this stems from the presence of used imports from NZ. It is desirable for our spec to match japan where possible. Also little need for Bargen basement new cars here when we can get good used cars from Japan to meet that need.

That said, Subaru NZ clearly are advertising the Forester as having 91 (I assume RON) as the minimum fuel requirement:

https://www.subaru.co.nz/showroom/forester/compare#state=compare&variants=133,137,139

 

 

 

To further complicate the matter, some vehicles have different Minimum fuel grades, to the Recommended fuel grade. My BMW was 91 Min, 95 recommended.


Scott3
4176 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2990

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2412137 3-Feb-2020 22:53
Send private message

Bung: The NZ brochure lists minimum octane requirement as 91 RON but qualifies the engine performance specs as being obtained on 95 RON as required by Australian Design Rule.


Do you think that means that Subaru is required to have 95RON as the recommended fuel everywhere other than Australia as that is what the engine performance specs are quoted running on, But the ADR allows the car to be tested on 95 despite the minimum being 91, leading to the difference in that market?

If that is the case it is a bit deceptive of Subaru NZ to advertise power figures that are unobtainable on the minimum fuel rating in the same spec sheet (linked above). If this is the case, it sounds like if OP wants the advertised performance they need to run 95...


dolsen
1483 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 319

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2412141 3-Feb-2020 23:21
Send private message

boosacnoodle:

Apparently Australia's fuel quality is one of the lowest in the OECD, so this may be why. Quite an interesting read actually as it seems Australia, and by extension probably us too, are not getting the most fuel efficient cars due to low fuel quality.


Source: https://www.caradvice.com.au/748124/australias-petrol-standards-and-cheap-fuel-to-remain-unchanged-until-2027/ 



Nz limit of sulphur is 10ppm from 1 July 2018, so, better than Australia. Doesn't mean that our market is big enough without Australia to get the more efficient cars though.


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dell laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2412219 4-Feb-2020 08:29
Send private message

So, based on all your helpful replies, it’s not terribly clear. It seems that (a) you can safely run the car on 91 but (b) it will run better on 95.

Does that sound about right?

It’s an improvement on the Range Rover it replaced, which was 98 if possible!





Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.