![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
sbiddle:Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Yes Auckland has Cat III ILS which is why most jet services aren't affected.
pdath:Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Of course there are, but they cost money, so only larger planes and airports have them. We don't use big jumbo jets for our little domestic hops within NZ.
Geektastic:pdath:Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Of course there are, but they cost money, so only larger planes and airports have them. We don't use big jumbo jets for our little domestic hops within NZ.
So what if they cost money? Air NZ makes heaps and is supposed to be delivering service to customers...!
Geektastic:pdath:Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Of course there are, but they cost money, so only larger planes and airports have them. We don't use big jumbo jets for our little domestic hops within NZ.
So what if they cost money? Air NZ makes heaps and is supposed to be delivering service to customers...!
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
_____________________________________________________________________
I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies....
Linuxluver:Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.
Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.
aschteev:Linuxluver:Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.
Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.
Actually, the plane lands itself. If you watch on YouTube videos of ILS CAT IIIB approaches, you will hear the auto-pilot disengage AFTER the aircraft has landed and has commenced the roll out.
Airways NZ is the company responsible for the installation, operation and maintenance of the equipment at the airport - lighting (inc approach and runway lighting), navigation aids, radar, radios, arrival approach and departure procedures, and the Multilateration (MLAT) ground radar system. Airways then provides these services to the airlines, and charges them accordingly for these services.
In fog, Auckland can still push up to 20-25 movements an hour (a movement is either a departure or an arrival).
Linuxluver:Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.
Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.
oxnsox:Linuxluver:Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?
Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.
Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.
Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.
Instrument Landing Systems (ILS) that allow aircraft to land autonomously have been around for decades. But there's a high cost both to have an autonomous capable system fitted to an aircraft, and to have the approriate ground systems installed at an airfield.
Generally the airfield costs can only be justified at larger airports with higher air traffic movements, and if you've only got a few airports fitted with high end ILS then as an airline you'd only justify the cost of fitting gear to the aircraft that use those exclusively.
And that's really the limitation, most airports don't have the ILS equipment, and if they did their usage charges would be ridiculously high for the usage it would get.
Finally, whilst it's been possible to land hands-free for a long time the next limitation can be to get the aircraft from the runway to the terminal. In fog thepilot maynot be able to see where to go, being higher off the ground in fog may mean they can't see, a follow-me vehicle, taxiway markings, signboards for turnoffs (which are off to the side of the runway), or even the terminal. But probably most importantly they maynot be able to see their own wingtips or other aircraft on the ground.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |