AirNZ Today 2015-09-14

Forums › Travel (planes, train, cruise) › AirNZ Today 2015-09-14

1 | 2 | 3

30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod

Trusted

Biddle Corp

Lifetime subscriber

#1387712 15-Sep-2015 10:33

Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Yes Auckland has Cat III ILS which is why most jet services aren't affected.

Jase2985

13735 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6212

ID Verified

Lifetime subscriber

#1387722 15-Sep-2015 10:37

sbiddle:
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Yes Auckland has Cat III ILS which is why most jet services aren't affected.

key word in bold there, most affected services were turbo prop ones

Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1387843 15-Sep-2015 12:49

pdath:
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Of course there are, but they cost money, so only larger planes and airports have them. We don't use big jumbo jets for our little domestic hops within NZ.

So what if they cost money? Air NZ makes heaps and is supposed to be delivering service to customers...!

pdath

253 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 116

#1387846 15-Sep-2015 12:51

Geektastic:
pdath:
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Of course there are, but they cost money, so only larger planes and airports have them. We don't use big jumbo jets for our little domestic hops within NZ.

So what if they cost money? Air NZ makes heaps and is supposed to be delivering service to customers...!

Air NZ is a publicly listed company and as such its primary goal is to deliver a return to its shareholders.

Try my latest project, a Cisco type 5 enable secret password cracker written in javascript!

empacher48

376 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 283

#1387847 15-Sep-2015 12:52

It's not AirNZ who spends the money, that is up to Airways or Auckland Airport, who will then charge whatever they want to for the use.

They won't care if your flight costs an extra $200

Jase2985

13735 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6212

ID Verified

Lifetime subscriber

#1387853 15-Sep-2015 13:03

Geektastic:
pdath:
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Of course there are, but they cost money, so only larger planes and airports have them. We don't use big jumbo jets for our little domestic hops within NZ.

So what if they cost money? Air NZ makes heaps and is supposed to be delivering service to customers...!

where do you plan on fitting them in the small planes? who do you propose certifies them etc etc etc

for ~10 days a year if that its not even worth it

Lenovo

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

1eStar

1604 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 375

#1387924 15-Sep-2015 15:32

Every day of the year(-1) you can fly to Nelson on a turbo prop, no security check, just breeze through. One day a year there's fog in Auckland and you wish there was a jet service which could land in fog. Long live the turbo props.

MikeB4

MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12767

ID Verified

Trusted

Subscriber

#1387940 15-Sep-2015 15:49

Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

"closed every five minutes " hmmm from memory Auckland is closed circa 5-10 times per year. Wellington less than five and generally any closure is short lived with the exception of the very rare times fog last for longer than a few hours.

Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.

Linuxluver

5833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1639

Trusted

Subscriber

#1387990 15-Sep-2015 17:00

Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.

Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.

_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies....

aschteev

80 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 6

#1388212 15-Sep-2015 21:36

Linuxluver:
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.

Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.

Actually, the plane lands itself. If you watch on YouTube videos of ILS CAT IIIB approaches, you will hear the auto-pilot disengage AFTER the aircraft has landed and has commenced the roll out.

Airways NZ is the company responsible for the installation, operation and maintenance of the equipment at the airport - lighting (inc approach and runway lighting), navigation aids, radar, radios, arrival approach and departure procedures, and the Multilateration (MLAT) ground radar system. Airways then provides these services to the airlines, and charges them accordingly for these services.

In fog, Auckland can still push up to 20-25 movements an hour (a movement is either a departure or an arrival).

Case: OverclockersNZ Cobra Blue ATX CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40Ghz Motherboard: ASUS StrikerExtreme RAM: 2x 2x1GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800 (4GB total) Video: Leadtek Winfast PX8800GTX TDH Hard Drives: 4x Seagate 320GB SATAII

Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1388280 15-Sep-2015 22:32

aschteev:
Linuxluver:
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.

Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.

Actually, the plane lands itself. If you watch on YouTube videos of ILS CAT IIIB approaches, you will hear the auto-pilot disengage AFTER the aircraft has landed and has commenced the roll out.

Airways NZ is the company responsible for the installation, operation and maintenance of the equipment at the airport - lighting (inc approach and runway lighting), navigation aids, radar, radios, arrival approach and departure procedures, and the Multilateration (MLAT) ground radar system. Airways then provides these services to the airlines, and charges them accordingly for these services.

In fog, Auckland can still push up to 20-25 movements an hour (a movement is either a departure or an arrival).

Yes, a friend of mine is a pilot for BA and he describes his job as "mostly watching out to make sure the machines don't make a mistake these days!"

Apple TV

Stream your favourite shows now on Apple TV (affiliate link).

Oblivian

7345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2117

ID Verified

#1388284 15-Sep-2015 22:42

Want to change heading or speed.. turn ze dial and let er do the rest :)

oxnsox

1923 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 138

#1388747 16-Sep-2015 22:22

Linuxluver:
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.

Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.

Instrument Landing Systems (ILS) that allow aircraft to land autonomously have been around for decades. But there's a high cost both to have an autonomous capable system fitted to an aircraft, and to have the approriate ground systems installed at an airfield.

Generally the airfield costs can only be justified at larger airports with higher air traffic movements, and if you've only got a few airports fitted with high end ILS then as an airline you'd only justify the cost of fitting gear to the aircraft that use those exclusively.

And that's really the limitation, most airports don't have the ILS equipment, and if they did their usage charges would be ridiculously high for the usage it would get.

Finally, whilst it's been possible to land hands-free for a long time the next limitation can be to get the aircraft from the runway to the terminal. In fog thepilot maynot be able to see where to go, being higher off the ground in fog may mean they can't see, a follow-me vehicle, taxiway markings, signboards for turnoffs (which are off to the side of the runway), or even the terminal. But probably most importantly they maynot be able to see their own wingtips or other aircraft on the ground.

Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1388814 17-Sep-2015 08:34

oxnsox:
Linuxluver:
Geektastic: Surely there are avionics and matching ground systems that allow planes to operate in fog?

Plenty of cities in the world get lots of fog and their airports are not closed every five minutes because of it.

Planes operate just fine in fog. It's the bit where the wheels have to touch the ground that causes all the trouble. Instruments will get you very close to the runway and at the right approach angle, but the pilot still needs to be able to see the runway for that last, most important bit.

Otherwise we wouldn't need pilots.

Instrument Landing Systems (ILS) that allow aircraft to land autonomously have been around for decades. But there's a high cost both to have an autonomous capable system fitted to an aircraft, and to have the approriate ground systems installed at an airfield.

Generally the airfield costs can only be justified at larger airports with higher air traffic movements, and if you've only got a few airports fitted with high end ILS then as an airline you'd only justify the cost of fitting gear to the aircraft that use those exclusively.

And that's really the limitation, most airports don't have the ILS equipment, and if they did their usage charges would be ridiculously high for the usage it would get.

Finally, whilst it's been possible to land hands-free for a long time the next limitation can be to get the aircraft from the runway to the terminal. In fog thepilot maynot be able to see where to go, being higher off the ground in fog may mean they can't see, a follow-me vehicle, taxiway markings, signboards for turnoffs (which are off to the side of the runway), or even the terminal. But probably most importantly they maynot be able to see their own wingtips or other aircraft on the ground.

As regards to direction, I suggest some sort of transponders embedded in the runway or on the edges of it could create a system which the plane can follow - like permanent 'waypoints' on a map.

MikeB4

MikeB4
18776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12767

ID Verified

Trusted

Subscriber

#1388819 17-Sep-2015 09:05

I am sure all sorts of solutions are available if we had the population numbers to support them and people willing to pay for them.

Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.

1 | 2 | 3