Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
empacher48
368 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2327541 1-Oct-2019 11:12
Send private message

I don’t see what the big problem is. I’ve been flying when the Airways Control Centre has been evacuated. They instigate TIBA (Traffic Information Broadcasts from Aircraft), so all aircraft flying in a certain area transfer across to another frequency that is monitored by a local control tower.

 

We broadcast our position and intentions and go back to basics and seperate ourselves from the other traffic and land at our destinations. It really isn’t that hard, you just talk directly to the other aircraft to find out who is around you and manage your climb or descent with the other aircraft around you. We get far more complex problems to deal with in the simulator training every 6 months. It’s just that once we land, we can’t depart until things are operational again.

 

Unfortunately, aviation is a victim of its own success. It has become so reliable that passengers don’t realise the hundreds of things that have to go right to get a flight away successfully. But do notice when one of the big ones fails. As I tell my crew when we start work each day, the schedule is just a guideline, we only depart when we are ready and I’ll put the park brake on and stop immediately if anyone has any concerns. Frankly, Getting you there on time always comes second to getting there alive.

 

So to those who want to eliminate the whole risk out of Airways, where would you put the control centres? Anywhere South of the Manawatu is a high risk of earthquakes, North of the Manawatu has volcanoes, the Manawatu has farmers and contractors who cut the Airways Fibre Link (that cable has been cut three times in five years, there was one outage where both the primary and secondary cables were cut in different places at the same time, so why don’t be build 3 or 4 or 765 cables just in case they get cut?).

 

 

 

 




Technofreak
6530 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2327548 1-Oct-2019 11:25
Send private message

frankv:

 

Any kind of diversion is not possible unless ATC is there to command it, and to control the traffic to and arrivals at the regional airport. So diverting aircraft to another airport isn't going to help... in fact, it probably means that several large aircraft are sent to a common point, and what's more a point where there are probably aircraft that aren't ADSB-equipped.

 

Without ADSB and therefore TCAS, which allows the pilots to know where other ADSB-equipped aircraft are, loss of ATC is potentially catastrophic. At the point of ATC failure, two aircraft may be moving towards a collision, and neither may be able to see the other in time to avoid it. The best thing that could be done would be to command all aircraft to orbit exactly where they are.

 

 

I think you are getting confused about various technologies. TCAS does not rely on an aircraft being equipped with ADSB. TCAS relies on Mode C transponders and all aircraft operating in controlled airspace have to have an operative Mode C transponder or better. To that effect all transport category aircraft I know of have two transponders to ensure redundancy in this regard.

 

So far as arrivals at regional airports go, any ATC service if there is one provided at that airport, is done by the local control tower.

 

Even though the tower controllers are not rated to provide a service using a radar signal, in most cases the tower has a feed of the radar signal to enhance situational awareness. It's my guess in an emergency they would use this information to avoid an accident.

 

At many regional airfields there is no ATC service what so ever and the arriving/departing aircraft work out their own separation to avoid conflict.

 

 

 

P.S. See that above post to see how things are handled  in an en-route situation when ATC go off the air.





Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


Oblivian
7297 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

  #2327551 1-Oct-2019 11:28
Send private message

For some clarity of those who did not watch the Airways 4pm media release yesterday.

 

It wasn't just an evacuation. The secondary UPS failed, and let the magic smoke out. Triggering both a redundancy fallover to the secondary or manual/backup as described (with limited plate board control from towers no doubt). AND a building evacuation of those that do the controlling due to the smoke.

 

Had it been just an evac (happened before) less impact would likely have been felt outside a 'hold until we get ontop of manual boards again'. But this took a bit longer, and required the shutdown of some systems and fail-over.

 

 

 

No pretty screens to look at to pre-plan separation and flight levels makes for fun times with avoidance in built up airspace and keeping track on where everything is




dejadeadnz
2394 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #2329334 4-Oct-2019 00:36
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

yes I did consider this. So, would you be willing to pay a surcharge on air travel to fund redundancy?

 

 

I don't pretend to know the detailed breakdown of where each dollar of one's airfare goes to in NZ but in the likes of the US, typically taxes and non-airport charges make up to 20% of the cost of each flight. Unless you have better evidence, I think it's safe to assume that NZ is broadly comparable. It's hard to believe that radar redundancy would itself make up a sizable part of such a percentage of each air ticket that the NZ govt would immediately look to recover in one giant whack, as opposed to spreading the costs out over time. I further note that your previous interlocutor's point about redundancy previously being in place and its disappearance not having led to any price decrease was, as usual, met by another feeble one-liner from you.

 

In any event, given that air travel is seen as so desirable by many people in business and a luxury for which many are prepared to pay a considerable amount, it's hard to imagine that too many people will be jumping up and down to quibble over, say, a few dollars extra on each flight. Furthermore, you might like to have a look at the number of passenger movements in NZ's international airports in 2019 (i.e. nearly 14 million - source). A couple of bucks extra for each trip would go quite a long way each year, especially when any capital investments will be amortised over many-a-year.

 

 

 

[Mod edit (MF): post edited to remove last off topic paragraph).


old3eyes
9120 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #2329356 4-Oct-2019 07:37
Send private message

Looks like centralized train control doesn't look like a good idea after yesterday.




Regards,

Old3eyes


neb

neb
11294 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2331509 6-Oct-2019 17:19
Send private message

Technofreak:

ADSB and multilateration are just a replacement for the the old tech spinning SSR radar heads that will be decommissioned.

 

 

One thing about ADSB is that using it relies on single every aircraft in the sky having it enabled and operating correctly. Ground-based radar isn't dependent on this. So I'd use ADSB as a backup for radar, but not as the primary indicator for air traffic.

empacher48
368 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2331510 6-Oct-2019 17:29
Send private message

neb:

One thing about ADSB is that using it relies on single every aircraft in the sky having it enabled and operating correctly. Ground-based radar isn't dependent on this. So I'd use ADSB as a backup for radar, but not as the primary indicator for air traffic.


In the case discussed here, the radar worked. The signals from everyone’s transponder was being received by the SSR’s around the country, so was the MLAT signals from down south. However the centre was at fault. It wouldn’t matter if there was ADS-B because that will still run into the same system fault as SSR and MLAT.

ADS-C may have helped. But we’re talking hundreds of thousands of dollars per aircraft to be fitted.

MLAT: Mutli-Lateration, basically radar without a radar head, cheaper to implement and only requires an aircraft to be fitted with a Mode S transponder.
ADS-B: Automatic Dependant Surveillance - Broadcast. The aircraft transmit their position to receivers on the ground.
ADS-C: Automatic Dependant Surveillance - Communication. Does the same as ADS-B but information such as clearances and traffic information can be communicated to the aircraft without the need for voice communication.

 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
frankv
5680 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2331674 7-Oct-2019 07:32
Send private message

neb:
Technofreak:

 

ADSB and multilateration are just a replacement for the the old tech spinning SSR radar heads that will be decommissioned.

 

One thing about ADSB is that using it relies on single every aircraft in the sky having it enabled and operating correctly. Ground-based radar isn't dependent on this. So I'd use ADSB as a backup for radar, but not as the primary indicator for air traffic.

 

Ground-based radar in NZ isn't really radar. I'm pretty sure that the primary radar has already been decommissioned. What we have now is dependent on aircraft having transponders (currently Mode C, but the transition to Mode S is underway). So we already rely on aircraft being transponder-equipped. And on the Mk1 eyeball.

 

 


Technofreak
6530 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2332225 7-Oct-2019 20:54
Send private message

neb:
Technofreak:

 

ADSB and multilateration are just a replacement for the the old tech spinning SSR radar heads that will be decommissioned.

 

One thing about ADSB is that using it relies on single every aircraft in the sky having it enabled and operating correctly. Ground-based radar isn't dependent on this. So I'd use ADSB as a backup for radar, but not as the primary indicator for air traffic.

 

ADSB is the replacement for radar. ADSB is no more reliant on an aircraft being equipped with a Mode S transponder than the current Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) is reliant on a Mode C transponder. All aircraft that wish to operate inside Controlled Airspace now must have at least a Mode C transponder, before too long the minimum requirement will be a Mode S transponder.

 

ADSB is not going to be a back up for SSR, it replaces SSR.

 

Due to the technologies they use ADSB and SSR have a much greater range than PSR. This is why they are the primary source of "radar" information to ATC.





Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


Technofreak
6530 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2332235 7-Oct-2019 21:04
Send private message

frankv:

 

Ground-based radar in NZ isn't really radar. I'm pretty sure that the primary radar has already been decommissioned. What we have now is dependent on aircraft having transponders (currently Mode C, but the transition to Mode S is underway). So we already rely on aircraft being transponder-equipped. And on the Mk1 eyeball.

 

 

Ground based radar in New Zealand at the current time comprises both Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) and Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR). There are PSR heads at Auckland Wellington and Christchurch. These are used for backup purposes. It's my understanding PSR will still be used as a back up once SSR is replaced by ADSB. Primary radar has the advantage it can still "paint" a target that isn't equipped with a transponder or has had a transponder failure.





Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.