Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Batman

Mad Scientist
29765 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#319051 17-Mar-2025 21:48
Send private message

So I read the stranded astronauts are about to come back to earth thanks to Space X.

 

How did this guy do something in half a year that other people can't?


Create new topic

This is a filtered page: currently showing replies marked as answers. Click here to see full discussion.

ezbee
2405 posts

Uber Geek


  #3354708 17-Mar-2025 23:03
Send private message


The Crew Capsule was a NASA let and funded project.
SpaceX recieved significant technolgy transfer from NASA, and resources from NASA.
This is without considering NASA contribution to the launch vehicle as well.

 

Key Funding Rounds:

 

🚀 2010 – SpaceX received $75 million from NASA for early design work.
🚀 2011-2014 – NASA awarded $440 million under Commercial Crew Integrated Capability (CCiCap).
🚀 2014-2020 – NASA gave SpaceX $2.6 billion in a fixed-price contract to develop and certify Crew Dragon for crewed missions.
🚀 Total NASA funding to SpaceX for Crew Dragon: Over $3.1 billion.

 

On Technology side :

 

✔ Heat Shield Tech – NASA shared expertise on PICA-X, an improved version of NASA’s own PICA (Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator), used on Mars missions.
✔ Parachute Systems – NASA worked with SpaceX to develop Crew Dragon’s parachutes, which initially failed multiple tests. ( Key point Elon's cost cutting caused problems that NASA had to come in to help after faiures, though there may still be issues with Elon not fully embacing not-invented-here ) 
✔ Life Support & Environmental Control – NASA engineers helped SpaceX develop COâ‚‚ scrubbers, oxygen supply, and air circulation systems.
✔ Human-Rating Safety Standards – SpaceX had no experience with crewed spacecraft, so NASA guided them through rigorous safety requirements.

 

Well to a degree Elon had to be saved from CyberTrucking it by NASA.

 

✔ Parachutes failed → NASA forced a redesign.
✔ Abort system exploded → NASA forced a safer design.
✔ Touchscreens were impractical → NASA required physical buttons. 
✔ Rushed schedules ignored safety → NASA slowed things down.


Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.