Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




2091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1219


Topic # 220212 31-Jul-2017 19:37
Send private message

I heard that Sydney terrorist were contemplating or building a device with poisonous gas for use on a plane.

While this may kill all the passengers (including the terrorist), it would be ineffective on the crew, right?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3910048/Toxic-cabin-fumes-POISON-plane-passengers-oxygen-masks-no-protection-warns-BA-s-flight-safety-chief.html

"The head of in-flight safety for British Airways has admitted that passengers can be 'incapacitated' by toxic fumes on planes.

Mark Mannering-Smith reportedly wrote on an internal online forum that cabin fumes can be toxic and therefore hurt crew and travellers.

His comments which were posted on the internet have since been deleted, but were saved by BA staff, reports The Sun on Sunday.

Mr Mannering-Smith wrote staff members can wear protective gear called smoke hoods, which are similar to gas masks, 'regardless of customer perception'.

Customers on board the flight will not have the same protection by using the oxygen masks which drop down during an emergency, according to the paper.

A senior BA source told the newspaper's Stephen Moyes: 'Oxygen comes from tanks in the hold.

'But the masks they use are designed to allow cabin air in so they do not provide protection from fumes.'"


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
5637 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834506 31-Jul-2017 19:37
2 people support this post
Send private message

Allow me to introduce you folks to our new travel community: TravelTalk NZ.

 

We hope to see you there!

 





I am the Geekzone Robot and I am here to help. I am from the Internet. I do not interact. Do not expect other replies from me.



500 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 302


  Reply # 1834541 31-Jul-2017 21:16
5 people support this post
Send private message

You're on a list.

 
 
 
 


5637 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834563 31-Jul-2017 22:24
3 people support this post
Send private message

While this may kill all the passengers (including the terrorist), it would be ineffective on the crew, right?

 

As the internet has taught me, snakes are highly effective at eradicating humans.





I am the Geekzone Robot and I am here to help. I am from the Internet. I do not interact. Do not expect other replies from me.



Mad Scientist
20005 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2714

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834572 31-Jul-2017 23:11
Send private message

@PeterReader:

 

While this may kill all the passengers (including the terrorist), it would be ineffective on the crew, right?

 

As the internet has taught me, snakes are highly effective at eradicating humans.

 

 

Unless you know 2 very simple swear words and you use it repeatedly the snakes will all die.





Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


Mr Snotty
8523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4421

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834574 31-Jul-2017 23:14
Send private message

@Batman:

 

Unless you know 2 very simple swear words and you use it repeatedly the snakes will all die.

 

Stop giving the bot ideas :)

 

I honestly think this is a terrible idea. Wouldn't it be easier to arm all the staff with tasers or something?





3261 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1051

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834628 1-Aug-2017 06:33
One person supports this post
Send private message

Effective? Very probably. I wouldn't want to find out.


708 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 308

Subscriber

  Reply # 1834641 1-Aug-2017 07:41
2 people support this post
Send private message

Arab Terrorists avenging US interference in the middle East by gassing everyone on a plane? Hmm.. that was "The Lion's Game" by Nelson DeMille


BDFL - Memuneh
63052 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 13630

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834677 1-Aug-2017 09:03
Send private message

PeterReader:

 

While this may kill all the passengers (including the terrorist), it would be ineffective on the crew, right?

 

As the internet has taught me, snakes are highly effective at eradicating humans.

 

 

A gas attack would be ineffective against robot pilots.





2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 970

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834711 1-Aug-2017 09:23
Send private message

Sidestep:

 

Arab Terrorists avenging US interference in the middle East by gassing everyone on a plane? Hmm.. that was "The Lion's Game" by Nelson DeMille

 

 

Yep. Good book by the way - as were all the Corey series IMHO.

 

 

 

 


896 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 551


  Reply # 1834799 1-Aug-2017 11:01
3 people support this post
Send private message

 

kingdragonfly: I heard that Sydney terrorist were contemplating or building a device with poisonous gas for use on a plane.

While this may kill all the passengers (including the terrorist), it would be ineffective on the crew, right?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3910048/Toxic-cabin-fumes-POISON-plane-passengers-oxygen-masks-no-protection-warns-BA-s-flight-safety-chief.html

"The head of in-flight safety for British Airways has admitted that passengers can be 'incapacitated' by toxic fumes on planes.

Mark Mannering-Smith reportedly wrote on an internal online forum that cabin fumes can be toxic and therefore hurt crew and travellers.

His comments which were posted on the internet have since been deleted, but were saved by BA staff, reports The Sun on Sunday.

Mr Mannering-Smith wrote staff members can wear protective gear called smoke hoods, which are similar to gas masks, 'regardless of customer perception'.

Customers on board the flight will not have the same protection by using the oxygen masks which drop down during an emergency, according to the paper.

A senior BA source told the newspaper's Stephen Moyes: 'Oxygen comes from tanks in the hold.

'But the masks they use are designed to allow cabin air in so they do not provide protection from fumes.'"

 

The Pilots have oxygen systems that enable them to breath 100% bottle oxygen with hours of oxygen supply, which enables them to function at a high level in a depressurised/fume/smoke filled cabin and could theoretically survive a gas attack if they were to don the masks before the gas gets to them. But think about when you accidentally catch a wiff of oven cleaner and multiply it by 1,000. One breath could be all it takes.

 

The cabin crew have oxygen masks similar to passengers which supplement cabin air with addition oxygen. Cabin crew do have smoke hoods which are designed to proved a few minutes of smoke and fume protection but most designs do not exclude 100% of cabin air.

 

Passenger masks provide 7 minutes supplementary oxygen -  they mix with cabin air are designed to provide sufficient oxygen in a high altitude depressurisation to keep passengers alive & free from brain damage  while the aircraft descends to an altitude at which humans can breath properly. Oxygen n flows through that little hose not much faster than fish tank bubbler and the flow is barely perceptible - it certainly doesn't rush out. They are not designed to enable passengers to breath in a smoke/fume/gas filled environment. The masks are deployed automatically if the cabin altitude rises beyond 14,000 feet (normal cabin altitude is around 7-8,000 feet depending on model of aircraft), or if the pilot manually deploys them.

 

The cabin air is completely replaced every 3 to 4 minutes so such a gas would quickly be purged from the aircraft. The problem is that if the crew have not been trained for a gas attack they may fail to identity the problem and don their emergency gear in time. If the flight crew were do correctly diagnose a gas attack they could take corrective action to help speed up purging of the gas out of the aircraft such as manually depressurising the aircraft to near instantly dump 1/2 the cabin air (and gas) overboard, or select full hot cabin temperature which increases the volume of air flowing into the cabin on bleed air feed air-con systems. I won't speculate on how a terrorist could optimise such an attack.

 

 


Mad Scientist
20005 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2714

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834815 1-Aug-2017 11:10
Send private message

They have equipment to deliver 100% oxygen for 6 hours?




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


896 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 551


  Reply # 1834836 1-Aug-2017 11:33
Send private message

Batman: They have equipment to deliver 100% oxygen for 6 hours?

 

Nope.


Mad Scientist
20005 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2714

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1834871 1-Aug-2017 12:25
Send private message

tripper1000:

Batman: They have equipment to deliver 100% oxygen for 6 hours?


Nope.



Eh you said they did?




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


896 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 551


  Reply # 1834889 1-Aug-2017 13:02
One person supports this post
Send private message

Batman:
tripper1000:

 

Batman: They have equipment to deliver 100% oxygen for 6 hours?

 

 

 

Nope.

 



Eh you said they did?

 

I didn't say six hours.

 

Such a duration is not require as the majority of modern aircraft are twin jets and never legally that far from an airport.

 

It's been too long for me to remember and quote the exact times sorry.

 

The flight deck 02 bottle on a typical Boeing is about the size of a Scuba bottle, and pressurised to 1800 psi. Consumption rate is slower than a scuba diver because a divers consumption doubles with every 10 meters of depth, where as it goes the other way with an aircraft - consumption (@100%) drops with increasing altitude.


896 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 551


  Reply # 1834897 1-Aug-2017 13:15
2 people support this post
Send private message

Here you go, I got off my chuff and looked it up.

 

2 Hours per crew member is the required duration for certification by FAA/DOT.

 

Link


 1 | 2 | 3
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

NZ and France seek to end use of social media for acts of terrorism
Posted 24-Apr-2019 12:13


Intel introduces the 9th Gen Intel Core mobile processors
Posted 24-Apr-2019 12:03


Spark partners with OPPO to bring new AX5s smartphone to New Zealand
Posted 24-Apr-2019 09:54


Orcon announces new always-on internet service for Small Business
Posted 18-Apr-2019 10:19


Spark Sport prices for Rugby World Cup 2019 announced
Posted 16-Apr-2019 07:58


2degrees launches new unlimited mobile plan
Posted 15-Apr-2019 09:35


Redgate brings together major industry speakers for SQL in the City Summits
Posted 13-Apr-2019 12:35


Exported honey authenticated on Blockchain
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:19


HPE and Nutanix partner to deliver hybrid cloud as a service
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:12


Southern Cross and ASN sign contract for Southern Cross NEXT
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:09


Data security top New Zealand consumer priority when choosing a bank
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:07


Samsung announces first 8K screens to hit New Zealand
Posted 10-Apr-2019 21:03


New cyber-protection and insurance product for businesses launched in APAC
Posted 10-Apr-2019 20:59


Kiwis ensure streaming is never interrupted by opting for uncapped broadband plans
Posted 7-Apr-2019 09:05


DHL Express introduces new MyDHL+ online portal to make shipping easier
Posted 7-Apr-2019 08:51



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.