Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification



Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | ... | 182
wsnz
649 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2259126 16-Jun-2019 14:57
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

What its a "Welling Budget" ?  

 

What does it achieve? Most people are aware that NZ has a poor record with mental health, suicide, etc. And other sectors particularly our indigenous people. If a budget seeks to address and improve this, I have no issue. Its needed in our society, that's very clear.

 

Most people are aware? But are they? And is there an actual crisis as claimed by Jacinda, or is this another example of her Trumpisms - declare a fire, put the fire out, then claim credit?
Are there mental health issues in NZ, and do they need additional funding? Most likely.  But does it actually require a specialised budget? Without solid quantifiable evidence, it can't be justified.

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

As to the title, its a wake up call, not line 20 on page 4 of a Government document. Mental health service parent the only needy demographic, there are others, so this budget, while there was much other non social discretionary spending, its good to have a theme, to show us all that its a big deal. Well it is to me.

 

Previous budgets have always clearly highlighted areas whether further spending is required, rather than burying them in a larger report. Generalised reports might, but this post is specifically about the budget.

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

Happiness? Im not affected by wellbeing measures, so my happiness metric doesn't change. Although as I have a family member who will benefit, along with MANY others in NZ, I guess my happiness metric increases.

 

 

From my interpretation of the budget criteria, everyone is effected by wellbeing measures. The budget indicated mental health, child wellbeing, Support Maori and Pasifika aspiration , productivity, transforming the economy and investing in NZ as areas for wellbeing.

 

tdgeek: There isn't a need to continue it, its a boost. Hence it was named.

 

Grant Roberson's own speech noted "In this first Wellbeing Budget our priorities are tackling long-term challenges facing New Zealand. "
So it's likely we'll see further wellbeing budgets.

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

If you need updates you can use GDP. Thats tells us the economy of our country. But it doesnt. Its a poor measure. So, no real need for an update, if we watch the news we will, over time, be aware of updates in the "well-being"sectors

 

 

There is a very necessary need for an update. If a budget is to be highly targeted at a group, then we need to be able to quantify the results. To that end Treasury has completed a framework (apparently based on an OECD one) that has created quantifiable variables. If we do not see any updates, then that work was wasted, and we cannot verify whether the government's expenditure was effective.

 

A Living Standards Framework (LSF) dashboard has appeared on the Treasury website, so perhaps this is the fabled updated mechanism? We'll have to wait and see.

 

tdgeek:

 

Still unsure the reason for your post

 

 

Inspired by the post above mine whose topic was the wellbeing budget.




tdgeek
29740 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2259221 16-Jun-2019 18:58
Send private message

wsnz:

 

tdgeek:

 

What its a "Welling Budget" ?  

 

What does it achieve? Most people are aware that NZ has a poor record with mental health, suicide, etc. And other sectors particularly our indigenous people. If a budget seeks to address and improve this, I have no issue. Its needed in our society, that's very clear.

 

Most people are aware? But are they? And is there an actual crisis as claimed by Jacinda, or is this another example of her Trumpisms - declare a fire, put the fire out, then claim credit?
Are there mental health issues in NZ, and do they need additional funding? Most likely.  But does it actually require a specialised budget? Without solid quantifiable evidence, it can't be justified.

 

Its not a specialist budget. Like ALL budgets MOST of the expenditure is standard, operating expenditure. There is a small amount of discretionary spending. You could give that as tax cuts (in 2016 election year) or you could say that there are many of us that are vulnerable. Or you could just ignore those.

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

As to the title, its a wake up call, not line 20 on page 4 of a Government document. Mental health service parent the only needy demographic, there are others, so this budget, while there was much other non social discretionary spending, its good to have a theme, to show us all that its a big deal. Well it is to me.

 

Previous budgets have always clearly highlighted areas whether further spending is required, rather than burying them in a larger report. Generalised reports might, but this post is specifically about the budget.

 

Makes no sense, sorry

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

Happiness? Im not affected by wellbeing measures, so my happiness metric doesn't change. Although as I have a family member who will benefit, along with MANY others in NZ, I guess my happiness metric increases.

 

 

From my interpretation of the budget criteria, everyone is effected by wellbeing measures. The budget indicated mental health, child wellbeing, Support Maori and Pasifika aspiration , productivity, transforming the economy and investing in NZ as areas for wellbeing.

 

tdgeek: There isn't a need to continue it, its a boost. Hence it was named.

 

Grant Roberson's own speech noted "In this first Wellbeing Budget our priorities are tackling long-term challenges facing New Zealand. "
So it's likely we'll see further wellbeing budgets.

 

Rubbish. NZ has many challenges. 

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

If you need updates you can use GDP. Thats tells us the economy of our country. But it doesnt. Its a poor measure. So, no real need for an update, if we watch the news we will, over time, be aware of updates in the "well-being"sectors

 

 

There is a very necessary need for an update. If a budget is to be highly targeted at a group, then we need to be able to quantify the results. To that end Treasury has completed a framework (apparently based on an OECD one) that has created quantifiable variables. If we do not see any updates, then that work was wasted, and we cannot verify whether the government's expenditure was effective.

 

A Living Standards Framework (LSF) dashboard has appeared on the Treasury website, so perhaps this is the fabled updated mechanism? We'll have to wait and see.

 

Fabled??? You can use GDP, which as we all know is a waste of time. As far as social measures go, OECD is worthwhile. 

 

tdgeek:

 

Still unsure the reason for your post

 

 

Inspired by the post above mine whose topic was the wellbeing budget.

 

No, it seems  more of an anti Govt post, which is fine, just don't hide it. tf you feel that Govt performance does not involve the happiness or safety, or ability of some of the public to be part of society, just state that.

 

 

Sad state of affairs. 


wsnz
649 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2261797 21-Jun-2019 09:20
Send private message

By the Government's own admission it's a specialist budget. That's why they renamed to a "Welling Budget" focusing on a specific set of objectives.  These could easily have been addressed without adding a sensational headline.​

 

 

 

As to your assertion that "NZ has many challenges" , it's not clear what you're arguing about. Grant Roberson's own speech noted "In this first Wellbeing Budget our priorities are tackling long-term challenges facing New Zealand." So it's likely we'll see further wellbeing budgets, which is exactly the point being made. 

 

 

 

Neither is it clear why you're referring back to GDP as a measure, when I specifically stated this was about the framework the Government was seeking to use to evaluate progress. Is this the LSF? Who knows, because it hasn't clearly been articulated.

 

 

 

Disagreeing with these elements of recent Government policy/actions doesn't equate to having an anti-Government rant. It really will be a sad state of affairs if that's where the bar is to be set.




tdgeek
29740 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2261799 21-Jun-2019 09:24
Send private message

Fine


Bluntz
29 posts

Geek
Inactive user


  #2261816 21-Jun-2019 10:07
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

Fine

 

 

Another great post. 


tdgeek
29740 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2261820 21-Jun-2019 10:17
Send private message

Bluntz:

 

tdgeek:

 

Fine

 

 

Another great post. 

 

 

Why would anyone bother posting after a such an anti Govt rant? Its fine if he wishes to vent. I acknowledged his post rather than ignoring it

 

No matter what anyone says, a rant is rant, and thats fine


wsnz
649 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2261923 21-Jun-2019 12:28
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

Why would anyone bother posting after a such an anti Govt rant? Its fine if he wishes to vent. I acknowledged his post rather than ignoring it

 

No matter what anyone says, a rant is rant, and thats fine

 

 

The points I disagree with are clearly laid out, and you're welcome to rebut them. Your response is very out of character. Never mind, we'll move on now.


 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
tdgeek
29740 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2261936 21-Jun-2019 13:02
Send private message

Ok, it came across to me as rantworthy

 

By the Government's own admission it's a specialist budget. That's why they renamed to a "Welling Budget" focusing on a specific set of objectives.  These could easily have been addressed without adding a sensational headline.​

 

Its not sensationalist. Budgets usually cover a wide range of stuff, this does as well, but does place a focus on well being.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As to your assertion that "NZ has many challenges" , it's not clear what you're arguing about. Grant Roberson's own speech noted "In this first Wellbeing Budget our priorities are tackling long-term challenges facing New Zealand." So it's likely we'll see further wellbeing budgets, which is exactly the point being made. 

 

NZ has many challenges, always will. Every topic needs more money. This budget focussed more on social issues, which like everything else, has challenges. They decided it was a priority, thats all   There is no implication that every budget will be a Well Being budget. It may well be transport, it may well be climate change, it may well be a non themed budget

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neither is it clear why you're referring back to GDP as a measure, when I specifically stated this was about the framework the Government was seeking to use to evaluate progress. Is this the LSF? Who knows, because it hasn't clearly been articulated.

 

GDP is a measure, that how we decide how well we are going but its heavily flawed. The state of he well being metrics shows that. Its flawed when evaluating economics as well. Progress in the well being sense, I dunno. They have measures of poverty and illness, etc

 

Disagreeing with these elements of recent Government policy/actions doesn't equate to having an anti-Government rant. It really will be a sad state of affairs if that's where the bar is to be set.

 

If you dont agree with any well being measures that's fine. We measure GDP which is one measure, productivity. Our existence includes happiness, health, education,unemployment, poverty, etc. In NZ we might say our GDP is going well, but our health, mental health and child poverty are worse then almost all countries. Not great.

 

 


Aredwood
3885 posts

Uber Geek


  #2262273 22-Jun-2019 00:40

tdgeek:

Aredwood:


 


That above article doesn't say what SB thinks National should have done at the time to pass RMA changes. And it still doesn't refute my original point. Which is that National needed another party (or parties) to help them pass any changes.



It doesn't matter what Labour put in the Wellbeing Budget. If you have lost your job. Then any claims of improved Wellbeing will sound completely untrue to you.


It says they had an opportunity in the first term, but National wanted the watered down version. Im not sure what the watered down version as, but so many everywhere say we need to reform RMA, so a water down version was probably never going to solve much anyway.


I don't work in the health sector or the education sector or have mental health afflictions. That doesnt mean that a budget based on wellbeing for our vulnerable has no value. Its a sad time if that's what it comes down to.



In the 2008 election, National got 1,053,398 votes. While Act got 85,496 votes. Which is at least a 12:1 ratio in favor of National. This alone is why Act should have stopped acting like spoiled little kids, and supported the changes as National had proposed. Especially as the only reason Act was even in government, was due to the Epsom electorate deal that National did with them. And in every subsequent election, Act have gotten less and less votes. In the 2017 election, Act got only 13,057 votes compared to the 1,152,075 votes that National got. A ratio of over 88:1.

And why is National being criticized for not agreeing to let the tail wag the dog “so to speak”. When the RMA would have been reformed ages ago if Labour had voted in favor of Nationals proposed reforms. Or if Labour had introduced their own RMA reforms.

But it seems that Labour haven't yet fully accepted that the RMA needs to be reformed. As my understanding is that they want to create “Urban Development Authorities” To effectively give the government a “Free Pass” to avoid all RMA restrictions (among other things). So Labour can both avoid having to admit that the RMA should be reformed, wont risk losing votes from people who dont want the RMA reformed. And Labour would then be able to say: Look at those evil landbanking property developers, refusing to hurry up and build houses on their land. We will get an UDA to forcibly acquire their land and build houses ourselves. When the reason for not building houses is actually due to the RMA.





Aredwood
3885 posts

Uber Geek


  #2262275 22-Jun-2019 01:22

tdgeek:

If you dont agree with any well being measures that's fine. We measure GDP which is one measure, productivity. Our existence includes happiness, health, education,unemployment, poverty, etc. In NZ we might say our GDP is going well, but our health, mental health and child poverty are worse then almost all countries. Not great.


 



I fully agree that GDP is a terrible measure of a countries overall level of Wellbeing. Although a simple (but far better) alternative measure would be GDP per capita.

But neither National nor Labour would actually want to be held accountable on the basis of GDP per capita. As both parties have done the trick of running high immigration as a method of pumping up the economy. Which inflates headline GDP, but simply adds to high house prices, rents, traffic congestion etc. And is also used to keep wages low. As we grant work visas to bus drivers and similar people. Rather than saying to bus companies: “The market has spoken- The reason that you cannot employ enough bus drivers is because you are not paying enough money. Increase your wages instead of expecting a sweetheart deal from the government”.

But stupid governments (from both sides of the political spectrum) dont allow the markets to work properly. Then they complain that the markets are broken, and that they need to regulate.

Same thing with jobs like Teachers and Nurses. If there is a shortage then pay rates are too low.





wsnz
649 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2263591 24-Jun-2019 19:27
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

Its not sensationalist. Budgets usually cover a wide range of stuff, this does as well, but does place a focus on well being.

 

Which of the last budgets didn't focus on the well being of New Zealanders? They all have provided more funding and initiatives for services the government at the time view as important. That might be public services such as the health sector, education, or perhaps elements of the economy which raise living standards for all. Nothing delivered in this budget required a change to the headline.

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

NZ has many challenges, always will. Every topic needs more money. This budget focussed more on social issues, which like everything else, has challenges. They decided it was a priority, thats all   There is no implication that every budget will be a Well Being budget. It may well be transport, it may well be climate change, it may well be a non themed budget

 

The only assertion I'm making is that the Government (esp Grant Robertson) inferred that there would be future Well Being budgets. You mentioned that there wasn't a need for any future ones, so I'm just pointing out what GR stated.

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

GDP is a measure, that how we decide how well we are going but its heavily flawed. The state of he well being metrics shows that. Its flawed when evaluating economics as well. Progress in the well being sense, I dunno. They have measures of poverty and illness, etc

 

 

Again, I'm not disagreeing with you on the GDP measure. What I am wanting to know when and how will updates on progress of issues addressed by the Welling Budget be delivered to us? Is that to be via the LSF dashboard? 

 

tdgeek:

 

If you dont agree with any well being measures that's fine. We measure GDP which is one measure, productivity. Our existence includes happiness, health, education,unemployment, poverty, etc. In NZ we might say our GDP is going well, but our health, mental health and child poverty are worse then almost all countries. Not great.

 

Again, I'm not disagreeing with measures other than GDP being used. I must admit that I am concerned at the methodology used to develop these alternatives (attaching a monetary valuation to additional friendships for example), because subjective measures cannot be easily objectively measured, but the main issue is where can we go to see updates on progress? I cant' rely on the GDP figures freely available from the usual sources.


tdgeek
29740 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2263600 24-Jun-2019 19:40
Send private message

wsnz:

 

tdgeek:

 

Its not sensationalist. Budgets usually cover a wide range of stuff, this does as well, but does place a focus on well being.

 

Which of the last budgets didn't focus on the well being of New Zealanders? They all have provided more funding and initiatives for services the government at the time view as important. That might be public services such as the health sector, education, or perhaps elements of the economy which raise living standards for all. Nothing delivered in this budget required a change to the headline.

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

NZ has many challenges, always will. Every topic needs more money. This budget focussed more on social issues, which like everything else, has challenges. They decided it was a priority, thats all   There is no implication that every budget will be a Well Being budget. It may well be transport, it may well be climate change, it may well be a non themed budget

 

The only assertion I'm making is that the Government (esp Grant Robertson) inferred that there would be future Well Being budgets. You mentioned that there wasn't a need for any future ones, so I'm just pointing out what GR stated.

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

GDP is a measure, that how we decide how well we are going but its heavily flawed. The state of he well being metrics shows that. Its flawed when evaluating economics as well. Progress in the well being sense, I dunno. They have measures of poverty and illness, etc

 

 

Again, I'm not disagreeing with you on the GDP measure. What I am wanting to know when and how will updates on progress of issues addressed by the Welling Budget be delivered to us? Is that to be via the LSF dashboard? 

 

tdgeek:

 

If you dont agree with any well being measures that's fine. We measure GDP which is one measure, productivity. Our existence includes happiness, health, education,unemployment, poverty, etc. In NZ we might say our GDP is going well, but our health, mental health and child poverty are worse then almost all countries. Not great.

 

Again, I'm not disagreeing with measures other than GDP being used. I must admit that I am concerned at the methodology used to develop these alternatives (attaching a monetary valuation to additional friendships for example), because subjective measures cannot be easily objectively measured, but the main issue is where can we go to see updates on progress? I cant' rely on the GDP figures freely available from the usual sources.

 

 

Well Being in this budget was personal. Mental Health for those afflicted is more personal than DHB's getting x million or education getting new classrooms. Personal Physical Well Being as compared to general well being

 

I take the challenges comment as in general. Not Well Being challenges. Technically challenges are everywhere, Well Being was addressed more this budget.Did GR state "there will be more Well Being budgets" Link?

 

Measures, Stats NZ has measure on these well being issues, as does OECD, where we are low

 

 


Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #2265632 27-Jun-2019 09:46
Send private message

I don't mind the concept of a "wellbeing" budget.

 

OTOH, it's going to be just as subject to Goodhart's law as GDP, inflation targets, hospital waiting lists, NCEA pass rates, prison population, etc.

 

 "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."

 

 

 

 


GV27
5896 posts

Uber Geek


  #2266094 28-Jun-2019 10:06
Send private message

Any thoughts on the cabinet reshuffle? Can't find too much to object to here, although I hope Twyford now has time to sort out NZTA. 


Journeyman
1186 posts

Uber Geek


  #2266119 28-Jun-2019 10:33
Send private message

Like he sorted out Kiwibuild...?


1 | ... | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | ... | 182
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.