![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Australian and European safety regulators said a few years ago that the Cybertruck in its original prototype form would be unlikely to pass local safety tests and therefore would probably not be road legal in any of those countries. I would assume that also means it probably wouldn't pass NZ safety tests.
Did Tesla ultimately make changes to the design to get around that, or will our roads never be graced with this elegant, refined beauty of a vehicle? 😉
Rushmere: Musk is sounding increasingly desperate.
His latest public response to the companies that have currently paused advertising on Twitter was "Go fu*k yourself". ...
Sideface
Read this on a comments section: "The only product by Elon Musk that doesn't suck is a vacuum cleaner."
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
When Suzie went to use the new Tesla stick vacuum she thought Tom had bought.
Was she in for a surprise !
Why would anyone in their right mind buy a flamethrower ! :-)
The NY Times - Illicit Content on Elon Musk’s X Draws E.U. Investigation
18 Dec 2023
The European Union announced a formal investigation Monday into X, the social media platform owned by Elon Musk, accusing it of failing to counter illicit content and disinformation, a lack of transparency about advertising and “deceptive” design practices.
The inquiry is perhaps the most substantial regulatory move to date against X since it scaled back its content moderation policies after Mr. Musk bought the service, once known as Twitter, last year.
The company’s new policies have led to a rise in incendiary content on the platform, according to researchers, causing brands to scale back advertising. ...
The investigation highlights a major difference between the United States and Europe in policing the internet.
While online posts are largely unregulated in the United States as a result of free speech protections, European governments, for historical and cultural reasons, have put more restrictions in place around hate speech, incitement to violence and other harmful material.
Sideface
Rushmere:
Australian and European safety regulators said a few years ago that the Cybertruck in its original prototype form would be unlikely to pass local safety tests and therefore would probably not be road legal in any of those countries. I would assume that also means it probably wouldn't pass NZ safety tests.
Did Tesla ultimately make changes to the design to get around that, or will our roads never be graced with this elegant, refined beauty of a vehicle? 😉
Yes, the SmartyPants said that it is "highly likely" that Tesla will make a smaller version for Europe...
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
I think this discussion should have been settled weeks ago when Elon hosted a live with an indicted sex trafficker and a convicted conspiracy theorist that lied about victims of a school mass shooting.
The man is a billionaire idiot at best, a full-on racist bigot at worst.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
Australia’s eSafety commissioner sues X over lack of transparency | X | The Guardian
The Australian eSafety commissioner has launched legal action against X, previously known as Twitter, for allegedly failing to provide information about how it was tackling online child abuse material.
The commission has accused X of failing to comply with a legal notice, issued in February, which requested information on how the company was “meeting basic online safety expectations in relation to child sexual exploitation and abuse material”.
“Specifically, eSafety alleges that X Corp. did not prepare a report in the manner and form specified because it failed to respond or failed to respond truthfully and accurately to certain questions in the notice,” an eSafety spokesperson said.
“It is important that X Corp and other providers are deterred from non-compliance with statutory notices.”
In September, the eSafety commission fined X Corp $610,500 for failing to comply with the transparency notice. According to the commission, X did not pay the fine and it subsequently sought a judicial review of the legal notice and the fine.
Interesting how they can rapidly block anti-government posters/posts in authoritarian countries but won't respond to requests to explain their processes for getting ride of vile CSAM content. Or for that matter block it. And then ignore fines for refusing to answer government enquiries.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |