Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Please note this sub-forum does not provide professional finance advice. You should seek advice from a licensed financial advisor.

To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification.

If investing please consider our affiliate link for new accounts: Sharesies.



freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
79253 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

#317920 27-Nov-2024 16:09
Send private message

From Commerce Commission:

 

 

Kiwibank has been fined $1.5million after pleading guilty to systemic and long-running breaches of the Fair Trading Act that led to 35,000 customers being overcharged a total amount of $6.8 million.

 

Commerce Commission Deputy Chair Anne Callinan says the offending was serious and the result of a raft of failures in Kiwibank’s systems.

 

“There were long-standing flaws in Kiwibank’s systems and processes that led to these breaches, some of which likely date back to Kiwibank’s inception in 2002,” Ms Callinan says.

 

“Banks must have processes in place to ensure consumers are getting a fair deal and consumers would reasonably assume that banks wouldn’t make errors of this sort.” 

 

“The Commission expects banks to make the necessary investment in the systems that support their compliance obligations so they get things right for consumers.”

 

The Commission prosecuted Kiwibank for 21 criminal charges under the Fair Trading Act for making misleading representations to its customers about its services, which Kiwibank did not provide on the stated and agreed terms.

 

There were significant failures in which Kiwibank did not provide the services as agreed, in relation to five issues, with their customers. Kiwibank failed to:

 

    - provide agreed discounts and interest-free periods to customers who had entered into package benefit agreements
    - properly calculate customers’ regular repayments when customers requested changes to their loan in particular circumstances
    - ensure that customers were switched to repaying loan principal (as well as making interest payments) at the end of agreed interest-only periods
    - provide agreed discounts on the overdraft interest rates payable by home loan customers
    - charge the correct amounts of various fees to certain loan customers

 

“These failures were caused by errors in Kiwibank’s electronic systems and a lack of quality assurance checks to make sure that staff knew how to carry out the processes required, and that these processes were being followed correctly,” Ms Callinan says.

 

The issues were first identified by Kiwibank and reported to the Commission. Kiwibank has been contacting and apologising to customers and is progressively refunding $9.2 million in remediation.

 

Kiwibank was sentenced in the Auckland District Court on 26 November.

 





Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSyncBackblaze backup


Create new topic
richms
28168 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3313451 27-Nov-2024 16:27
Send private message

Overcharge 6.8 million and only pay 1.5 million? That's a good return on investment for the bank. IMO the fine should be more than the overcharge, not less.





Richard rich.ms



Handsomedan
7281 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #3313455 27-Nov-2024 16:46
Send private message

It's a relatively minor fine in comparison to what is usually levied at banks for breaches of ethics or regulations. 





Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...

 

Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale 

 

 

 

*Gladly accepting donations...


nova
250 posts

Master Geek

Trusted

  #3313456 27-Nov-2024 16:50
Send private message

richms:

 

Overcharge 6.8 million and only pay 1.5 million? That's a good return on investment for the bank. IMO the fine should be more than the overcharge, not less.

 

 

Yes, it would be, but in this case Kiwibank is also refunding customers directly:

 

Article:

 

Kiwibank has been contacting and apologising to customers and is progressively refunding $9.2 million in remediation.

 




johno1234
2794 posts

Uber Geek


  #3313473 27-Nov-2024 17:35
Send private message

richms:

 

Overcharge 6.8 million and only pay 1.5 million? That's a good return on investment for the bank. IMO the fine should be more than the overcharge, not less.

 

 

I hope that is in addition to the overcharge being paid back to the customers!


Ge0rge
2052 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3313476 27-Nov-2024 17:47
Send private message

richms:

Overcharge 6.8 million and only pay 1.5 million? That's a good return on investment for the bank. IMO the fine should be more than the overcharge, not less.



Perhaps partly mitigated by the fact Kiwibank dobbed itself in to the Commission?

tardtasticx
3075 posts

Uber Geek


  #3313488 27-Nov-2024 19:24
Send private message

Most banks I believe have teams dedicated to remediation activities (where they’ve overcharged or similar and need to make it right). The fine will be on top of whatever they’ve overcharged and reimbursed customers for.

Handsomedan
7281 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #3313700 28-Nov-2024 10:01
Send private message

Ge0rge:
richms:

 

Overcharge 6.8 million and only pay 1.5 million? That's a good return on investment for the bank. IMO the fine should be more than the overcharge, not less.

 



Perhaps partly mitigated by the fact Kiwibank dobbed itself in to the Commission?

 

Surprisingly common practice. 

 

Teams are dedicated to finding breaches, errors and responding to complaints, so that banks can stay ahead of potential litigation. 
With the volume of transactions, the creaking infrastructure and the rapid changes in the industry, there's always the chance of a mistake, turning into a potential catastrophe. And nobody wants that. 
NZ banks don't knowingly rip people off - inherent trust is paramount, or the whole system collapses. 





Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...

 

Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale 

 

 

 

*Gladly accepting donations...


Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.