Hi this could be interesting for some. I used to be a serviceman, and worked in TV industry so I guess Im qualified to comment about TVs.
We have a perfectly good Sony 46EX500 (46" 1080p) which has served our home for about 5 years however like all technophobes, I would like to get something a tad more current and higher spec, and The Warehouse ad for a 55" Veon V55UHDS seemed too good to be true. My budget is around $1400 and this special offer is $699 UNBELIEVABLE!
I got a bunch of test patterns and UHD video clips on a USB, including one 3 minute scene from Harry Potter movie in a forest. This scene was very low resolution, but ideal for proving good low-light luminance in a test set.
Yes, i know, most folks go to a store, look at a set and say thats the one. But I'm a critical shopper and I guess the type of customer sales people hope to avoid.
The Warehouse support provided a user manual for me to check the specs out for model V55UHDS and I dont need Android o/s or smart TV, I simply want a good picture as I already have a Vigica Multimedia DVB-S player which does essentially the same job as a smart TV.
On paper, the Veon looked perfect. Unfortunately, in reality the converse applied. If you go to The Warehouse and TV department, you may notice a lack of dynamic range and pixelation on their TVs (Veon & JVC). The assistant was very helpful (top marks to The Warehouse for customer service and warranty), unfortunately, I had to say to her that either the TV are not up to the job, or my USB stick files are faulty. The Veon refused to play most of the files even though they were in the playable spec list, and the HD ones it would play were just as bad (pixelation and poor chroma accuracy) as the blu-ray video they were playing when I arrived. Given that there is a 3 year warranty for the Veon and the price was so good I was hoping my USB was the culprit. Following tests with other makes of TV had no problems opening files on same USB which was formatted FAT32 as per Veon specs.
Next stop, Harvey Norman, where I struck a very competent salesman again. After hearing my budget of $1400 he demonstrated a $2000 Series 7000 Samsung, a really nice set with some edge lighting problems but amazing contrast and accurate low-light levels.
http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=34&topicid=207810
Its other problem was edge viewing eg when you go slightly to the side of the picture it deteriorates and in our situation some folks are seated in that area. LG doesnt suffer from this issue.
However, and heres the most important bit of my diatribe, the Harry Potter test failed miserably with LG. I have a short HP test very low resolution, which is a giveaway for sets that dont have good luminance tracking on low levels. Despite any user settings the LG would not show the 'forest floor and Harry' about 20 seconds into the video. Samsung and Sony sail through this test. Why its so important is that many movies have these dark scenes, and even if not so dark, have you struggled to see whats happening in a night scene? this should not be the case. If you have a TV (unfortunately for LG) that has poor low luminance response, the scenes are basically black with no information. Nobody seems to know about this problem unless they have a good TV and buy a second one which exhibits this fault. Yes, I call it a fault as a TV job is to reproduce accurately video information, and if its processor removes information, then its not fit for purpose.
So at this stage we have an Alistair who likes the LG for everything else, including a better price than Samsung and Sony, to a Samsung which is grossly overpriced IMHO (6000 series 2016/7 new years promo $1200 Noel Leeming manufacturers promotion), to a Sony which I may end up with as price is reasonable, edge lighting has no problem and edge viewing similar to LG with great low level luminance, though price is still higher than my budget.
The problems with LG luminance have been notified to them, and if they reply I will add here.
Unfortunately, Hisense which are arguably better than Samsung, much cheaper than Samsung, are not available in NZ; they have great reviews overseas and are in JBHIFI AU but not here as the sets dont have Kiwi TV standards.
Wondering why I never mentioned Panasonics: http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=34&topicid=93084
God bless,
Alistair.
PS if you want you can try low resolution test video from
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1541849/HarryP.avi.zip