Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


McNulty

152 posts

Master Geek


#94347 8-Dec-2011 16:19
Send private message

I'm comparing a 27" LCD monitor with a 32" LCD TV. Both are full HD etc. The TV has a greater variety of inputs and more bells & whistles. Is there any real benefit to getting the monitor in this situation?  

Create new topic
mattwnz
20173 posts

Uber Geek


  #555559 8-Dec-2011 16:51
Send private message

Wheres the post? Assume you have your own thoughts to share first?



McNulty

152 posts

Master Geek


  #555562 8-Dec-2011 17:15
Send private message

Thanks mattwnz, fixed now!

beaverusiv
49 posts

Geek


  #555832 9-Dec-2011 10:28
Send private message

I would go with the monitor if they are relativly the same size.

imo monitors have better quality than TVs.



Skolink
1081 posts

Uber Geek


  #557489 13-Dec-2011 15:09
Send private message

I thought there was some issue with refresh rate on a TV, unless the have 'gaming mode'. I can't remember what the trade-off is though - contrast perhaps?

beaverusiv
49 posts

Geek


  #557507 13-Dec-2011 15:57
Send private message

Both TV and monitor have same refresh rate afaik (60Hz).

TVs that I have seen do look different from a monitor, could be contrast, but I think they just are less clear (pixel bleeding or something), makes it harder to read small text, even up close.

mattwnz
20173 posts

Uber Geek


  #557512 13-Dec-2011 16:20
Send private message

Some TVs do have technology in them to improve motion, which can cause some ghosting. So aren't as good for computer use where you have more static stuff on the screen.

mattwnz
20173 posts

Uber Geek


  #557514 13-Dec-2011 16:21
Send private message

beaverusiv: I would go with the monitor if they are relativly the same size.

imo monitors have better quality than TVs.


They can use different types of LCD panel too. Monitors can be IPS or PVA, and the cheaper ones are using TN. While I think most TVs seem to use TN panels.

 
 
 

Move to New Zealand's best fibre broadband service (affiliate link). Free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE. Note that to use Quic Broadband you must be comfortable with configuring your own router.
Ragnor
8223 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #557545 13-Dec-2011 17:32
Send private message

TV's are designed for distance viewing rather than text/reading like monitors are. Using a TV close range as a monitor for reading text will probably give you some eyestrain because of the much worse dot pitch.

Same resolution larger physical screen size = larger gap between pixels.

mcraenz
1140 posts

Uber Geek


  #558562 16-Dec-2011 08:37
Send private message

What are you using it for? General desktop computing? At some point adding inches without adding resolution becomes counter-productive. If it's for an HTPC that's a different story. Do you need audio? It doesn't really mater, TVa, TVb or Monitor c. Pick the one which has the best looking picture to you.






 

Help me build a better way of doing politics in Aotearoa New Zealand

 

 

 


richms
28198 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #559484 19-Dec-2011 11:12
Send private message

TV's seem to get a brain dead default of overscan correction when plugged into an ATI card, monitors do not.

Also there is usually some sharpness applied on TVs even when they are getting their native resolution, they will look aweful till you find the correct setting on the tv that doesn't apply sharpening. Its not always 0 like you would expect. Monitors tend to not have artificial edge enhancement applied making them look softer on video stuff but look good on text so that cleartext etc will actually work.




Richard rich.ms

Phexx
415 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #559504 19-Dec-2011 11:46
Send private message

Ragnor: TV's are designed for distance viewing rather than text/reading like monitors are. Using a TV close range as a monitor for reading text will probably give you some eyestrain because of the much worse dot pitch.

Same resolution larger physical screen size = larger gap between pixels.

This. I used a 21.5 inch LCD as a second monitor and no matter how hard I tried, text and details looked nowehere near as sharp as my monitor did.  

Hammerer
2476 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #559511 19-Dec-2011 11:57
Send private message

If your computer is a laptop then take it in and test drive both.

Is price an issue for you? TV's have more bang for your buck and often have better specials.

Future options are greater with a TV.

All other things being equal, bigger is better. Over time, the screen size seems to shrink as you get used to it. That's why so many people are upgrading.

Check that the optimum viewing distances for size and resolution fit with your workspace. If you are doing a lot of close-up work (e.g. paperwork) then you may find it difficult having to refocus to a larger screen further away.

TVs are great for moving images in gaming and at FullHD fine with static text. If you're using every bit of FullHD resolution then a monitor will usually be better but may not be an issue if you have resolution to spare.

Klipspringer
2385 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #559514 19-Dec-2011 12:04
Send private message

beaverusiv: Both TV and monitor have same refresh rate afaik (60Hz).



Which is really slow. I find watching some of the older type LCD's which are below 100hz somewhat nauseating. And its especially noticable in fast scenes.

beaverusiv
49 posts

Geek


  #559539 19-Dec-2011 13:02
Send private message

richms: TV's seem to get a brain dead default of overscan correction when plugged into an ATI card, monitors do not. 



I have an ATi card and a monitor and it underscans... so frustrating, especially with their crappy drivers trying to find the options and making it stick :/

I do agree with you, though. HDTVs should not default to overscan. 1:1 zoom!

mattwnz
20173 posts

Uber Geek


  #559540 19-Dec-2011 13:04
Send private message

BraaiGuy:
beaverusiv: Both TV and monitor have same refresh rate afaik (60Hz).



Which is really slow. I find watching some of the older type LCD's which are below 100hz somewhat nauseating. And its especially noticable in fast scenes.

Running at 100Hz or more reduces the picture quality and makes everything look like it was shot on a home video camera. eg The soap opera effect.

The newer LCDs are far better at handling moving images with the motionflow turned off, than the old panels.

Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.