![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself - A. H. Weiler
lowededwookie: Not from what I understand.
General practise seems to be let people continue to use their old e-mail accounts.
That being said Orcon recently cancelled my e-mail account through non-use so maybe Spark is doing the same.
Would have been nice if Spark had let people know this was going to be the case though.
Thing is it was working up until Thursday.
I'm a geek, a gamer, a dad, a Quic user, and an IT Professional. I have a full rack home lab, size 15 feet, an epic beard and Asperger's. I'm a bit of a Cypherpunk, who believes information wants to be free and the Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. If you use my Quic signup you can also use the code R570394EKGIZ8 for free setup.
Ray Taylor
There is no place like localhost
Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here
raytaylor: Lets put this into a little context
Most ISPs run their own email servers for customers.
However Spark outsources their email platform to Yahoo.
We are not sure if Yahoo pays Spark for the privilege or Spark pays Yahoo but there is a per-mailbox charge going on there for all the yahoo services that are provided with the service.
So if we assume that Spark is paying Yahoo for the email services, which were once branded Xtra Bubble when it was first launched, then Spark surely doesnt want to be paying for email hosting of inactive or ex customers.
To put it in cost terms
Yahoo probably charges a dollar a month per mailbox.
If we run our own server, with 10,000 mailboxes, its probably only going to cost about five cents per month, per mailbox.
So you can see why Spark is very proactive about closing old mailboxes.
Telstra Clear (@clear / @paradise) is another one that is known for keeping old email addresses alive years after a customer has left.
They never provided an externally accessible smtp service AFAIK so customers always had problems accessing their mailbox via a software client after switching ISPs but it usually could be done.
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
cokemaster: Speaking hypothetically here...
In addition to the platform costs (operating costs, back ups, monitoring etc) /licensing costs (which do add up depending on your platform of choice), you also have support costs. Whats often overlooked is that many ISP's in NZ provide customer support for their email platforms (which you don't necessarily get with your free alternatives, opting for online only interactions or no/limited support at all), this does add cost to provide (0800 numbers, call centre platforms, people etc).
If you aren't collecting any revenue then everytime someone calls about a "free" account, you're taking a big bath. Even if they don't call but still have an account open with no revenue, you still take a bath.
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
cokemaster: If there are calls driven into Customer care, then there will definitely be a cost incurred by telephony costs and headcount (if you need to have more people than you otherwise would), even if you don't have to buy additional capacity or licenses on your call centre platforms.
Hypothetically, of course.
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
cokemaster: Speaking hypothetically here again...
It doesn't really matter if I pay per fte or on a per call model, I would still incur costs that I wouldn't otherwise incur (regardless of whether it's done in or out of house). Paid products such as broadband and standalone email generally would have support considerations built into the margins which would cover these (common practice in business).
bigpipe.co.nz
https://www.facebook.com/BigPipeNZ
https://twitter.com/BigPipeNZ
Lias: AFAIK only Orcon offered "Free Email for Life", and bloody handy it's been too!
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |