![]() ![]() |
The Maori Party was unhappy that the bill did not ensure Maori gained part of the telecommunications sector which it was entitled to under the Treaty of Waitangi.
sbiddle:
The Maori Party was unhappy that the bill did not ensure Maori gained part of the telecommunications sector which it was entitled to under the Treaty of Waitangi.
???
I know the Maoris believe they own the radio spectrum but I didn't think they had ever tried toclaim Telecom's copper as well!
....Maybe somebody should mention the words Hauraki Trust and Econet to them..
Jama: From the Herald on Monday:
"You can't expect airlines to just go on losing money or making inadequate profits because everyone wanted to see competition," Mr Fyfe said. "Competition that loses money or destroys value is in no one's interest."
Very prophetic Mr Fyfe.
________
Antoniosk
antoniosk: Well, one has to question where the investment is going to come from now.
antoniosk: Callplus's statement on wimax is smoke...
Please provide a link to back up your assertion.
I don't think the sun shines out of CallPlus by any means, but there is no denying that they have rolled out more Wimax than anybody else in NZ with trials in Whangarei (reportedly at a cost of $3M) and another trial at Gulf Harbour.
The funding that CallPlus have reportedly secured in Japan does sound like a huge amount of money but let's give them a chance to put their money where their mouth is and start rolling out Wimax on a wider scale.
antoniosk: What will Maurice Williamson do if no-one invests in NZ except Telecom (by quietly rolling out fibre to protect their high-value customers)??
Telecom have had years to roll out fibre but apart from a trial in Pakuranga (in the late 1990s I think it was) and a recent announcement of their plans for a new subdivision at Flat Bush (and I think some other parts of Manukau City) there has been precious little action so far as residential customers are concerned.
Sure they have been careful to "roll out fibre to protect their high-value customers" in places like Auckland CBD and Albany, but those areas have competing fibre networks from Citylink and TelstraClear. It's a little bit like the way Telecom only offer their lowest HomeLine pricing to customers in areas where TCL also have a residential phone network.
Replying to Grant17's challenge:
This is copied straight from the NBR - I have added my highlights to specify where callplus's comments on wimax are smoke:
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | Martin Wylie |
![]() |
________
Antoniosk
Grant17: Thanks Antonios.
Suppose Telecom or some other player with deep pockets decides to play hardball and bid up the price of the spectrum to such an extent that earning a commercial return on the proposed wireless services becomes impossible.
antoniosk: Well, one has to question where the investment is going to come from now. Callplus's statement on wimax is smoke; they are using it as a bludgeon on Telecom to move faster on LLU. Ihug sent back the UBS determination today because they're losing money.
It all seems a lie; what will Maurice Williamson do if no-one invests in NZ except Telecom (by quietly rolling out fibre to protect their high-value customers)??
barf: what type & wavelength of fibre-optic cable is used between remote-units and exchanges? ie how ready is the infrastructure to move to 10G ethernet? (ATM uses two cells to send a single TCP-ACK. I got my fingers crossed for MPLS & Ethernet deployments.)
![]() ![]() |