Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


scottjpalmer

5973 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#10816 13-Dec-2006 13:08
Send private message
Create new topic
TinyTim
1042 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #55371 13-Dec-2006 13:33
Send private message

119-2. Wow.




 



grant_k
3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #55372 13-Dec-2006 13:34
Send private message

"Parliament today passed legislation forcing Telecom to open its copper wires to competitors...
Only ACT opposed the bill, which passed 119-2."


Even the NATs supported this bill (belatedly), yet they would never have had the guts to initiate it.

Not many bills which come before the house are supported almost across the board like this one.

sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #55381 13-Dec-2006 15:23
Send private message


The Maori Party was unhappy that the bill did not ensure Maori gained part of the telecommunications sector which it was entitled to under the Treaty of Waitangi.


???
 
I know the Maoris believe they own the radio spectrum but I didn't think they had ever tried to claim Telecom's copper as well!

....Maybe somebody should mention the words Hauraki Trust and Econet to them..




TinyTim
1042 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #55383 13-Dec-2006 15:35
Send private message

sbiddle:

The Maori Party was unhappy that the bill did not ensure Maori gained part of the telecommunications sector which it was entitled to under the Treaty of Waitangi.


???

I know the Maoris believe they own the radio spectrum but I didn't think they had ever tried toclaim Telecom's copper as well!

....Maybe somebody should mention the words Hauraki Trust and Econet to them..



I doubt very much of that copper was here before the European invaders.




 

Jama
1420 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #55385 13-Dec-2006 16:14
Send private message

From the Herald on Monday:

"You can't expect airlines to just go on losing money or making inadequate profits because everyone wanted to see competition," Mr Fyfe said. "Competition that loses money or destroys value is in no one's interest."

Very prophetic Mr Fyfe.

sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #55392 13-Dec-2006 17:22
Send private message

Jama: From the Herald on Monday:

"You can't expect airlines to just go on losing money or making inadequate profits because everyone wanted to see competition," Mr Fyfe said. "Competition that loses money or destroys value is in no one's interest."

Very prophetic Mr Fyfe.



Both Telecom and AirNZ share one thing in common. They both complain about so called "losses" yet seem unable to actually provide the proof that these losses occur. Telecom claim they have unprofitable customers yet are unwilling to give them away even when they were offered money for them. AirNZ claim they lose money flying from NZ to Australia yet can't provide the evidence to prove that is infact the case.


antoniosk
2358 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #55396 13-Dec-2006 18:29
Send private message

Well, one has to question where the investment is going to come from now. Callplus's statement on wimax is smoke; they are using it as a bludgeon on Telecom to move faster on LLU. Ihug sent back the UBS determination today because they're losing money.

It all seems a lie; what will Maurice Williamson do if no-one invests in NZ except Telecom (by quietly rolling out fibre to protect their high-value customers)??




________

 

Antoniosk


 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
CrispinMullins
128 posts

Master Geek


  #55400 13-Dec-2006 19:13

antoniosk: Well, one has to question where the investment is going to come from now.


Investment in what? The copper between homes/businesses and the local exchange they're attached to? I don't imagine that a whole lot of investment is required there.

Of course, other companies are going to invest in putting their equipment into local exchanges and organising their own backhaul from local exchanges to the internet -- and if they don't, then they'll continue to use UBS, in which case very little will change for them. Companies that invest little in their own backhauls are likely to keep less customers satisfied than the companies that make significant investment.

Finally, a chance to use some of that dark fibre that various companies have laid up and down the country!



grant_k
3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #55401 13-Dec-2006 19:26
Send private message

antoniosk: Callplus's statement on wimax is smoke...

How do you know that Antonios?


Please provide a link to back up your assertion.


I don't think the sun shines out of CallPlus by any means, but there is no denying that they have rolled out more Wimax than anybody else in NZ with trials in Whangarei (reportedly at a cost of $3M) and another trial at Gulf Harbour.


The funding that CallPlus have reportedly secured in Japan does sound like a huge amount of money but let's give them a chance to put their money where their mouth is and start rolling out Wimax on a wider scale.


antoniosk: What will Maurice Williamson do if no-one invests in NZ except Telecom (by quietly rolling out fibre to protect their high-value customers)??

Telecom have had years to roll out fibre but apart from a trial in Pakuranga (in the late 1990s I think it was) and a recent announcement of their plans for a new subdivision at Flat Bush (and I think some other parts of Manukau City) there has been precious little action so far as residential customers are concerned.

Sure they have been careful to "roll out fibre to protect their high-value customers" in places like Auckland CBD and Albany, but those areas have competing fibre networks from Citylink and TelstraClear.  It's a little bit like the way Telecom only offer their lowest HomeLine pricing to customers in areas where TCL also have a residential phone network.


chchperson
12 posts

Geek


  #55405 13-Dec-2006 20:32
Send private message

Out of interest how many exchanges are there in the country? I think I would be right in assuming that the bigger cities will see their exchanges having DSLAMs installed by other ISPs first. Can anyone point me to a link that gives an overview of the task at hand for some of these ISPs that want to put their DSLAMs into telecom's exchanges what sort of investment are they looking at?

barf
643 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #55408 13-Dec-2006 21:00

what type & wavelength of fibre-optic cable is used between remote-units and exchanges? ie how ready is the infrastructure to move to 10G ethernet? (ATM uses two cells to send a single TCP-ACK. I got my fingers crossed for MPLS & Ethernet deployments.)

chchperson: to give you an idea of the investment required, I got quoted for a 48-port (ethernet MUX) ADSL2+ DSLAM @ ~$5300+GST.. exchanges are seperate to RUs (remote units, which house line cards and DSLAMs multiplex that out to the bigger exchanges) which probably make up a large number of the total "exchanges". And there must be thousands of those.




Sniffing the glue holding the Internet together

antoniosk
2358 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #55409 13-Dec-2006 21:10
Send private message

Replying to Grant17's challenge:

This is copied straight from the NBR - I have added my highlights to specify where callplus's comments on wimax are smoke:

CallPlus secures massive funding from Japan
by Kate McLaughlin
NBRMartin Wylie
NBR
Martin Wylie
NBR
Company can now go ahead with plans for a nationwide WiMax broadband network

In the New Year the government will auction off rights to 2.3GHz spectrum, ideal for deploying WiMax. With the new funding CallPlus is aiming to secure a “big wedge of that nationwide.”

Mr Wylie said once the outcome of the auction was clear, CallPlus and its new investors would make a decision about “how hard and how fast” to build the WiMax network. “We’re pretty bullish about it.”

But as well as being used for a WiMax network, CallPlus’ new funding could be used to expand its fixed line business (it currently wholesales Telecom services).

The government is now working through legislation first announced on May 3 that would allow companies such as CallPlus access to Telecom’s network in an arrangement called local loop unbundling.

There is the prospect that we could use the funding for deploying our own Dslams [equipment that provides access to Telecom’s network] – if local loop unbundling gets legs and actually happens in my lifetime,” Mr Wylie said.

CallPlus issued a statement yesterday outlining why it believed Telecom was to blame for CallPlus customers experiencing broadband problems.

“Ultimately we’ll get to a point where they [Telecom] will drive us to build this network because this is the way they behave.”

My interpretation is this is that it's smoke - Callplus have said ONCE THE AUCTION OUTCOME IS CLEAR. It's not the same as saying "we're going flat out now" - and Call+ could - the Alvarion Wimax gear is out. This to me is a threat statement - speed it up TNZ or I'll roll out a competing wireless network, and now I'm saying I've got the money to do it.

Just not clear on spectrum yet....




________

 

Antoniosk


grant_k
3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #55411 13-Dec-2006 21:51
Send private message

Thanks Antonios.  That article from the NBR provides some further useful background.

I don't read Martin Wylie's comments as "smoke" though.  To me it just says they are being prudent as would most companies contemplating an investment of more than half a billion $.

Until CallPlus have secured rights to the spectrum at auction -- hopefully for a price which is commercially viable -- they would be idiots to start ordering the Alvarion gear.

Suppose Telecom or some other player with deep pockets decides to play hardball and bid up the price of the spectrum to such an extent that earning a commercial return on the proposed wireless services becomes impossible.

At that point CallPlus could resort to Plan B which has been provided today by courtesy of the government's LLU legislation:

==> Spend the money on wired broadband equipment instead.

If however, CallPlus had already committed their funding to wireless equipment, they would be stuck between a rock and a hard place.  Keeping their options open is clearly the better strategy at this point.

sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #55430 14-Dec-2006 06:47
Send private message

Grant17: Thanks Antonios. 
Suppose Telecom or some other player with deep pockets decides to play hardball and bid up the price of the spectrum to such an extent that earning a commercial return on the proposed wireless services becomes impossible.


Getting a bit OT but for anybody who's interested there is a great section on SPectrum Auctions in Tim Harfords book the Undercover Economist

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0195189779/qid=1117304243/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14?v=glance&tag2=timharford-20

It details NZ's flawed system of selling FM radio spectrum in the early 90's and then goes into depth about the UK 3G auctions.

It's a very good read!


TinyTim
1042 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #55434 14-Dec-2006 07:49
Send private message

antoniosk: Well, one has to question where the investment is going to come from now. Callplus's statement on wimax is smoke; they are using it as a bludgeon on Telecom to move faster on LLU. Ihug sent back the UBS determination today because they're losing money.
It all seems a lie; what will Maurice Williamson do if no-one invests in NZ except Telecom (by quietly rolling out fibre to protect their high-value customers)??


Telecom's going to get all these new wholesale customers - and they don't even have to do any marketing or retailing. If I were Telecom I'd be jumping on the opportunity to invest and sell more and better wholesale services and products. Telecom wants the whole of a tiny pie whereas I'd go for part of a big pie.


barf: what type & wavelength of fibre-optic cable is used between remote-units and exchanges? ie how ready is the infrastructure to move to 10G ethernet? (ATM uses two cells to send a single TCP-ACK. I got my fingers crossed for MPLS & Ethernet deployments.)

Fibre between (all) remote units/active cabinets and exchanges? Bold assumption...




 

Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.