BigPipe customers - Any UFB customers care to review?

Forums › Spark New Zealand (including Skinny and BigPipe) › BigPipe customers - Any UFB customers care to review?

ckrewt

8 posts

Wannabe Geek

#173396 21-May-2015 16:28

Hello All,

I am currently a Snap customer with a 200/20 plan with unlimited. While my connection is pretty sweet i get great latency and good speeds the customer service has something to be desired and i can save afew bucks by switching to BigPipe, I was wondering is there any UFB BigPipe customers who can vouch for them in terms of game latency and speeds? I mainly play league of legends and diablo3 so prefereably someone who plays these games would be great info.

My speedtest at Snap:

Im in Dannemora, Auckland.

corksta

2397 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Subscriber

#1309397 21-May-2015 16:38

I don't play those games but I'll offer my 2c anyway as a general user, streamer, and console gamer: connection is rock solid. I'm on 200/20 and speeds are consistently fast and latency is low too. You should get a similar speed and latency as you've posted, so why not switch and save money? Plus there's no contract with them either.

insane

3236 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

#1309406 21-May-2015 16:50

I've been with them since they first started trialing UFB in July last year having switched from Vocus. Their support has been fantastic, and they certainly have made continuous performance improvements throughout the year. I'm only on a 100mbps plan but can easily max it out when downloading a single popular thing.

I also like how they only change a on-off setup fee for a static IP

chrispchikin

102 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user

#1319623 8-Jun-2015 18:12

Best ISP I have been with.

No complaints about speed, I'm on the 100/20 plan. Not a gamer or heavy downloader but quite pedantic nonetheless.

Email support is fantastic, support guys know their stuff and their product. (I hate listening to hold music anyway)

Setup was a breeze, one-off for Static IP is awesome, no contract and a free month on sign-up was the icing on the cake.

My only complaint (and its not really a complaint) is that I need to use PPPoe and have an MTU of 1492, where with VF I could just configure DHCP client on interface and have an MTU of 1500 (saves stuffing around with MSS settings on enterprise kit with VPN's etc).

Aaroona

3193 posts

Uber Geek

#1320629 9-Jun-2015 20:34

chrispchikin: Best ISP I have been with.

No complaints about speed, I'm on the 100/20 plan. Not a gamer or heavy downloader but quite pedantic nonetheless.

Email support is fantastic, support guys know their stuff and their product. (I hate listening to hold music anyway)

Setup was a breeze, one-off for Static IP is awesome, no contract and a free month on sign-up was the icing on the cake.

My only complaint (and its not really a complaint) is that I need to use PPPoe and have an MTU of 1492, where with VF I could just configure DHCP client on interface and have an MTU of 1500 (saves stuffing around with MSS settings on enterprise kit with VPN's etc).

So you have to use 1492 MTU? Does that mean you have to change it on the LAN side of your network as well, or just on the WAN side?

What is the effect of having 1492 MTU as opposed to 1500? I had a read about online, but couldnt get a definitive answer. Based on what was said here, theres mention of PPPoE only supporting a max of 1492 MTU.

chrispchikin

102 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user

#1320683 9-Jun-2015 21:25

Yes, using PPPoE adds another 8 bytes to the header size, so biggest packet you can fit is 1492 bytes.

When using an MTU of 1492 1 of 2 things usually happens for your 1500-byte MTU configured LAN devices to cope:

1) If devices try and send packets larger than the supported MTU, the device (your router) will drop the packet and send a message back to the client to make the packet smaller (ICMP type 3, code 4)

2) In some networks where these messages aren't allowed or aren't sent, a feature called 'TCP MSS adjustment' can be configured which re-writes the TCP headers so that the lower MSS value is negotiated in the TCP session setup

(TCP MSS or maximum segment size is basically the payload minus the headers, i.e. Standard 1500 byte MTU - 40 byte headers = 1460 byte MSS)

Don't think there are any noticeable performance implications of 1492 vs 1500 :)

Aaroona

3193 posts

Uber Geek

#1320687 9-Jun-2015 21:31

chrispchikin: Yes, using PPPoE adds another 8 bytes to the header size, so biggest packet you can fit is 1492 bytes.

When using an MTU of 1492 1 of 2 things usually happens for your 1500-byte MTU configured LAN devices to cope:

1) If devices try and send packets larger than the supported MTU, the device (your router) will drop the packet and send a message back to the client to make the packet smaller (ICMP type 3, code 4)

2) In some networks where these messages aren't allowed or aren't sent, a feature called 'TCP MSS adjustment' can be configured which re-writes the TCP headers so that the lower MSS value is negotiated in the TCP session setup

(TCP MSS or maximum segment size is basically the payload minus the headers, i.e. Standard 1500 byte MTU - 40 byte headers = 1460 byte MSS)

Don't think there are any noticeable performance implications of 1492 vs 1500 :)

Thanks for the explanation.
Hmm, that will be interesting to see that. I presume this is normal for all UFB services then? Not unique to Bigpipe?

chrispchikin

102 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user

#1320863 10-Jun-2015 09:10

Yep, I'd say will be the case with majority of providers out there.

Although when I was with Vodafone they didn't use PPPoe (Just needed to enable a DHCP client on the interface to get an IP address).