Chorus chosen as key partner for UFB rollout

Forums › Spark New Zealand › Chorus chosen as key partner for UFB rollout

sidkumar

84 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Topic # 83948 24-May-2011 11:04

As per TCNZ, it covers 70% of the rollout.

http://www.telecom-media.co.nz/releases_detail.asp?id=3775&page=1&pagesize=10

1 | 2 | 3

192 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3

Reply # 473447 24-May-2011 13:53

+1 for using the correct name 'Chorus', unlike the mis-informed media who still believe Telecom won the contract. :)

hairy1

2690 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 346

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 473450 24-May-2011 14:02

Isn't Chorus owned by Telecom? ;-)

My views (except when I am looking out their windows) are not those of my employer.

Ragnor

8025 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 387

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 473459 24-May-2011 14:09

hairy1: Isn't Chorus owned by Telecom? ;-)

Has to structurally seperatre into two companies

http://www.med.govt.nz/upload/Seperation_Q&A.pdf

stevenz

2782 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 120

Reply # 473460 24-May-2011 14:11

So are TelstraClear still going to cry about it?

@KnightNZ

ObidiahSlope

191 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 26

Reply # 473471 24-May-2011 14:20

Betcha my local electorate National MP is not in the office answering the telephone today.

scorpiworld

192 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3

Reply # 473472 24-May-2011 14:21

hairy1: Isn't Chorus owned by Telecom? ;-)

Subtle but crucial different, they are owned by the Telecom Group :)

Reading Stuff comments most people are unhappy with Telecom Retail, not the company who won the UFB contract.

Edit: spelling mistake

robbyp

1163 posts

Uber Geek

Reply # 473474 24-May-2011 14:24

scorpiworld: +1 for using the correct name 'Chorus', unlike the mis-informed media who still believe Telecom won the contract. :)

Strictly speaking, it was telecom that won, as chorus is currently still a division of it, and it is owned by telecom on the sharemarket. However they will eventually become two seperate companies. This decision was always going to happen, otherwise telecom would have probably setup a competing network, and NZ can't afford two different networks. Also telecom has a lot of fibre already installed, so why setup duplication of networks.

Mushdaba

21 posts

Geek

Reply # 473492 24-May-2011 15:07

Love or hate Telecom, I guess that they were always the smartest choice in regards to constructing the majority of the UFB. As previously stated, had they not won, they most likely would've built their own, competing network. And the fact that they have a whole heap of the infrastructure already in place, whoever did get the UFB contract would have already been behind the eight ball.

I think it's in their best interests to do a decent job of it, lest they repeat mistakes of the past and become permanently tainted as simply useless.

scorpiworld

192 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3

Reply # 473514 24-May-2011 16:31

Mushdaba: Love or hate Telecom, I guess that they were always the smartest choice in regards to constructing the majority of the UFB. As previously stated, had they not won, they most likely would've built their own, competing network. And the fact that they have a whole heap of the infrastructure already in place, whoever did get the UFB contract would have already been behind the eight ball.

I think it's in their best interests to do a decent job of it, lest they repeat mistakes of the past and become permanently tainted as simply useless.

Agree completely, Telecom as brand has a very bad reputation (deserved or undeserved) but the recent Fibre to the cabinet programme by Chorus has proved very successful and lots of people are enjoying 10+Mb speeds (Not me unfortunately), but it gives me hope this UFB rollout will follow the same way. Chorus after all have a lot of fibre laid in the ground already.

What the various retail providers will offer in terms of packages and most importantly data cap limits (if any) is the next interesting piece of news. I think a model where you pay more for more speed (CIR) would work better, as any type of data cap can be chewed through using a 100Mb pipe.

old3eyes

7833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 783

Subscriber

Reply # 473522 24-May-2011 16:43

stevenz: So are TelstraClear still going to cry about it?

Wait for the full page adds in tomorrows papers..

Regards,

Old3eyes

hairy1

2690 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 346

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 473523 24-May-2011 16:45

Would any ISP insiders here (Snap, WXC...) be able to give a rough retail ballpark we as consumers could expect to pay based on the wholesale pricing? Not looking for any firm figures but based on past history.....

My views (except when I am looking out their windows) are not those of my employer.

Beccara

985 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 155

UberGroup

Reply # 473559 24-May-2011 18:04

There is some current UFB pricing around with us and xfnet.

We start at $79 for 10mbit/10gb with a phone line. Xfnet start at $79 for 10gb with a phone line and unknown speed (last time they said speed on their site it was 5mbit, could be 10mbit now, they dont say)

You'll see new plans comes out over the coming months as the monthly charge from the LFC is now locked down nationwide

Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated

LAC

103 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3

Reply # 473571 24-May-2011 18:47

I can't wait to see what happens with this.

codyc1515

1598 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user

Reply # 473578 24-May-2011 18:54

hairy1: Would any ISP insiders here (Snap, WXC...) be able to give a rough retail ballpark we as consumers could expect to pay based on the wholesale pricing? Not looking for any firm figures but based on past history.....

Did you read the page linked to in the OP? Quote:

"Pricing

The entry level wholesale price per month for a 30mbps plan will be $37.50 and a 100mbps plan will be $55. RSPs will not be charged connection fees for standard residential connections.

The wholesale rates mean that barriers to upgrade to a fibre connection have largely been removed as soon as it is available in an area. As such, we expect RSPs will seek to convert their customers to fibre as quickly as possible."

End quote. From what I read there, it sounds to me like plans will be speed based, another quote: "Plan pricing for end users will be decided by the RSPs".

hairy1

2690 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 346

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 473579 24-May-2011 18:56

Yes. This is a wholesale rate. It doesn't include any data or ISP margin.

My views (except when I am looking out their windows) are not those of my employer.

1 | 2 | 3