michaelmurfy:
@solutionz to be honest I think you're the only one asking for base64 photo uploads. It is lazy and hard to optimize for mobile and slower connections.
You'll be surprised the amount of posts I came across when this was enabled where a user would paste a massive, uncompressed image suitable for a massive 20 story billboard - worse I was on mobile when I often saw these posts (RIP Data). It was a mess and I am glad to see it gone.
Except there is zero correlation between front-end user experience and back-end storage requirements.
That is to say there's nothing stopping you from allowing copy+paste of an image (as base64) then resizing and/or converting to a file backend... on another thread @freitasm was said he was looking into this.
I'm talking about the copy+paste UX everone is used to, don't get caught up on the "base64" part.