Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


6328 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 391

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 150897 7-Aug-2014 00:51
Send private message

I have a Samsung S3 which was replaced in January last year under PhoneInsure.

Screen is now playing up, I'm assuming if there's a warranty, it'll only be for 12 months.  Can anyone confirm?

Create new topic
182 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 18

Subscriber

  Reply # 1103794 7-Aug-2014 08:26
One person supports this post
Send private message

Under NZ law, a warranty is largely irrelevant. The Consumer Guarantees Act protects you and if you get any grief, quote that. Effectively, the retailer is responsible for any defects for the length of its reasonable operating life. I'm pretty sure that it still applies to items replaced by insurance.

18315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5246

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1104254 7-Aug-2014 17:12
Send private message

sbowness: Under NZ law, a warranty is largely irrelevant. The Consumer Guarantees Act protects you and if you get any grief, quote that. Effectively, the retailer is responsible for any defects for the length of its reasonable operating life. I'm pretty sure that it still applies to items replaced by insurance.


This only applies if the item was purchased personally rather than through a company.

446 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 47


  Reply # 1104430 7-Aug-2014 21:28
Send private message

Telecom offers a 2yr warranty on current phones, and I feel like voda may as well. If they don't, the fact that telecom does would give you a pretty good basis to argue 2yrs was a reasonable longevity.

But yeah, I'd check with voda that you don't actually have a 2yr warranty.


18315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5246

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1104437 7-Aug-2014 21:33
Send private message

I am 90% sure the phones are 2 year warranties.


182 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 18

Subscriber

  Reply # 1104501 7-Aug-2014 22:51
Send private message

networkn:
sbowness: Under NZ law, a warranty is largely irrelevant. The Consumer Guarantees Act protects you and if you get any grief, quote that. Effectively, the retailer is responsible for any defects for the length of its reasonable operating life. I'm pretty sure that it still applies to items replaced by insurance.


This only applies if the item was purchased personally rather than through a company.


A check of the Consumer Affairs website shows that "goods supplied to you as the result of an insurance claim" are covered by the Act.

18315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5246

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1104503 7-Aug-2014 22:53
Send private message

sbowness:
networkn:
sbowness: Under NZ law, a warranty is largely irrelevant. The Consumer Guarantees Act protects you and if you get any grief, quote that. Effectively, the retailer is responsible for any defects for the length of its reasonable operating life. I'm pretty sure that it still applies to items replaced by insurance.


This only applies if the item was purchased personally rather than through a company.


A check of the Consumer Affairs website shows that "goods supplied to you as the result of an insurance claim" are covered by the Act.


Which doesn't apply to companies. The companies act is called the fair trading act and provisions are different. 


4288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 82

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1104552 8-Aug-2014 06:49
Send private message

Seems a few people here are guessing, and forgetting that the phone was replaced by an insurance company NOT the retailer.

When I was still working retail when offered extended warranties. If a product was replaced under that scheme you only got x days, or what was left of the original products warranty - whatever is greater of the two. It would stop there, as you had made use of the one off cost of that extended warranty. Ongoing insurance would obviously differ, presumably you still have the T&C's from when you first got the insurance?

182 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 18

Subscriber

  Reply # 1104555 8-Aug-2014 06:57
Send private message

networkn:
sbowness:
networkn:
sbowness: Under NZ law, a warranty is largely irrelevant. The Consumer Guarantees Act protects you and if you get any grief, quote that. Effectively, the retailer is responsible for any defects for the length of its reasonable operating life. I'm pretty sure that it still applies to items replaced by insurance.


This only applies if the item was purchased personally rather than through a company.


A check of the Consumer Affairs website shows that "goods supplied to you as the result of an insurance claim" are covered by the Act.


Which doesn't apply to companies. The companies act is called the fair trading act and provisions are different. 



Correct, if the purchaser was a company. But the point I was making at the outset is that if the purchaser was an individual and the item was replaced under insurance, then the CGA still applies from the date that it was replaced and the retailer that supplied the replacement phone is still bound by it for the reasonable lifetime of the phone. Both Consumer Affairs and the Consumers' Institute have quite a bit of information on their websites that cover this.

http://www.consumeraffairs.govt.nz/for-consumers/law/consumer-guarantees-act/goods-services-covered

4977 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1323

Trusted
Microsoft

  Reply # 1104568 8-Aug-2014 07:56
Send private message

Dealing with the insurance company behind Vodafone phoneinsure is a right royal pain

Quite happy to take my premiums for years, then an excess when I smashed my HTC Snap a few years ago ( Windows Mobile 6.5)

Unable to supply a replacement and unwilling to return my excess fee unless I can prove I paid it. Unable to tell me how it was paid so I can go to my bank for proof

Asses

876 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 37

Subscriber

  Reply # 1104736 8-Aug-2014 11:23
Send private message

I broke my iPhone 4 in the February 2011 Christchurch EQ - the screen shattered but I was still able to used it thanks to a Power Support USA film screen that was holding the whole thing in one piece - and the touch screen still worked!. Got it replaced via VF PhoneInsure and it took forever (I believe it was 6-8 weeks). The excess was $125 and the replacement was a refurbished one (I don't mind) - I could tell from the Serial #.

At the end of the day, it's great on paper but when it comes to the nitty gritty and you do the math, it's not worth it in the long run (IMO).

OP, was your replacement a refurbished one?





182 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 18

Subscriber

  Reply # 1104740 8-Aug-2014 11:28
Send private message

When buying these insurance policies, it's often worth thinking about whether your contents policy covers the phone. Many do.

21462 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4362

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1105673 9-Aug-2014 23:40
Send private message

A claim for a phone on your household policy will stuff your no claims discount, which IME is way more than the value of a phone less the excess they would cover you for.




Richard rich.ms

1774 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 621

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1105745 10-Aug-2014 08:59
Send private message

networkn:
sbowness:
networkn:
sbowness: Under NZ law, a warranty is largely irrelevant. The Consumer Guarantees Act protects you and if you get any grief, quote that. Effectively, the retailer is responsible for any defects for the length of its reasonable operating life. I'm pretty sure that it still applies to items replaced by insurance.


This only applies if the item was purchased personally rather than through a company.


A check of the Consumer Affairs website shows that "goods supplied to you as the result of an insurance claim" are covered by the Act.


Which doesn't apply to companies. The companies act is called the fair trading act and provisions are different. 



The consumer guarantees act does apply to B2B sales if they are goods that can be used for a normal domestic purpose. It doesn't apply to specialist commercial goods, goods sold in trade etc. To me a phone is normal domestic goods.

Businesses can contract out of the CGA to other businesses, but it needs to be done explicitly in their T&Cs.

http://www.consumeraffairs.govt.nz/for-business/compliance/quality-of-your-goods-or-services/goods-covered-by-consumer-guarantees-act

Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.