![]() ![]() |
tombrdfrd66: So I can well understand Xnet not bothering to cater for their customer's needs when there's nothing in it for them.
nate:
Hit the nail on the head with that one. Xnet would suggest an upgrade to a superior technology such as Araneo wireless or fibre if a customer was look for great than ADSL speeds.
nate:
tombrdfrd66: Expensive to set up? No. If we had a friend on fibre somewhere upstream who would run a web-proxy for us they could do it with a 400MHz i386 box. However it sounds as though it ought to be expensive so why miss the opportunity to fleece the flock.
nate:tombrdfrd66: So I can well understand Xnet not bothering to cater for their customer's needs when there's nothing in it for them.
Hit the nail on the head with that one. Xnet would suggest an upgrade to a superior technology such as Araneo wireless or fibre if a customer was look for great than ADSL speeds.
Sales Engineer
Snowflake
www.snowflake.com
about.me/nzregs
Twitter: @nzregs
nate:
I think we're talking about two very different things. What I think you are after is two separate ADSL connections which are paired together to gain speeds as though they were one connection.
If we are both on the same page, you need equipment at both ends - at the ISPs core and at your end. I believe Snap use Cisco gear, just mentioning the name is expensive.
![]() ![]() |