While I agree mobile data roaming charges are still daylight robbery, I can't really agree with all the reasoning in that post. Saying that he was using the mobile data because it seemed cheap on the first invoice?
Or "As I was later to discover, here is a real picture of the charges I had racked up, by what I thought was conservative use of my phone (mostly doing map lookups, and use of navigate while driving a hire car)"
Seriously. Using mobile data for Google Maps (or something similar) while driving overseas? One could easily solve this buy either a) buying a good $100 software (TomTom, Sygic, Alk and many others) or b) buy a GPS in-car navigation device. Both cases would save at least a couple thousand dollars on that roaming bill.
Now if someone knows this is an expensive exercise before it starts, why do it?
"Sure, sure, it's not like this is anything new or special, people have known about this for a long time. "highway robbery" writes one well-known industry commentator, showing that the mark-up is of the order of 100,000%. Yes, one-hundred, thousand percent. "Legal Theft", brands another. There are frequently stories in the papers, such as:
- 3News (article offline, I have only the synopsis) - Nicole Skews owes $6k after a month of using her phone overseas - $6000 Vodafone bill - what's up with that?
- Liz Price charged $3,500 for two hours of use
- Stories abound in this iPhone users forum
So, it's not like I'm not aware of all of this. Far from it, I was acutely aware, and did everything I could to try to avoid it - apart from doing the sensible thing, which was closing my Vodafone account and switching to a pre-pay provider so this can't happen."