![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I don't recommend registry cleaning after Windows XP where it was already difficult to show a real benefit. Registry management is much improved since then so I doubt you could show any significant benefit except by forcing an unusual configuration such as using less RAM than the specified Windows systems requirements.
fearandloathing:
Reg cleaning does nothing.
That comment needs some qualifying.
Registry cleaning was essential last century. For example, back when the registry file had a maximum size which was easily reached. I remember manual editing to reduce registry size being difficult, time-consuming and very risky so registry cleaners were really helpful in speeding up that activity.
21st century Windows systems only show a performance benefit in scenarios with severely constrained resources that approach one of Windows hard memory limits, like exhausting desktop heap in the WIN32 subsystem or creating a large non-paged pool.
Thanks for all the responses folks. As always there are a number of opinions, all credible. I will rely on Storage Sense and not bother with registry cleaning.
--
OldGeek.
Voyager referral code: https://refer.voyager.nz/
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |