![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
jtbthatsme: I always believed the standard drink was considered to be 200mls which means your daughter drunk 5.5 standard drinks.
Your daughter was right to wait 6 hours before driving but in reality the chances of her failing a blood test (for the zero amount someone at her age is allowed) would be highly probable. Whether or not she was let off or not would really boil down to the mood of the police officer at the time (sadly).
I also agree with the other comment it's irrelevant what sort of car she's driving as we all know accidents are not always our fault if she was in one that would have come out and there would be no letting off. I'm also pretty sure at her age she's not allowed to be drinking however I am not exactly going to say much on this as we've all been there done that prior to the legal age limit.
I would talk to her about pointing out what she did right (as waiting 6 hours is awesome most kids probably wouldn't) and what she could have done better (not taken the car if drinking, stayed the night, waited longer) and most definitely set rules for use of your car as I think possibly with her age being under 18 if something like a accident had happened you would possibly be in trouble as well and I don't just mean that you'd be uninsured paying for two cars to get fixed but you could see yourself getting placed on a parenting course for letting your child drink under age and then the drink drive part would just further some judges to put something like this for you or possibly both of you to do. (or does that stuff only happen in America).
nzkc: My understanding is that its not quite as black and white as nate says here. Yes it will count against her, however, the length of time since the conviction comes into play. Off hand I cannot remember the length of time that is taken into account - its in the act though.
jtbthatsme: I always believed the standard drink was considered to be 200mls which means your daughter drunk 5.5 standard drinks.
jtbthatsme: Your daughter was right to wait 6 hours before driving but in reality the chances of her failing a blood test (for the zero amount someone at her age is allowed) would be highly probable.
alasta:
In this case I personally believe that fatigue from only having had six hours sleep is far more likely to be a driving hazard than a small residual trace of alcohol which would be insufficient to affect judgement ability or reaction times
Hiamie:alasta:
In this case I personally believe that fatigue from only having had six hours sleep is far more likely to be a driving hazard than a small residual trace of alcohol which would be insufficient to affect judgement ability or reaction times
It's worse than that :(. She didn't have any sleep at all, and it was only by chance that she stopped drinking at midnight.
She intended to sleep over, and drive home much later in the day, but things didn't turn out that way.
I intend making sure that in future she doesn't drive until at least 6 hours have passed after her last drink, and if necessary, I will pick her up rather than have her try to drive home before at least 6 hours have passed.
stevenz: I know a guy who while the sober driver was getting breath-tested, asked the officer if they could test him as well "just out of interest" and he passed, despite being "pretty wasted" by his own definition and that there's no way he would've driven.
I have little faith in the accuracy of their equipment, although this was about 5 years back so maybe it's improved since.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |