Death to the trees!!!

Forums › Off topic › Death to the trees!!!

1 | 2

sidefx

3775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Trusted

#2093038 19-Sep-2018 10:33

MikeB4:

I will go out on a limb and suggest its a new branch of science.

At least they're getting to the root of the problem.

(Sorry, I know it's punacceptable but I tried really hard to resist, I swear...)

"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
- Richard Feynman

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018

#2093060 19-Sep-2018 11:14

sidefx:

(Sorry, I know it's punacceptable but I tried really hard to resist, I swear...)

Don't pine over it.

MikeB4 wood have been the instigator - not yew, even if there's tree fellas playing the game now.

tdgeek

30048 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9455

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2093063 19-Sep-2018 11:27

trig42:

I saw that headline on the Herald webpage yesterday, and thought to myself, how can trees (obviously outside your house) interfere with WiFi? They can't.

They can interfere with Wireless Broadband, which IMO is not WiFi.

If only the Herald had someone on their staff that could differentiate these things...

Exactly me too.

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018

#2093078 19-Sep-2018 11:52

tdgeek:

trig42:

I saw that headline on the Herald webpage yesterday, and thought to myself, how can trees (obviously outside your house) interfere with WiFi? They can't.

They can interfere with Wireless Broadband, which IMO is not WiFi.

If only the Herald had someone on their staff that could differentiate these things...

Exactly me too.

I'm not bothered much - what's presented includes an allegedly direct quotation from an expert:

"Trees can interfere with wi-fi - but all wireless is not created equal," he says.

Apart from that confusion over "Wi-fi", I thought otherwise the article was quite informative and well-written - to a pretty good standard.

Here's some more - the judge used also used the term "wi-fi" - and Keall is still clearly not understanding - by his comment about "use of wi-fi in the broad sense".

If you want to be pedantic - reply to the tweet.

dolsen

1483 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 319

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2093101 19-Sep-2018 12:46

Linux:

Trees are causing ' Interference ' I suggest they look up what ' Interference ' means in Radio terms

So now we have transmitting trees wiping out radio signals causing High I levels?

John

sidefx

3775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Trusted

#2093119 19-Sep-2018 12:58

I think @dolsen just won this thread.

"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
- Richard Feynman

HP

Shop now for HP laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

Tinkerisk

4798 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3660

#2093181 19-Sep-2018 14:44

dolsen:

The shade of green interferes with the desert. *g*

- NET: FTTH & VDSL, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT: thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D: two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter

xpd

Geek of Coastguard
14116 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4579

Retired Mod

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2093185 19-Sep-2018 14:47

I too would be terrified of all those dangerous transmissions hitting the tree, chop them all down I say.

XPD / Gavin

LinkTree

Tinkerisk

4798 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3660

#2093567 20-Sep-2018 07:12

xpd:

I too would be terrified of all those dangerous transmissions hitting the tree, chop them all down I say.

Bloody hell! Was that in your neighbor's garden? I'd maybe opt for a pole or tower to solve an 'interference' problem.

hio77

'That VDSL Cat'
13036 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3896

ID Verified

Trusted

Lizard Networks

Subscriber

#2093900 20-Sep-2018 15:50

So this one circled back to me... i pulled the numbers on issues that have been related possibly to trees on spark 4G Wireless broadband.

came out to be 0.4% of all faults logged with the callcentre.

That's an extremely rough number, and i could argue atleast half of even those cases aren't actually tree issues.

If you ask me that's pretty marginal. in many of these situations an alternative connection or fibre was provided too to ensure a quality experience.

the likes of @coffeebaron probably has a higher ratio of tree related issues given he's often doing rural installations.

#include <std_disclaimer>

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.

1 | 2