![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
roobarb: If the proximity card can be cloned by anyone other than the issuer or delegated authority then it is by definition an insecure system.
Martin Spencer mspencer@msa.co.nz
berridge: Thank you for all your comments.
Can anyone put me in touch with someone who can actually help me in this matter and clone my card for me?
Thanks.
Martin Spencer mspencer@msa.co.nz
Jaxson: We feel your pain though. This sounds like a classic lack of flexibility type situation, either via the operators, or via the software they are using.
Geektastic: Just being dumb, but if you are not there at the same time as the other person, why can't you just have two different cards?
andrew027: he just wants to be able to choose which vehicle he parks at any time.
Martin Spencer mspencer@msa.co.nz
sbiddle: I don't see how cloning the card would actually work. Any well implemented access system (and I've seen this with a number of systems while working at sites with card access systems for carparks) would refuse to open the barrier again to go in when it deemed that card has been used for a prior entry buy had not exited the building. Likewise if it was used to exit the carpark it would refuse a 2nd car out using the same card until it had detected a new entry. I would assume this is a fairly standard setup.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |