Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Yabanize
2350 posts

Uber Geek


  #2003384 27-Apr-2018 10:51
Send private message

frankv:

 

freitasm:

 

rugrat: I still don’t get what he was doing was illegal. There are other file sharing sites on internet. You Tube as already pointed out has copyright stuff on it, yet no one is going after these.

 

 

The problem was the alleged kickbacks paid to people who uploaded the content for sharing. This would break the safe harbour he had.

 

 

I think also that, when multiple people uploaded the same file, MegaUpload would only store it once, with multiple links to it. When RIAA identified an illegal upload, the link to the file would be deleted, not the file itself. RIAA would have to identify all the illegal uploads to get the file removed.

 

I suspect also that this was a bit of a test case; if they could nail MegaUpload, a cease-and-desist letter to another file sharer would be much more likely to have the desired result.

 

 

 

 

Sounds like it would be a great thing for efficiency of storage. Deleting all copies of the same file could be wreckless, for example what if someone has bought that mp3/movie for themselves and were storing it in Megaupload for their personal use (Remember MegaUpload was the predecessor to Dropbox/Google Drive) Members of the movie and music industry also used MegaUpload to transport files between each other, so what if their copies got deleted?

 

Heres some info on Viacom vs YouTube

 

Yes, it seems YouTube bent over backwards for Hollywood, policing it themselves now with content recognition when it shouldn't actually be their job and isn't required by the law




nunz
1421 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #2003459 27-Apr-2018 12:55
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

DaveB:

 

driller2000:

 

I had/have some sympathy for DotCom - for a couple of reasons:

 

1. The police have been dodge in their prosecution - illegal spying by them, invalid search warrants + illegal seizure of assets (subsequently overturned), withholding of evidence for his defence team etc.

 

2. If his version of events is correct ie. that he did take-down content that was claimed by others - and more than that, he gave these same organisations direct access to their servers so they could delete offending content as well - then that is a defence argument worth running. Possible challenges to seizure of assets in other territories ie. Hong Kong - suggest other courts see flaws in the prosecution case.

 

3. The raid was completely over the top - Armed Raid + 76 Cops + 2 Helicopters ?? - he's a large wealthy German - not Dr No.

 

4. The way our govt of the day kow-towed to the US was embarrassing - esp re extradition to the US. It should have been done in accordance with fair and due process. Clearly they haven't - or we wouldn't be tied up in knots 6 years later.

 

 

 

Comments:

 

Yes I know MegaUpload was used for sharing copyrighted material. But his claim that you give the speeding ticket to the driver of the offending car - NOT the owner of the road. 

 

 

 

So yeah ....he is great example of greed and excess - but whatever - he has right to justice like we all do - and to date I don't think that has been the case.

 

 

Best post I have seen on Geekzone about Kim Dotcom. Well done.

 

 

The owner of the road analogy was not that good. A better analogy would be ticketing the owner of a road that offered drivers a financial inducement to speed.

 

 

 

 

The issue is that the US are trying to nail him for mega upload - yet their own Safe Harbor(sic) Act gives him protection by saying that an ISP or similar cannot be held to account for traffic traveling through their system or the use made of their system.

 

An analogy is Spark getting prosecuted for child porn because a pedophile used them as their ISP. When they pedophile views porn that porn travels through and is stored (cached servers) in Sparks equipment so the reality is they have and store child porn.

 

Mega Upload did comply with requests to remove materials and so fulfilled their obligations under the law.

 

The unspoken issue is KDC giving a nod and a wink to the whole process. He pitched his services in ways that encouraged copyright breaches and was cynically obeying the letter of the law while completely flouting the spirit of the law.

 

 

 

That said, no matter how heinous anything KDC has done ( Allowing music and videos to be stored on his servers just like Youetube and a ton of others who also breach the copyright acts) , that doesn't make righteous any action against him at any cost. NZ is in gross breach of many of our own laws - and that needs to be dealt with harshly to safe guard what we hold as important - e.g. integrity of police process and equal justice for all. KDC might have more advantages than some, but the police and other breaches went well beyond the norm to work against him.

 

 


loceff13
1065 posts

Uber Geek


  #2003524 27-Apr-2018 14:08
Send private message

frankv:

 

freitasm:

 

rugrat: I still don’t get what he was doing was illegal. There are other file sharing sites on internet. You Tube as already pointed out has copyright stuff on it, yet no one is going after these.

 

 

The problem was the alleged kickbacks paid to people who uploaded the content for sharing. This would break the safe harbour he had.

 

 

I think also that, when multiple people uploaded the same file, MegaUpload would only store it once, with multiple links to it. When RIAA identified an illegal upload, the link to the file would be deleted, not the file itself. RIAA would have to identify all the illegal uploads to get the file removed.

 

I suspect also that this was a bit of a test case; if they could nail MegaUpload, a cease-and-desist letter to another file sharer would be much more likely to have the desired result.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yep MU hashed each file uploaded to save storage space and not store duplicates, that being said if you look at the MP3Tunes legal case(extremely similar in terms of file storage methods and DMCA law arguments) the failure to delete the file(or remaining links to it) did not exclude them from safe harbor protection iirc. I could be wrong but my memory was they won their case but ultimately lost with a personal damages claim against the founder.

 

 

 

Whats interesting about todays cloud services(dropbox, google drive etc) is they also hash the files uploaded and block the option to 'share' any file that has received a valid dmca claim against it. I guess that avoids the issue entirely.




Yabanize
2350 posts

Uber Geek


  #2003678 27-Apr-2018 17:13
Send private message

loceff13:

 

frankv:

 

freitasm:

 

rugrat: I still don’t get what he was doing was illegal. There are other file sharing sites on internet. You Tube as already pointed out has copyright stuff on it, yet no one is going after these.

 

 

The problem was the alleged kickbacks paid to people who uploaded the content for sharing. This would break the safe harbour he had.

 

 

I think also that, when multiple people uploaded the same file, MegaUpload would only store it once, with multiple links to it. When RIAA identified an illegal upload, the link to the file would be deleted, not the file itself. RIAA would have to identify all the illegal uploads to get the file removed.

 

I suspect also that this was a bit of a test case; if they could nail MegaUpload, a cease-and-desist letter to another file sharer would be much more likely to have the desired result.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yep MU hashed each file uploaded to save storage space and not store duplicates, that being said if you look at the MP3Tunes legal case(extremely similar in terms of file storage methods and DMCA law arguments) the failure to delete the file(or remaining links to it) did not exclude them from safe harbor protection iirc. I could be wrong but my memory was they won their case but ultimately lost with a personal damages claim against the founder.

 

 

 

Whats interesting about todays cloud services(dropbox, google drive etc) is they also hash the files uploaded and block the option to 'share' any file that has received a valid dmca claim against it. I guess that avoids the issue entirely.

 

 

One could so easily modify the file a tiny bit to get a new hash in the same way they split up a file into many to get around the 100mb limit for rewards


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
79314 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #3272197 15-Aug-2024 18:44
Send private message

Justice Minister signs Kim Dotcom’s extradition order | RNZ News

 

 

Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has told Kim Dotcom, the former Mega Upload owner, that New Zealand will deport him to the US.

 

 

 

 

 

But Dotcom can appeal this decision, and in a statement he said he would.

 

 

😠





Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync 


quickymart
13974 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

  #3272201 15-Aug-2024 18:55
Send private message

Just deport him and get it over with already. I don't know what value he adds to the country, really.


Rikkitic

Awrrr
18667 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #3272211 15-Aug-2024 19:19
Send private message

I wonder if they will have any more luck with him than the US had with Assange?

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


 
 
 

Move to New Zealand's best fibre broadband service (affiliate link). Free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE. Note that to use Quic Broadband you must be comfortable with configuring your own router.

gzt

gzt
17160 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #3272221 15-Aug-2024 19:34
Send private message

Rikkitic: I wonder if they will have any more luck with him than the US had with Assange?

Assange vs USA govt = trouble
DotCom vs MPAA/RIAA + USA govt = double trouble

ezbee
2406 posts

Uber Geek


  #3272235 15-Aug-2024 20:20
Send private message

Is TAB running a book on if Kim will ever leave

 

We gave Peter Thiel a Passport for $1M donation.

So far on Kim we have probably spent a number of millions in legal costs.
Maybe we should just say, pay us back our costs plus a few million and we forget it.
Equip a Hospital or something. Charge him rent of $x per year to stay proceedings.

Given the extradition would still apply everywhere else he has to stay here and spend his money here.

Just tell USA our justice department ran out of money 
and unless they are paying more than Kim will we can't help.

No worries we are keeping him in our open prison for life for them.
We are nice that way saving them cost of court cases and appeals in USA.


elpenguino
3427 posts

Uber Geek


  #3272290 15-Aug-2024 23:46
Send private message

Interesting that he is being pursued so vigorously for what is essentially a civil law suit.

 

And for this most heinous alleged crime of letting people transport copies of hollywood movies he could spend the rest of his life in a concrete box with actual criminals. The whole thing seems way overblown by the americans.





Most of the posters in this thread are just like chimpanzees on MDMA, full of feelings of bonhomie, joy, and optimism. Fred99 8/4/21


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
79314 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #3272291 15-Aug-2024 23:52
Send private message

elpenguino:

Interesting that he is being pursued so vigorously for what is essentially a civil law suit.


And for this most heinous alleged crime of letting people transport copies of hollywood movies he could spend the rest of his life in a concrete box with actual criminals. The whole thing seems way overblown by the americans.



It's not piracy only.

"Along with three co-defendants, Dotcom was indicted by a US grand jury on a range of charges including conspiracy to commit racketeering, wire fraud, conspiracy to infringe copyright on a commercial scale and money laundering"




Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync 


eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
8875 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #3272301 16-Aug-2024 03:21
Send private message

IMO he’s a self-entitled smartA and it’s time he got his comeuppance.





Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


Goosey
2836 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #3272303 16-Aug-2024 06:40
Send private message

Do we need a badge for the day this all happens to mark “we were here”.

 

 

 

what would the badge graphic be?  (The classic silhouette of the group)?

 

 

 

anyhow, I was living in Auckland when there was that nice donated fireworks display and I’m sure everyone appreciated that…because we were all none the wiser…

 

 

 

thanks for that, thanks for the interesting news events….

 

cya later Mr D.C.

 

 

 

 


cddt
1565 posts

Uber Geek


  #3272305 16-Aug-2024 07:03
Send private message

nunz:

 

The unspoken issue is KDC giving a nod and a wink to the whole process. He pitched his services in ways that encouraged copyright breaches and was cynically obeying the letter of the law while completely flouting the spirit of the law.

 

 

He should have just waited a decade and dressed up his business in "AI" clothing. The CEO of Microsoft AI has said re any content on the web: "Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it. That has been freeware, if you like."

 

I don't see the black helicopters coming for a Microsoft CEO... 





My referral links: BigPipeMercury


Batman
Mad Scientist
29770 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3272308 16-Aug-2024 07:19
Send private message

cddt:

 

He should have just waited a decade and dressed up his business in "AI" clothing. The CEO of Microsoft AI has said re any content on the web: "Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it. That has been freeware, if you like."

 

I don't see the black helicopters coming for a Microsoft CEO... 

 

 

very similar comparison is Elon Musk & Elizabeth Holmes

 

both have companies that promise something that doesn't work

 

one gets billions in govt grants while the other is jailed for 11 years

 

one of the products is still sold! and still doesn't work, may or may not be causing fatal crashes!


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.