![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
KiwiNZ:mdooher:joker97: yeah, everybody who support JC i suggest they too try that on their boss and post here what happens. ok? ;p
Does slamming them up against the wall and explaining how the world really works count? If so, then the result was a better understanding of the world by the boss.
I think he became a better person for it.
That is battery and again serious misconduct that should result in dismissal.
kiwitrc:KiwiNZ:mdooher:KiwiNZ: If this occurred as reported in a team I was managing it would have resulted in dismissal.
I would give them 1/2 a day off and $200 to go to the pub and sort out their differences, After all chances are it was the one getting punched that need the firing anyway.
I will never reward violence and bullying in the work place. I regard it as serious misconduct that will result in dismissal.
If I was in your team I would beat myself up.
KiwiNZ:kiwitrc:KiwiNZ:mdooher:KiwiNZ: If this occurred as reported in a team I was managing it would have resulted in dismissal.
I would give them 1/2 a day off and $200 to go to the pub and sort out their differences, After all chances are it was the one getting punched that need the firing anyway.
I will never reward violence and bullying in the work place. I regard it as serious misconduct that will result in dismissal.
If I was in your team I would beat myself up.
So you think violence and bullying in the work place is OK
jonathan18: It's weird to see this defence of Clarkson and his actions, when I think they're really indefensible.JimmyC:Whilst I certainly do not condone physical violence toward a co-worker, I think the BBC has become way to PC these days...
Seriously? By suggesting it's somehow alright that Clarkson attacked another BBC worker (or at least suggesting it's not a good enough reason to not renew his contract) I'd say that is getting close to saying physical violence is ok or acceptable in such cases. or perhaps it should be tolerated because he's important and the BBC needs him more than he needs them?
JimmyC:jonathan18: It's weird to see this defence of Clarkson and his actions, when I think they're really indefensible.JimmyC:Whilst I certainly do not condone physical violence toward a co-worker, I think the BBC has become way to PC these days...
Seriously? By suggesting it's somehow alright that Clarkson attacked another BBC worker (or at least suggesting it's not a good enough reason to not renew his contract) I'd say that is getting close to saying physical violence is ok or acceptable in such cases. or perhaps it should be tolerated because he's important and the BBC needs him more than he needs them?
What I'm saying is the reason this incident was the last straw for Clarkson was because of his previous infractions that were deemed racist. In that regard I believe the BBC has become too PC, along with a lot of people but that's another topic. If he'd had a squeaky clean slate up to this point I doubt the incident would have made the light of day, being settled in house. I'm not saying that's the right way to do it, but money has a way of changing lots of things.
KiwiNZ:mdooher:joker97: yeah, everybody who support JC i suggest they too try that on their boss and post here what happens. ok? ;p
Does slamming them up against the wall and explaining how the world really works count? If so, then the result was a better understanding of the world by the boss.
I think he became a better person for it.
That is battery and again serious misconduct that should result in dismissal.
Matthew
mdooher:KiwiNZ:mdooher:joker97: yeah, everybody who support JC i suggest they too try that on their boss and post here what happens. ok? ;p
Does slamming them up against the wall and explaining how the world really works count? If so, then the result was a better understanding of the world by the boss.
I think he became a better person for it.
That is battery and again serious misconduct that should result in dismissal.
Considering what he did to deserve such a reaction he would have been fired as well. So what was better? Me getting him fired? Firing both of us, or the two of us sorting it together in a way that was clearly understood by both of us and moving on?
KiwiNZ:mdooher:KiwiNZ: If this occurred as reported in a team I was managing it would have resulted in dismissal.
I would give them 1/2 a day off and $200 to go to the pub and sort out their differences, After all chances are it was the one getting punched that need the firing anyway.
I will never reward violence and bullying in the work place. I regard it as serious misconduct that will result in dismissal.
Matthew
KiwiNZ:mdooher:KiwiNZ:mdooher:joker97: yeah, everybody who support JC i suggest they too try that on their boss and post here what happens. ok? ;p
Does slamming them up against the wall and explaining how the world really works count? If so, then the result was a better understanding of the world by the boss.
I think he became a better person for it.
That is battery and again serious misconduct that should result in dismissal.
Considering what he did to deserve such a reaction he would have been fired as well. So what was better? Me getting him fired? Firing both of us, or the two of us sorting it together in a way that was clearly understood by both of us and moving on?
keeping your hands to yourself, walking away and use the complaints process to deal with it like responsible adults.
Matthew
tdgeek:
BBC too PC? I don''t follow that at all. The previous, many infractions weren't just racist, he ran down disabled people as well. He is just abusive. Is he really like that in reali life? Probably not, he is loud and obtuse as that's his TV qualification. The BBC have put up with a great number of nasty infractions, so in effect, the BBC are not very PC at all, in fact rthe opposite, but it's now gone over the line. Punching a guy cos of an issue with a steak? Amazing
mdooher:KiwiNZ:mdooher:KiwiNZ: If this occurred as reported in a team I was managing it would have resulted in dismissal.
I would give them 1/2 a day off and $200 to go to the pub and sort out their differences, After all chances are it was the one getting punched that need the firing anyway.
I will never reward violence and bullying in the work place. I regard it as serious misconduct that will result in dismissal.
Why not help people instead of punishing them? Wouldn't it be better for everyone if the beer worked?
Zero tolerance policies are just an excuse for people to avoid having to back their decisions. " I don't make the rules, I just enforce them" etc
Matthew
mdooher:KiwiNZ:mdooher:KiwiNZ:mdooher:joker97: yeah, everybody who support JC i suggest they too try that on their boss and post here what happens. ok? ;p
Does slamming them up against the wall and explaining how the world really works count? If so, then the result was a better understanding of the world by the boss.
I think he became a better person for it.
That is battery and again serious misconduct that should result in dismissal.
Considering what he did to deserve such a reaction he would have been fired as well. So what was better? Me getting him fired? Firing both of us, or the two of us sorting it together in a way that was clearly understood by both of us and moving on?
keeping your hands to yourself, walking away and use the complaints process to deal with it like responsible adults.
Running to the teacher solves nothing
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |