![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Software Engineer
(the practice of real science, engineering and management)
A.I. (Automation rebranded)
Gender Neutral
(a person who believes in equality and who does not believe in/use stereotypes. Examples such as gender, binary, nonbinary, male/female etc.)
...they/their/them...
Also, allowing some people to have an advantage if they brought their own equipment whilst others lost out because they could not afford it would I think be a form of descrimination I suspect.
gzt: If you followed those links earlier, you would see these problems have been overcome in practice. Combination of keen parents, involved community, $15 per month cost, and a project to provide jobs to kids to help pay for it. Win/Win.
Procrastination eventually pays off.
I think your mistaken that netbooks or tablets at school will have full internet access. They will be following strictly education system curriculae and clearly will not be there for kids to access what they want, both for distraction and inappropriate content issues
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync
Opinion & Commentary, from Mike Usmar, CEO of Computer Clubhouse, NZ & Pacific
Computers do not help children learn!
This statement is similar to the argument “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” – as the debate this week swirls around whether schools should have compulsory Ipads, or the next latest device. I fear we have forgotten that it is humans, both young and old, that empower technology, not the other way round.
There appears to be an assumption that a computer can be the magic bullet that will swoop in and miraculously provide the desperately required educational reform that our schools and communities here in NZ and across the globe need as they advance into the 21st century.
A few years ago Nicholas Negroponte launched a global campaign to ensure that every child living in poverty had a low cost laptop. This idea generated much excitement, and it still does today in some quarters. It wasn’t until I actually sat down with Nicholas in his Boston office in 2006, about a year after he launched One Laptop Per Child, that I realised that even he had fundamentally lost sight of the immense capacity for children to hunt down and seek out new learning that is principally inspired through the power of human interaction in the real world with teachers, mum’s, dads, grandparents and friends.
Then the focus turned to not only getting computers into the hands of every child, but providing internet access to every community so that users can talk to each other in the virtual world, and access vast amounts of data and knowledge. Once again, this prospect seems to excite people and dominants the focus of most countries today as they launch into the deployment of broadband infrastructure.
Surprisingly though, we do things quite differently at Computer Clubhouse, an organisation targeting youth in underserved communities through the creative use of technology. After bringing into each community we work with ultra-fast broadband and the very best technology we can afford at a community Clubhouse, we turn off the internet, power down the computer or laptop, turn off texting and instant messaging and do something quite old fashioned, yet has proven to be singularly the most effective tool we’ve found, to power all these technologies…..that is encouraging young people to talk about and listen to each other’s ideas and passions, and thereby releasing their creative talents.
There is no technology or algorithm that delivers the extraordinary results we see every day in Clubhouse when young people are able to build from a base of strong social, cultural and creative capital that each one of them brings to the table, regardless of where they live, their school decile rating, or whether they have a computer at home or not.
The assumption that we must teach our children and families computer skills so they can be better learners is false. It is that assumption which fuels the rise of “experts” delivering computer literacy courses to families, and “e-learning” inside class-rooms, becomes yet one more thing over-burdened teachers need to incorporate into lessons plans. Practically speaking, young people are not only more early adopters of technology than we adults, they can rapidly pass on new knowledge and skills to other young people and those around them (including their own teachers!). Educationalist then try to assess this truly 21st century approach to learning against rigid and limited learning standards that frankly fall short of the high-tech digital competencies our children and communities are building.
This practice of standardisation arose from the Industrial Age, when industrial schools were created to feed a cloned work force into factories. One of the most powerful pieces of research I’ve read was released in April of this year by our very own Chief Science Advisor to the New Zealand Prime Minister, Sir Peter Gluckman, in his report “Looking Ahead: Science Education for the Twenty First Century”, where he succinctly identifies the modern skills our young people need in order to bring about a competitive advantage for our country. He writes;
“The hierarchical, bureaucratic management styles that characterised industrial age enterprises are being replaced by flatter, more distributed management systems in which all employees are expected to play a role in understanding and improving the organisation’s products or performance. Where industrial age organisations required workers who were diligent, respected authority and took direction, today’s organisations need people who are adaptable and autonomous and can quickly learn new skills. They need people who can communicate their knowledge to others, build relationships and work in teams. They need people who can solve problems and who can take responsibility for all parts of a project”
So the limited singular intelligence model that sits as the over-arching force of our education system is becoming increasingly less relevant not only to our students who sit in the system, but also to the employers who will hire these kids when and if they graduate. Alvin Tofler in his book Future Shock, way back before the Internet was even invented, describes it like this:
"The illiterate of the 21st Century will not be those who cannot read or write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn."
Technology and the digital age is more than ever enabling and empowering young people to build on skill sets that are akin to multiple intelligences and multiple forms of literacy such as those Gluckman highlights in his report, and are perfectly attuned to what a modern socially connected broadband economy should look like. , This is indeed where our future sits as a small island state looking to trade our smarts and kiwi-can-do spirit into the globally connected digital market place.
So before we go out and invest in the latest piece of technology, perhaps we should look at the assets we Kiwi’s already have in abundance-- creative talent and our ability to think out-side the box-- and promote and celebrate learning environments where teachers and parents act as curators of talent; and where ideas are sparked from old fashioned habits such as respect for others, conversations, and relationship building. Perhaps one of the coolest things about technology and being connected is that new learning can now occur so much more, anywhere, anytime.
Mike Usmar
Computer Clubhouse
www.computerclubhouse.org.nz
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |