Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


joutei

308 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 9


#133660 29-Oct-2013 21:01
Send private message

Hey guys,

Sorry for the noob question, hopefully some of you car guru's can help me out.

Basically I have a Mazda Axela 2006 1500cc. I've been using 91 in the car for about 2 months.
One of my friends recommended I try 95 as it will help the engine run smoother and I may get more k'ms of it.

The fuel cap on my car doesn't specify what octane, what do you guys think ? 

Also is bad to keep switching from 95 to 91 , I'm assuming yes but I will wait for an answer :) .



View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
lxsw20
3689 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2174

Subscriber

  #923795 29-Oct-2013 21:03
Send private message

Being an import I'd go 95.



Inphinity
2780 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1184


  #923808 29-Oct-2013 21:26
Send private message

I doubt you'll see any improvement in using a higher octane than 91, as the 1500cc is not a particularly high-compression engine, though it also won't hurt. There should be no issue switching between 91 and 95 in an engine that doesn't need the higher octane rating.

scuwp
3927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510


  #923814 29-Oct-2013 21:33
Send private message

It should run happily on either although most imports are designed for higher octane fuels.

Personally I am in the higher octane camp. I believe it burns better and cleaner and the vehicles run better on better quality fuel. There is a slight improvement in economy offsetting the higher cost (let the debate begin).

Fuel octane has been debated a couple of times on GZ already.







Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation





johny99
495 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 61
Inactive user


  #923815 29-Oct-2013 21:33
Send private message

don't use 91, wouldn't use BP or Gull either, but that is just me.

richms
29098 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10208

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #923817 29-Oct-2013 21:35
Send private message

Whats the issue with BP? I know I wont let gull's muck near my car...




Richard rich.ms

johny99
495 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 61
Inactive user


  #923824 29-Oct-2013 21:39
Send private message

was waiting for that, find them (BP) to be on high side in terms off price,

HP

 
 
 
 

Shop now for HP laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
johnr
19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526
Inactive user


  #923826 29-Oct-2013 21:41
Send private message

91 is fine for the car they are not a high compression engine

johny99
495 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 61
Inactive user


  #923828 29-Oct-2013 21:43
Send private message

if you like ping use 91. different strokes for different folks I guess

johnr
19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526
Inactive user


  #923834 29-Oct-2013 21:54
Send private message

johny99: if you like ping use 91. different strokes for different folks I guess



Do you know what the compression ratio for the engine is and also what the timing is set to?

Most modern cars have a knock sensor and will adjust timing advance to counter the engine knock

Inphinity
2780 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1184


  #923835 29-Oct-2013 21:55
Send private message

scuwp: 
Personally I am in the higher octane camp. I believe it burns better and cleaner and the vehicles run better on better quality fuel. There is a slight improvement in economy offsetting the higher cost (let the debate begin).



Octane rating is not necessarily fuel quality, it's simply a measure of how much compression the fuel can withstand before detonating. Running too low an octane fuel for the engine will cause pre-detonation (the fuel will detonate early in the combustion cycle), causing loss of performance and efficiency. Provided the fuels used are able to withstand the engine's compression, higher octane won't by itself lead to any improvements in running - unless the engine is one of those (fairly common now, admittedly) capable of adjusting timing etc to accommodate for different fuels. That said, conversely there is no issue in using a higher octane fuel than the engine requires, and it will certainly result in better performance and economy than too low a rated fuel. Japanese standards require 'Regular' octane to be at least 90 RON, and premium to be 100. Of course, we tend to have 91, 95, or 98 here.

lxsw20
3689 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2174

Subscriber

  #923849 29-Oct-2013 22:16
Send private message

johnr:
johny99: if you like ping use 91. different strokes for different folks I guess



Do you know what the compression ratio for the engine is and also what the timing is set to?

Most modern cars have a knock sensor and will adjust timing advance to counter the engine knock


Economy car doesn't always equal low compression with direct injection systems. Kock sensors can only do so much at the end of the day.

 
 
 

Shop now at Mighty Ape (affiliate link).
johnr
19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526
Inactive user


  #923852 29-Oct-2013 22:20
Send private message

lxsw20:
johnr:
johny99: if you like ping use 91. different strokes for different folks I guess



Do you know what the compression ratio for the engine is and also what the timing is set to?

Most modern cars have a knock sensor and will adjust timing advance to counter the engine knock


Economy car doesn't always equal low compression with direct injection systems. Kock sensors can only do so much at the end of the day.


These cars are not known for high compression or high performance they are a run around car in japan but with nice looks not like the 2.0 and 2.3SP

lxsw20
3689 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2174

Subscriber

  #923859 29-Oct-2013 22:35
Send private message

I own an MPS I know they aren't the performance one. I was more pointing out that with direct injection systems it is not always the case they will be a low compression engine or run properly lower quality fuel. Mitzi GDI systems and Toyota D4 systems do not handle 91 well at all for example.

joutei

308 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 9


  #923896 29-Oct-2013 23:54
Send private message

Seems like there is mixed opinions, Well I poured $20 95 tonight.

Car seems to be running smoother, lets see how the milage goes.

Overall It seems like it does not matter which fuel is used ?

xpd

xpd
Geek of Coastguard
14115 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4574

Retired Mod
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #923919 30-Oct-2013 06:52
Send private message

We purchased an imported 04 Nissan Wingroad (1500cc) a few years ago and got told "yeah, 91 is fine" - nope. After a couple of weeks, started hearing the dreaded ping.... switched to 95 and that went away and the car ran a lot smoother.

In my Legacy, didnt use anything but 95+. Didnt want to run the risk of 91 killing it ;)

Pretty much Japan has higher octane fuels than us (min for them is 95/98 I think), so usually best to just keep with that.




XPD / Gavin

 

LinkTree

 

 

 


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.