
From the Huffington Post. Click on the "Cadbury Crème Egg" for an unpleasant surprise
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/29/easter-candy-calories-nutrition-info_n_2974958.html?utm_hp_ref=@food123]
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Who cares??
Regards,
Old3eyes
old3eyes:Who cares??
One day, probably doesn't matter. I'd limit the amount given to kids though, and I don't personally want any.
Just be wary of anything you read in the Huffington Post; It is not well known for investigative journalism.
They could be correct in this instance, but they were not very specific with the description of the additives.
Personally, I would be more concerned about the sugar. It is in literally everything that isn't picked straight from the garden. I certainly feel no need to consume it in pure form wrapped in chocolate or any other flavouring, whether it comes from beaver bums or not.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
This is a can of worms in these parts on several levels. For example, I would hate to do a germ swab of the meat shelves in some of the supermarkets I have been in.
Apparently they have yet to discover sealed tray packaging technology, so blood and so on is busy dripping all over those shelves in a food safety disaster - since I doubt they have rigidly enforced, adequately supervised cleaning regimes.
Apparently a little sheep faeces in the Havelock North water supply wasn't enough to notice while drinking it. Gee, I wonder why all those people got sick?
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
PaulBags: Yeah but did they really science that? If they had they probably would have found nastys beyond acceptable levels - or never had them in the first place. Nice try though :p.
Water provision appears to run on the Amateur Hour Principle as far as I can see.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |