Australian govt wants 100 percent mobile coverage.
Australian govt wants 100 percent mobile coverage.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Australian government wants 100 percent mobile coverage through Starlink.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
SaltyNZ:
Australian government wants 100 percent mobile coverage through Starlink.
Pretty much as how I read it...
But as always the magic is in "who pays"
Although do remember there's an election in a couple of months in OZ,
and parties will promise heaven and earth to get your tick in their box...
Whether such policies survive post election senate wrangling with independents is yet to be seen...
SaltyNZ:
Australian government wants 100 percent mobile coverage through Starlink.
Correct I should have said Starlink.
Is this the same government that also made a complete shambles of the NBN roll out?
Senecio:
Is this the same government that also made a complete shambles of the NBN roll out?
No. No , That was a DIFFERENT Government, we're better than them... trust us...
Senecio:
Is this the same government that also made a complete shambles of the NBN roll out?
No, it's the other lot.
Not that you'd notice, really: both sides are equally clueless on technology matters
wellygary: Although do remember there's an election in a couple of months in OZ,
and parties will promise heaven and earth to get your tick in their box...
With their recent electoral "reforms" there's effectively only two parties left, so it's just A or B, and they can always forget about this promise the minute they're elected, too expensive, too hard, the other side proposed it not us, etc.
Senecio:
Is this the same government that also made a complete shambles of the NBN roll out?
The previous Labor govt had FTTP planned (with 1gb/s), then when they got booted out, the libs then changed it to FTTC as it was considerably cheaper. Every time I’m there, I laugh at how much of a joke it is. People who have HFC there sre the lucky ones.
Aucklandjafa:
The previous Labor govt had FTTP planned (with 1gb/s), then when they got booted out, the libs then changed it to FTTC as it was considerably cheaper. Every time I’m there, I laugh at how much of a joke it is. People who have HFC there sre the lucky ones.
No they're not, as they cant get the FTTP upgrade like the crap connection people can. Still not available everywhere and they still act like upload bandwidth is a scarce resource to have matching plans between HFC and real fibre but it is rapidly improving over there.
They will get there in the end, years behind NZ. They did some things right tho, like forced copper withdrawl a lot faster than NZ lets people drag it on for.
I think 100% coverage is a great idea. And if it costs the telcos a lot to provide it thru starlink to areas they decide are not worth building in, then also good as that will incentivize them to build there own sites in those locations.
richms:
I think 100% coverage is a great idea. And if it costs the telcos a lot to provide it thru starlink to areas they decide are not worth building in, then also good as that will incentivize them to build there own sites in those locations.
Be careful what you wish for though. Pre-COVID an easy site on the side of the road in suburbia could easily cost more than $300K just for the actual installation, let alone all the pre-work before you get to that point. Someone - and by 'someone' I mean 'the subscribers' have to pay for those sites out in the middle of nowhere.
Satellite is the best option. Whether a satellite service owned by Elon Musk is the best satellite is debatable. But the cost of 100% terrestrial is ridiculous. Nobody would do it because nobody could pay for it. There's a reason RCG is a three-way joint venture.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
OK, I take that back - Telstra might do it as they have a history of getting whatever they want from the government, so they would probably be able to get the government to pay for it. Which is just "the subscribers" with extra steps.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
SaltyNZ:
OK, I take that back - Telstra might do it as they have a history of getting whatever they want from the government, so they would probably be able to get the government to pay for it. Which is just "the subscribers" with extra steps.
Same as the hole country will not be connected with Hi band 5g. By the way will any mobile networks here in NZ upgrade to 5G stand alone.
ajw:
By the way will any mobile networks here in NZ upgrade to 5G stand alone.
Sure, eventually. When? No idea.
The kinds of services that require a 5G SA network don't really seem to have much interest as far as I can see. There's the container port building a private 5GC but other than that I don't hear much clamour.
For you, normal subscriber with a phone, there is zero practical difference between 5G NSA and 5G SA.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
ajw:
Same as the hole country
Was that a clever "dig" at Australia being heavily into mining :)
MikeFly:
ajw:
Same as the hole country
Was that a clever "dig" at Australia being heavily into mining :)
I saw it as a Freudian slip about the general quality of the country :)
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |