mikenzb: My 0 attenuation comes and goes. sometimes it will sync with 1, others it'll sync with 0..

Dairusire:

mikenzb: My 0 attenuation comes and goes. sometimes it will sync with 1, others it'll sync with 0..

Why your not on 17a I don't know.....

Dairusire:

mikenzb: My 0 attenuation comes and goes. sometimes it will sync with 1, others it'll sync with 0..

Why your not on 17a I don't know.....

hio77:

stevehodge: 

I haven't seen any indication that the initial DLM testing period has any impact on the move to 17a. You're already on DLM-1 so I'm not sure a reset will achieve anything for you.

if i recall you didnt have the best error rates before you went 17a, what were your CRCs averaging?

stevehodge:

hio77:

stevehodge: 

I haven't seen any indication that the initial DLM testing period has any impact on the move to 17a. You're already on DLM-1 so I'm not sure a reset will achieve anything for you.

if i recall you didnt have the best error rates before you went 17a, what were your CRCs averaging?

Anything from about 0.5 - 6 per minute. Typically less than 2 but we thought the DLM-1 limit was lower then though. I had some weird syncs before going to 17a, with reduced SNRM and increased error rate.

hio77:

stevehodge:

hio77:

stevehodge: 

I haven't seen any indication that the initial DLM testing period has any impact on the move to 17a. You're already on DLM-1 so I'm not sure a reset will achieve anything for you.

if i recall you didnt have the best error rates before you went 17a, what were your CRCs averaging?

Anything from about 0.5 - 6 per minute. Typically less than 2 but we thought the DLM-1 limit was lower then though. I had some weird syncs before going to 17a, with reduced SNRM and increased error rate.

odd.. 

still trying to decided if i should resync and see it go stable *hopefully* or not..



im sitting at 6CRCPM, with the 15min counter sitting more at 7.4CRCPM


IIRC, thats pretty boarderline for DLM-1 which is rather concerning considering all the work that has been done on my line at this point..



@hitman, whats your spec looking like?

hio77: was giving it a few hours before posting so there was an actual graph to look at..

i do agree though, the rates themselves look to be to increasing.. on the graph its solid however.. (reasonably)

still.. it seems absurdly high for a connection thats 271M (electrically calculated) from the cabinet inwhich there has been fresh wire ran from the ETP, and the lead-in has been repaired.

stevehodge:

hio77: was giving it a few hours before posting so there was an actual graph to look at..

i do agree though, the rates themselves look to be to increasing.. on the graph its solid however.. (reasonably)

still.. it seems absurdly high for a connection thats 271M (electrically calculated) from the cabinet inwhich there has been fresh wire ran from the ETP, and the lead-in has been repaired.

Yeah, it seems to be consistent around 7/min, which seems quite high given that there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with the line.

Time to downgrade the firmware I reckon!