![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
callum62: Really curious as to what the explanation will be on not digging up dirt
Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?
Matt East
graemeh:afe66:graemeh: Downers are dropping the scoping visit. I'm not sure if this process change has happened yet or not.
This just means the first site visit they need to agree the install method with you and then just do it. It should be better in most places except ones like Wellington where they need permission from someone else for most installs (as they use the power poles)
I disagree.
When you are making long term decisions about your property, drilling holes etc there should be time to think about the consequences of what is proposed.
Avoiding a site visit to scope things out will result in a poorer finish. There are enough people posting here poor installs to show this is a bad idea.
When I can get fibre, I will show where I want the cable to run in my property and if there is an extra charge so be it, but no one is going to turn up and dictate cable run location without a realistic discussion of options.
(in my case I will need to run conduits in the roof space to a central cupboard location and not place the ONT on the rooms facing the street which are all small bedrooms)
A.
I agree with what you are saying about thinking about the install but you don't really get this with the separate scoping visit. The scoper comes and discusses options with you and then asks you to agree to a plan. This shouldn't change with the new process and if anything should be better as the person you agree the install with is the installer so nothing is lost between the scoper and the installer.
You may need conduit in the roof space but a UFB installer can advise on that one. In our install they used a combo cable that has copper and fibre. Outside the cable goes in conduit but under the house it is just stapled in place in the same way an electrical cable can just be stapled inside.
afe66:graemeh:afe66:graemeh: Downers are dropping the scoping visit. I'm not sure if this process change has happened yet or not.
This just means the first site visit they need to agree the install method with you and then just do it. It should be better in most places except ones like Wellington where they need permission from someone else for most installs (as they use the power poles)
I disagree.
When you are making long term decisions about your property, drilling holes etc there should be time to think about the consequences of what is proposed.
Avoiding a site visit to scope things out will result in a poorer finish. There are enough people posting here poor installs to show this is a bad idea.
When I can get fibre, I will show where I want the cable to run in my property and if there is an extra charge so be it, but no one is going to turn up and dictate cable run location without a realistic discussion of options.
(in my case I will need to run conduits in the roof space to a central cupboard location and not place the ONT on the rooms facing the street which are all small bedrooms)
A.
I agree with what you are saying about thinking about the install but you don't really get this with the separate scoping visit. The scoper comes and discusses options with you and then asks you to agree to a plan. This shouldn't change with the new process and if anything should be better as the person you agree the install with is the installer so nothing is lost between the scoper and the installer.
You may need conduit in the roof space but a UFB installer can advise on that one. In our install they used a combo cable that has copper and fibre. Outside the cable goes in conduit but under the house it is just stapled in place in the same way an electrical cable can just be stapled inside.
I suppose Im just a little nervous about someone turning up on the day and having to decide there any then what to do and doing it.
If its a roof install, I have to get the conduit in the ceiling and down into the cupboard vrs if its a underground install, you are looking at 20m+ of concrete cutting on a sloping section to the leaking, cracked garage or 10m of concrete cutting to under the house but there are no power points there, which I doubt the bloke in the chorus van can do either.
A.
Spoke to the neighbours last night (just to let them know I didnt approve or even know it was going to be installed that way)
graemeh:afe66:graemeh:afe66:graemeh: Downers are dropping the scoping visit. I'm not sure if this process change has happened yet or not.
This just means the first site visit they need to agree the install method with you and then just do it. It should be better in most places except ones like Wellington where they need permission from someone else for most installs (as they use the power poles)
I disagree.
When you are making long term decisions about your property, drilling holes etc there should be time to think about the consequences of what is proposed.
Avoiding a site visit to scope things out will result in a poorer finish. There are enough people posting here poor installs to show this is a bad idea.
When I can get fibre, I will show where I want the cable to run in my property and if there is an extra charge so be it, but no one is going to turn up and dictate cable run location without a realistic discussion of options.
(in my case I will need to run conduits in the roof space to a central cupboard location and not place the ONT on the rooms facing the street which are all small bedrooms)
A.
I agree with what you are saying about thinking about the install but you don't really get this with the separate scoping visit. The scoper comes and discusses options with you and then asks you to agree to a plan. This shouldn't change with the new process and if anything should be better as the person you agree the install with is the installer so nothing is lost between the scoper and the installer.
You may need conduit in the roof space but a UFB installer can advise on that one. In our install they used a combo cable that has copper and fibre. Outside the cable goes in conduit but under the house it is just stapled in place in the same way an electrical cable can just be stapled inside.
I suppose Im just a little nervous about someone turning up on the day and having to decide there any then what to do and doing it.
If its a roof install, I have to get the conduit in the ceiling and down into the cupboard vrs if its a underground install, you are looking at 20m+ of concrete cutting on a sloping section to the leaking, cracked garage or 10m of concrete cutting to under the house but there are no power points there, which I doubt the bloke in the chorus van can do either.
A.
You are right the Chorus techs don't install power points.
I'm sure when the scoper arrives they should be able to come up with something. If you're not comfortable with the solution you could always tell them you need to think about it rather than approving it on the spot. This will delay your install but at least you will have time to think things through.
Whatifthespacekeyhadneverbeeninvented?
DarthKermit: I might have to set up a business digging trenches since the big guys are getting out of it now.
callum62: Sorry, cant edit my last post above
just a thought - I am the only one down the drive that has requested fibre install
Is it really necessary to surface run the other 2 cables for the neighbours, just incase they want it? The big thick white conduit on the left hand side of the drive looks terrible, and its only there 'just incase' as that cable is unrelated to myself
My other 65+ year old neighbour apparently told the contractor not to leave cable for her as she has no interest - and yet a bundle has been left attached to the other neighbours fence
is that common practice?
Id totally understand remedial work being done if any digging was invloved etc - but they are surface ran
Yabanize:callum62: Sorry, cant edit my last post above
just a thought - I am the only one down the drive that has requested fibre install
Is it really necessary to surface run the other 2 cables for the neighbours, just incase they want it? The big thick white conduit on the left hand side of the drive looks terrible, and its only there 'just incase' as that cable is unrelated to myself
My other 65+ year old neighbour apparently told the contractor not to leave cable for her as she has no interest - and yet a bundle has been left attached to the other neighbours fence
is that common practice?
Id totally understand remedial work being done if any digging was invloved etc - but they are surface ran
Its there for the future, She might not get it right now but might in the future or future tenants might.
Chorus isn't gonna keep the copper network live forever either.
It doesnt make any sense to just do one of the houses in the driveway when they are all going to need to be done in the future, may aswell get it done while they're there
That makes me about as angry as people who build new houses but dont do structured data wiring because 'they dont think they need it'
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |