![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
networkn: There is a LOT of terminology in that document, it's pretty mind boggling :0
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
Talkiet:networkn: There is a LOT of terminology in that document, it's pretty mind boggling :0
It's not possible to precisely describe something as complex as UFB without using a lot of domain specific terms unfortunately. I don't think there's a lot of rocket science in that doc but it can be daunting at first glance...
Any specific terms that don't make sense?
Cheers - N
networkn: Well I can't make head nor tail of it, how I am supposed to know what the services required for the type of connection I want are?
networkn: When they talk about terminates (What a weird way to describe connection), a 100Mbps/50Mbps Bitstream 2 (What is that) I presume they are talking about putting a point at the customer site to connect the ethernet router to? Why would a 100/50 have a 2.5Mbps Symetrical CIR?
networkn: I see Bitstream 2, 3, 3a, 4, E-NNI Port Handover, MOFDF, Direct Fibre Access Service. That's just in 1 Paragraph or two!
I guess that since I can't have UFB right now, I am looking at a P2P Bitstream 4, which is 100Mbps at $380 and if I only want 30Mbps, then the minimum base fee to connect me using the stuff I have access to right now is still $380+GST + Data, + Margin +Misc other charges) , as I understand it?
Seems like Minimal connection will be $600 which is about what I have been looking at.
What is Multicast ongoing fee?
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
networkn: I guess what I was trying to achieve, what determining what the basic costs were, to determine if what I am being quoted by my RSP is correct. Seems like it probably is, though it's a little unfortunate I guess that the price is SO much different to the UFB pricing. I do understand it's a P2P, so not directly comparable. One option is to see if my neighbours want to share some of the costs in exchange for jumping on the connection too. I presume that these prices aren't going to significantly drop in the recent future, so if I want to jump before UFB, then I may as well jump sooner rather than later? Is that a fair assessment?
Thanks for your assistance and patience.
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
networkn: I guess what I was trying to achieve, what determining what the basic costs were, to determine if what I am being quoted by my RSP is correct.
If you have a business need for fibre today, then go for it... As has been pointed out these were recently dropped dramatically to be in line with UFB pricing. It's conceivable that competition in the RSP space may drive prices down a little with UFB P2P availability... But that's a total unknown - there's also a chance that the extra investment may mean prices through RSPs are higher than today... Again a guess, but not an impossibility.
Cheers -N
networkn:
If you have a business need for fibre today, then go for it... As has been pointed out these were recently dropped dramatically to be in line with UFB pricing. It's conceivable that competition in the RSP space may drive prices down a little with UFB P2P availability... But that's a total unknown - there's also a chance that the extra investment may mean prices through RSPs are higher than today... Again a guess, but not an impossibility.
Cheers -N
I guess the problem is that I don't see the prices that have been dramatically reduced, bringing the prices in line with UFB (At least the prices offered by Orcon etc. Since they are such different services (Shared vs P2P) I am not sure how they are comparing them, to decide what the in line price is.
It's moot I guess since I can't control the pricing, but frustrating non the less.
Cheers
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
networkn: Ah ok, and that clarifies the misunderstanding. I had understood there was just UFB pricing, and it was a set of guidelines on price for a specific set number of connections and data plans. I wasn't aware that UFB had P2P Equivalent products, since there has been nothing mentioned at that point about it. I think it's a fair enough misunderstanding given the lack of information.
When Chorus surrendered it's existing Fibre network to allow that to be used at reduced prices in line with "UFB pricing", I think most people would have assumed they would see the existing network prices being in line with the business plans offered by Orcon and WXC to date.
I guess we just need to wait and see what other options become available.
Is it your understanding that if you get a 100/50 plan through Orcon business, it will be based on GPON potentially with only a guaranteed speed of 2.5Mbps?
Cheers
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
networkn:[snip]
When Chorus surrendered it's existing Fibre network to allow that to be used at reduced prices in line with "UFB pricing", I think most people would have assumed they would see the existing network prices being in line with the business plans offered by Orcon and WXC to date.
[snip]
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
networkn: I thought even ADSL2+ had higher minimums than that? Isn't the threshold 4Mbps down?
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |