![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
webwat: I don't think Voda is interested in structural separation to do it - a prerequisite for UFB.
pchs:
In Christchurch (not sure about Wellington) a large amount of the HFC network deployment is on power lines, whereas the fibre network is being deployed below ground, so the fibre network will be more reliable, very little if any fibre was broken in the earthquakes.
nickb800:Things have to done in layers anyway, lowest being wastewater then mains water and then storm water. At the least broken laterals would have to fixed before UFB could be installed, that's part of the first layer, wastewater. After each layer the road & footpaths gets the cheapest fill and cover until all services on a road are complete, that will probably be another 5 years. And at that point patchy roads are the best Christchurch will have in some places for a good long while. State highways will get the best and quickest proper resurfacing, and that's still years away from complete.Sideface:nickb800: If VF was willing to wholesale its HFC on CFH terms, then why not push HFC areas of Christchurch and Wellington to the final year of the UFB rollout?
Now is the logical time to upgrade Christchurch to UFB, whilst everything is being rebuilt.
You'd think so, but aside from SCIRT coordinating road/water/wastewater/storwater rebuild, it seems that Enable are doing their own thing anyway
sbiddle:pchs:
In Christchurch (not sure about Wellington) a large amount of the HFC network deployment is on power lines, whereas the fibre network is being deployed below ground, so the fibre network will be more reliable, very little if any fibre was broken in the earthquakes.
UFB is being deployed both below ground and overhead. It just depends on the local infrastructure.
A lot has been made of North Power and their "fast" rollout of UFB. They have a network that's mostly overhead, and being the local lines company they also own the poles.
sbiddle:pchs:
In Christchurch (not sure about Wellington) a large amount of the HFC network deployment is on power lines, whereas the fibre network is being deployed below ground, so the fibre network will be more reliable, very little if any fibre was broken in the earthquakes.
UFB is being deployed both below ground and overhead. It just depends on the local infrastructure.
A lot has been made of North Power and their "fast" rollout of UFB. They have a network that's mostly overhead, and being the local lines company they also own the poles.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |