![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Ragnor: Kordia have been trying to raise funding for NZ leg of PIPE
Pacific Fibre have been raising funding to build their cables
If SXC is overpriced and a cash cow, surely these cables would of had a solid business case and been built by now?
Ragnor: Kordia have been trying to raise funding for NZ leg of PIPE
Pacific Fibre have been raising funding to build their cables
If SXC is overpriced and a cash cow, surely these cables would of had a solid business case and been built by now?
lucky015: Especially for something in the Billion dollar range with potential delays in returns and a large number of environmental and legal hoops to jump through across multiple countries and states...
DonGould:That's AU-NZ though isn't it? I'd say there would be a lot of hesitation from everyone about bulk traffic being routed through AU, I'd expect a lot of potential for undercutting and it would be preferred for secondary traffic only and also battling with the existing and probably fairly underused (As it has primarily unused backup capacity) SXC AU-NZ capacity.lucky015: Especially for something in the Billion dollar range with potential delays in returns and a large number of environmental and legal hoops to jump through across multiple countries and states...
PPC-2 is only a $60m investment.
lucky015:
I'm inclined to wonder if the reason behind the lack of competitors in the market is not actually due to lack of potential profits but rather due to there being no possibility of certain companies buying their services due to things like Telecom ownership of SXC and various other restrictive long term business deals already signed.
lucky015: probably fairly underused (As it has primarily unused backup capacity) SXC AU-NZ capacity.
Ragnor:lucky015: probably fairly underused (As it has primarily unused backup capacity) SXC AU-NZ capacity.
NZ'ers are primarily consuming US content not AU content. Additional AU-NZ links may not really help reduce end user pricing and definitely wouldn't help performance (NZ > AU > US) vs NZ > US).
SXC pricing for AU - US is the same as NZ - US.
Ragnor:lucky015: probably fairly underused (As it has primarily unused backup capacity) SXC AU-NZ capacity.
NZ'ers are primarily consuming US content not AU content. Additional AU-NZ links may not really help reduce end user pricing and definitely wouldn't help performance (NZ > AU > US) vs NZ > US).
SXC pricing for AU - US is the same as NZ - US.
What we really need is pacific fibre, which looks to be proceeding well with getting funding and signing founding users.
http://pacificfibre.net/news/
DonGould:Ragnor:lucky015: probably fairly underused (As it has primarily unused backup capacity) SXC AU-NZ capacity.
NZ'ers are primarily consuming US content not AU content. Additional AU-NZ links may not really help reduce end user pricing and definitely wouldn't help performance (NZ > AU > US) vs NZ > US).
SXC pricing for AU - US is the same as NZ - US.
What we really need is pacific fibre, which looks to be proceeding well with getting funding and signing founding users.
http://pacificfibre.net/news/
What we really need is both.
A duopoloy isn't going to help.
We had VF and T for years... how did that pan out? Then we got 2D... how's that panning out?
lucky015:
I don't know if 2D has really done that much for the Mobile market, They have pushed things along a bit but they haven't really changed thing all that much...
Fraktul: Many of your points come back to the same premise - more users using more data will result in lower prices.
Fraktul: That is simplistic
Fraktul: and just not true,
insane: Yup, please follow Don's advise, ISPs love selling you data (up to a point), it's once of the only areas an ISP can make some margin so go hard!
insane: The reason we're slowly seeing larger data caps now being implemented is nearly solely down to increased caching of international content and the removal of the handover limits previously imposed on ISPs. The price of international bandwidth does have some part to play, but honestly not as much as you'd think.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |