![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
Run from within windows 10 via some batch files i made, one per server i test to
The thing is it reports max speed to local servers so its not as though its a limitation of the CLI interface
Jase2985:
Run from within windows 10 via some batch files i made, one per server i test to
The thing is it reports max speed to local servers so its not as though its a limitation of the CLI interface
No, but depending on how it's handing the tcp scheduling there may be something funky.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
hio77:
No, but depending on how it's handing the tcp scheduling there may be something funky.
Like I've said multiple times - Windows just isn't good at this and going via WSL is no better.
This really needs to be run on a capable Linux host. I highly doubt there is actually an issue with this connection.
Regarding iCloud I've noticed that Apple prefer IPv6 connections. @Jase2985 perhaps get Voyager to enable IPv6 and configure this on your network.
I'm darn serious about the Windows problem. Especially in the upload department Windows just isn't good with TCP Scheduling and Killer Ethernet cards are much, much worse here. I remember a number of years ago I had an Alienware laptop with Killer Ethernet. I uninstalled all the Killer related stuff and only used the vanilla driver as this netted far better performance.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
@michaelmurfy This is posting from with Ubuntu 20.10. Next to no difference to LA.
2D LA
2D Sydney
For Comparison Chorus Fiber Labs, Auckland
I will try on a laptop thats running an Intel Ethernet adapter and see if there is any difference, but the results above clearly show its not a windows issue.
@Jase2985 This is what I mean when I say I think the issue is on your end - I seriously can't replicate it on a Voyager Gigabit connection:
This was done on a Synology NAS so a pretty poor example as the NAS is in use and its network connection is somewhat saturated but there you go. On the upload I could get over 300Mbit each time.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
@michaelmurfy and thats find but im trying to understand where there issues lies on my end if in fact it is my end.
You said use Linux i have with no change, the only common factor is the hardware, but thats been proven to do gigabit speeds. so what else could it be? i get TCP has its limitations but it seems as though im up against a hard wall with about 200-250mbps to the US, it ramps up really fast to those speeds then just flat stops and goes backwards. Downloads are what i would call fine, 850mbps to New York.
I have tried a different computer with a different network adapter under Linux and have the same thing going on. is it my hardware or something in voyager on my profile?
Australia is fine, local is fine, the US is not.
I would like to try and understand.
Who's your LFC?
N.
Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.
Jase2985:
@michaelmurfy and thats find but im trying to understand where there issues lies on my end if in fact it is my end.
You said use Linux i have with no change, the only common factor is the hardware, but thats been proven to do gigabit speeds. so what else could it be? i get TCP has its limitations but it seems as though im up against a hard wall with about 200-250mbps to the US, it ramps up really fast to those speeds then just flat stops and goes backwards. Downloads are what i would call fine, 850mbps to New York.
I have tried a different computer with a different network adapter under Linux and have the same thing going on. is it my hardware or something in voyager on my profile?
Australia is fine, local is fine, the US is not.
I would like to try and understand.
@Jase2985 do you have access to a VPN? Can you VPN to another location in NZ and then try. I don't think it sounds like you have a hardware issue. Sounds like a routing issue to me.
@michaelmurfy I used wget on MacOS, on a wired network and my router is capable of gigabit speeds.
@nzpaul What router are you using? Like I said, even if a router is "capable" of Gigabit speed it doesn't mean it can route it correctly.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
@michaelmurfy custom dedicated x86 router. It should be vastly more powerful than what is needed for gigabit.
@Talkiet:
Who's your LFC?
N.
Chorus, with voyager as the RSP
cant specify where the VPN end point is in NZ.
The VPN exits onto the same route that my voyager connection takes so it makes next to no difference in speed.
VPN off
C:\Users\Home>tracert speed5.snap.net.nz
Tracing route to speed5.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.13]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 10.5.0.1
2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 180.149.231.201
3 2 ms 2 ms 3 ms as23655.akl.ix.nz [43.243.21.30]
4 126 ms 126 ms 126 ms 14.43.69.111.static.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.14]
5 126 ms 126 ms 126 ms waldorf.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.13]
Trace complete.
VPN on
C:\Users\Home>tracert speed5.snap.net.nz
Tracing route to speed5.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.13]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms lo-vprn-100.br1.mdr.vygr.net [114.23.3.255]
3 4 ms 2 ms 3 ms ae-0-621.cr1.mdr.vygr.net [114.23.3.230]
4 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms as23655.akl.ix.nz [43.243.21.30]
5 127 ms 128 ms 128 ms 14.43.69.111.static.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.14]
6 128 ms 128 ms 128 ms waldorf.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.13]
Jase2985:
@Talkiet:
Who's your LFC?
N.
Chorus, with voyager as the RSP
cant specify where the VPN end point is in NZ.
The VPN exits onto the same route that my voyager connection takes so it makes next to no difference in speed.
VPN off
C:\Users\Home>tracert speed5.snap.net.nz
Tracing route to speed5.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.13]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 10.5.0.1
2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 180.149.231.201
3 2 ms 2 ms 3 ms as23655.akl.ix.nz [43.243.21.30]
4 126 ms 126 ms 126 ms 14.43.69.111.static.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.14]
5 126 ms 126 ms 126 ms waldorf.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.13]
Trace complete.
VPN on
C:\Users\Home>tracert speed5.snap.net.nz
Tracing route to speed5.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.13]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms lo-vprn-100.br1.mdr.vygr.net [114.23.3.255]
3 4 ms 2 ms 3 ms ae-0-621.cr1.mdr.vygr.net [114.23.3.230]
4 4 ms 3 ms 3 ms as23655.akl.ix.nz [43.243.21.30]
5 127 ms 128 ms 128 ms 14.43.69.111.static.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.14]
6 128 ms 128 ms 128 ms waldorf.snap.net.nz [111.69.43.13]
and i point back to my comment before... not that i'm saying any one entity is or is not at fault to be clear.
That or @Talkiet has some sort of internet gods fault on a certain LFC 🤔🤔
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |