Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Zeon

3916 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#151116 14-Aug-2014 12:37
Send private message

Hey guys,
Saw this come up on the NZNOG (NZNOG is a group of all the network operators e.g. ISPs in the country) - it looks like the number of "routes" on the internet is close to overloading some older routers. There's a good explanation here but to explain it briefly, the internet is made up of "routes" which tell you how to reach different IP addresses. Your computer or network will have an IP address and the service you connect to like Facebook will have another. The routes tell your computer how to reach Facebook. The number of routes is expanding, older Cisco routers have a maximum of 512,000 supported routes but the number has already reached 500,000 and for a brief period went over 512,000 causing parts of the internet to "go dark" from others.

it will be interesting to see those who are running older systems and not proactively monitoring them drop offline as their limits are hit.

http://www.bgpmon.net/what-caused-todays-internet-hiccup/




Speedtest 2019-10-14


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
Ragnor
8218 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1108606 14-Aug-2014 18:36
Send private message

Interesting, bet there are a lot of providers sitting too long on old gear.



alexx
867 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1108640 14-Aug-2014 20:29
Send private message

More here:
http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/08/internet-routers-hitting-512k-limit-some-become-unreliable/

Some older routers kept their routing tables in "a type of memory known as ternary content-addressable memory, or TCAM. Unlike typical RAM, content-addressable memory allows software to provide content and to recall the address of the memory. Such operations are much faster using binary CAM than RAM."

It seems that in some cases, the routing tables reached the 512K limit of many of those older routers.




#include <standard.disclaimer>


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
79250 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1108642 14-Aug-2014 20:32
Send private message

Expect the mainstream media to hit with headlines that are as good as something out of Buzzfeed. From the Herald (syndicated):

"Fears internet is running out of space as eBay crashes"




Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSyncBackblaze backup




muppet
2566 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1108659 14-Aug-2014 20:37
Send private message

This has been known about for at least a few months (well, a lot longer, but discussed in earnest for a few months)

The sky isn't falling, it's just people who haven't planned being affected.

muppet
2566 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1108663 14-Aug-2014 20:43
Send private message

Zeon: The number of routes is expanding, older Cisco routers have a maximum of 512,000 supported routes but the number has already reached 500,000 and for a brief period went over 512,000 causing parts of the internet to "go dark" from others.


That's not quite true.  Older Cisco routers by default partition their routing table to support 512k IPv4 routes.  It's possible to support more, at the expense of other (IPv6, L2 MAC) address entries.  The problem is that to reconfigure the router's TCAM (It's forwarding table memory), a reboot is required. If you' had a router up for 2 years, you're understandable nervous about rebooting it, especially because of this issue.

Inphinity
2780 posts

Uber Geek


  #1108666 14-Aug-2014 20:58
Send private message

muppet:
Zeon: The number of routes is expanding, older Cisco routers have a maximum of 512,000 supported routes but the number has already reached 500,000 and for a brief period went over 512,000 causing parts of the internet to "go dark" from others.


That's not quite true.  Older Cisco routers by default partition their routing table to support 512k IPv4 routes.  It's possible to support more, at the expense of other (IPv6, L2 MAC) address entries.  The problem is that to reconfigure the router's TCAM (It's forwarding table memory), a reboot is required. If you' had a router up for 2 years, you're understandable nervous about rebooting it, especially because of this issue.


That's where redundancy and alternate routes comes in, though... surely no major network provider is relying on a single router for any major operations these days?

muppet
2566 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1108669 14-Aug-2014 21:09
Send private message

Inphinity: 
That's where redundancy and alternate routes comes in, though... surely no major network provider is relying on a single router for any major operations these days?


It's not a redundancy issue.  It's the fact that if your routers receive over 512k routes, they'll black-hole the routes they couldn't accept.  It doesn't matter if they have 1 router or 16, if they're all the same router and they all receive routing updates from their upstream that push them over their limit, they'll be affected.

 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
Inphinity
2780 posts

Uber Geek


  #1108671 14-Aug-2014 21:11
Send private message

muppet:
Inphinity: 
That's where redundancy and alternate routes comes in, though... surely no major network provider is relying on a single router for any major operations these days?


It's not a redundancy issue.  It's the fact that if your routers receive over 512k routes, they'll black-hole the routes they couldn't accept.  It doesn't matter if they have 1 router or 16, if they're all the same router and they all receive routing updates from their upstream that push them over their limit, they'll be affected.


No, but I meant in relation to the 'risk' of a reboot.

muppet
2566 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1108675 14-Aug-2014 21:17
Send private message

Inphinity: 
No, but I meant in relation to the 'risk' of a reboot.


Oh right - then yes, I agree with you.  A reboot shouldn't be a (big) deal.  I guess it's more that "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" thing.  Though now it actually is broke.

Behodar
10501 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1108686 14-Aug-2014 21:28
Send private message

It shouldn't be too hard to drain it...


gjm

gjm
808 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1108791 15-Aug-2014 08:20
Send private message

I hope someone consulted the elders of the internet and asked them to add more jigaflops to the cloud some I can keep watching my cat videos on youtube




Do surveys for Beer money (referral link) - Octopus Group 

 

Link for buying beer (not affiliated, just like beer) - Good George


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
79250 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1108804 15-Aug-2014 08:52
Send private message

Oh, dear. IT Crowd video required at this moment:



I guess if mainstream media non-tech journalists watching this wouldn't get the joke anyway.






Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSyncBackblaze backup


macuser
2120 posts

Uber Geek


  #1108848 15-Aug-2014 09:56
Send private message

The internet needs to cut down on bytes, it's gaining in size quickly!!


PhantomNVD
2619 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1110093 17-Aug-2014 20:15
Send private message

But more importantly for a 1-cable country like ours... apparently SHARKS are attacking the internet too!!!

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=11309925

investigative scare tactics at it's best (note the 2005 date on the video) aren't we so lucky that it hasn't happened here in the last 10 years since that video was taken? (!)

insane
3236 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1110108 17-Aug-2014 20:51
Send private message

PhantomNVD: But more importantly for a 1-cable country like ours... apparently SHARKS are attacking the internet too!!!

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=11309925

investigative scare tactics at it's best (note the 2005 date on the video) aren't we so lucky that it hasn't happened here in the last 10 years since that video was taken? (!)


The SX cable has two rings, will take at least two hungry sharks attacking unshielded sections to cause serious concern.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.