On our street fibre is only laid underground along the west side. All power poles on that side are prepped for hanging fibre aerially across the street for properties on the east side regardless of whether the east side house will be overhead or underground.
We read our Chorus website and asked the Chorus contractors that visited our site about changing from aerial to underground and we were told that if we trenched from the house to the closest point on our boundary we would not have to pay. So we trenched and laid the conduit. A cost of $69 for a site visit and $196 for cabling was then quoted in writing to complete the installation.
Completely out of left field Chorus then announced they wanted an extra $2000 for our proposed overhead to underground installation to pay for work beyond our boundary to run cable down the street pole plus 9 metres under the grass berm and the 1m wide concrete footpath to the point on the boundary it enters our pre-laid conduit.
Our installation is in all other respects a bog standard residential installation on a flat site with easy access for the internal installation between EPT and ONT with absolutely no costly remedial work.
Questions:
1. Is this a standard cost?
2. Why does the side of the street dictate what one pays for a standard UFB installation?