Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


scuwp

3927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510


#99569 22-Mar-2012 08:35
Send private message

Some more stellar reporting from Stuff, but might be open slather on infringement notices if the PC politics see their way through.  

Movie studios are about to push the Government to lower the fees they have to pay internet providers to out copyright pirates under the so-called "Skynet" law that took effect last year.

The Economic Development Ministry has kicked off a promised review of the $25 fee that rights holders must pay internet providers to send infringement notices to customers accused of piracy under the "three strikes regime".

Tony Eaton, head of the New Zealand branch of the Motion Picture Association, NZFact, said the issue was on his "to do" list next week and it would call for the fees to be lowered or done away with altogether.

The Recording Industry Association, which represents record companies, is understood to have paid internet providers to send out hundreds if not thousands of infringement notices.

However, it is not clear if any internet users have yet received a "third strike" that could see them hauled in front of the Copyright Tribunal and fined up to $15,000.

A Justice Ministry spokesman said it believed a number of people had received second warning notices but no applications had yet been made for enforcement action by the tribunal.

Eaton said members had been dissuaded from requesting any infringement notices because of the cost.

"The fees have always been a concern for us and we will be putting in a submission."

InternetNZ chief executive Vikram Kumar saw no need for the fees to change, saying the ministry's discussion paper acknowledged that internet providers were only being partially compensated for the cost of sending out infringement notices as it stood.

Submissions on the fee review close at the end of next month.

 




Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
sidefx
3775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Trusted

  #598526 22-Mar-2012 10:02
Send private message

Not that I've followed it too closely, but have they reviewed the "3 strikes" aspect of the law? If not why on earth are they reviewing this first, when a UN report signed by 40 nations criticised the 3-strikes part of the law as a violation of human rights?




"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there."         | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
              - Richard Feynman




stevenz
2802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  #598527 22-Mar-2012 10:07
Send private message

What could they do if the government just told them to "go jump"?

Not that it'd ever happen for fear of upsetting the Amurrikahns.




nzkc
1634 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041


  #598550 22-Mar-2012 10:23
Send private message

To me this sounds like: its ok for us (the consumer) to have to put up with their high prices but its not ok for them to have to put up with our high prices.

Sour grapes much?



CYaBro
4708 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1182

ID Verified
Trusted

  #598552 22-Mar-2012 10:25
Send private message

ISPs are probably already making a loss on the $25 they get paid to go and retrieve all the information required and send out the notice.
Why should they lose more money?




Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


lucky015
746 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 182

ID Verified
Trusted

  #598557 22-Mar-2012 10:30
Send private message

nzkc: To me this sounds like: its ok for us (the consumer) to have to put up with their high prices but its not ok for them to have to put up with our high prices.

Sour grapes much?


Exactly, If the NZ government is going to sell out to the U.S the least we can do is match their prices.

kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 833
Inactive user


  #598560 22-Mar-2012 10:37
Send private message

Why not just pass the $25 (x3) fee onto the accused after they have been found guilty after 3 strikes.

 
 
 
 

Shop now on Samsung phones, tablets, TVs and more (affiliate link).
BlueShift
1692 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 969


  #598564 22-Mar-2012 10:40
Send private message

kiwitrc: Why not just pass the $25 (x3) fee onto the accused after they have been found guilty after 3 strikes.


I think "fined up to $15,000" probably covers that. 

kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 833
Inactive user


  #598578 22-Mar-2012 10:54
Send private message

BlueShift:
kiwitrc: Why not just pass the $25 (x3) fee onto the accused after they have been found guilty after 3 strikes.


I think "fined up to $15,000" probably covers that. 


Yeah but the poor starving Movie Studios don't get any of that dosh.

Kiwipixter
246 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  #598590 22-Mar-2012 11:25
Send private message

To me this looks like the right holders argument of loosing revenue because of file sharing is sounding very hollow.  Surely, their business case would stack up if paying the $25 enforcement fee would give them many $$$ in return of revenue loss due to file sharing?

Linuxluver
5833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1639

Trusted
Subscriber

  #598601 22-Mar-2012 11:42
Send private message

scuwp: Some more stellar reporting from Stuff, but might be open slather on infringement notices if the PC politics see their way through.  

Movie studios are about to push the Government to lower the fees they have to pay internet providers to out copyright pirates under the so-called "Skynet" law that took effect last year.

The Economic Development Ministry has kicked off a promised review of the $25 fee that rights holders must pay internet providers to send infringement notices to customers accused of piracy under the "three strikes regime".

Tony Eaton, head of the New Zealand branch of the Motion Picture Association, NZFact, said the issue was on his "to do" list next week and it would call for the fees to be lowered or done away with altogether.


...

 


This was obviously going to happen.  They passed the law they could pass.....and now begins the process of tipping the table ever more toward the people who far too frequently asserts rights over things they don't own at all. 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


Linuxluver
5833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1639

Trusted
Subscriber

  #598602 22-Mar-2012 11:43
Send private message

Kiwipixter: To me this looks like the right holders argument of loosing revenue because of file sharing is sounding very hollow.  Surely, their business case would stack up if paying the $25 enforcement fee would give them many $$$ in return of revenue loss due to file sharing?


Don't let the facts confuse you. They haven't. 




_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
dolsen
1483 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 319

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #598606 22-Mar-2012 11:54
Send private message

Time to look at us-cert Vulnerability Note VU#723755 and sit outside the ministers office for a while....
Perhaps not.


kyhwana2
2572 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 233


  #598615 22-Mar-2012 12:16
Send private message

Welp, looks like ISP costs will be going up, (and seedboxes staying the same).
Doesn't give much incentive to buy stuff legit huh? (If/when possible, which it usually isn't)


Batman
Mad Scientist
30012 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #598740 22-Mar-2012 17:07
Send private message

Not good...guess who will be paying for them...us

Athlonite
1828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 210
Inactive user


  #598819 22-Mar-2012 19:59
Send private message

If they do away with the current fee then perhaps ISP's could "do away" with delivering infringement notices or start charging an hourly rate

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.