Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


xpd

xpd

Geek @ Coastguard NZ
13765 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#316281 2-Oct-2024 09:19
Send private message

Been asked by someone who wants to do web development, to organize 2x 42" 4k TV screens for them. 

 

My immediate thoughts are.....

 

1) Why 2x screens of that size ?

 

2) Neck/eye issues from using them as monitors (they'd have them on a desk, so less than 1m away from them)

 

 

 

Anyone (apart from gamers) use this sort of setup for their daily work ? 

 

 





       Gavin / xpd / FastRaccoon / Geek of Coastguard New Zealand

 

                      LinkTree

 

 

 


Create new topic
reven
3743 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #3289904 2-Oct-2024 10:04
Send private message

developer here.  I have two machines with a a 49" 32:9 ultra wides each.  one is a 3840x1080 and one is a err 5120x1440 (something like that).  I prefer the 5120 one.  I use to have 3 24" monitors.  So could have code in the middle, app running on one and browser for into on another.   I switched to declutter the cables mostly.  

 

I would not want a 16:9 42" screen, let alone two of them.  but if theyre not 16:9 and are wider, then I could see how 2 would be useful.




lxsw20
3552 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #3289907 2-Oct-2024 10:06
Send private message

I've seen large 4k used in paired programming (XP) but for anything else I would have thought 32" 4K is about the useful limit. 


Lias
5589 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3289943 2-Oct-2024 10:55
Send private message

xpd:

 

Anyone (apart from gamers) use this sort of setup for their daily work ? 

 

 

I don't really see any issue with that for any sort of dev like tech job, there's no such thing as too much desktop real estate. I use a quad setup of dual 34's and dual 24's myself.





I'm a geek, a gamer, a dad, a Quic user, and an IT Professional. I have a full rack home lab, size 15 feet, an epic beard and Asperger's. I'm a bit of a Cypherpunk, who believes information wants to be free and the Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. If you use my Quic signup you can also use the code R570394EKGIZ8 for free setup.




nzkc
1572 posts

Uber Geek


  #3289987 2-Oct-2024 11:58
Send private message

I have 2 x 4K monitors I use for development. But they're only 27" (actually would prefer a 30") not 42"! That seems excessive to me. If I were setting things up again I'd probably do it differently. 1080p is too restrictive but 4K is a bit much. So something like 2 or 3 1440p panels would probably be better for me.  4K is crap for screen sharing if the others are on 1080p too.


SpartanVXL
1307 posts

Uber Geek


  #3289994 2-Oct-2024 12:24
Send private message

One is usually okay, two might be awkward if one is off to the side.

Put it this way, each of them are like four 21” 1080p monitors in a 2x2 grid. If you are using proper scaling this isn’t really as bad as it seems at a 1m distance with decent eyesight.

Of course you get issues screensharing but that is the on the recipient to zoom or ask for a source zoom.

Dynamic
3867 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3290009 2-Oct-2024 12:57
Send private message

My primary display at my office and my home office is a single 43", which as someone else mentions is approximately equivalent to 4x 21" Full HD screens.  I have tried four different TVs (Veon, LG, Panasonic, Sony) for extended periods of time which produced average results, though the Panasonic that I bought hours before lockdown in 2020 was the best and I still use that at home.  The Philips 438P1 that I settled on for my office desk a year ago is fantastic for my use (general office apps).

 

I can't imagine having two this size on my desk, though occasionally I think it would be nice to have a small screen off to the side for items that I want to be able to monitor easily (without having to hunt under various windows each time I want to see it).

 

Edit to add a note that the Philips 438P1 is a monitor and not a TV screen.





“Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose.” Douglas Adams

 

Referral links to services I use, really like, and may be rewarded if you sign up:
PocketSmith for budgeting and personal finance management.  A great Kiwi company.


coffeebaron
6233 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3290067 2-Oct-2024 13:30
Send private message

Have they asked yet for the desk chair that moves from side to side on rails :)

 

 





Rural IT and Broadband support.

 

Broadband troubleshooting and master filter installs.
Starlink installer - one month free: https://www.starlink.com/?referral=RC-32845-88860-71 
Wi-Fi and networking
Cel-Fi supply and installer - boost your mobile phone coverage legally

 

Need help in Auckland, Waikato or BoP? Click my email button, or email me direct: [my user name] at geekzonemail dot com


 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
Ragnor
8219 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #3290288 2-Oct-2024 22:11
Send private message

Another developer here, multiple screens are extremely benefit/common for programming and development, various studies show 30-50% productivity increase.

 

I still use 3x 24" 1080p monitors at work and 2x 27" 1440p monitors at home monitors. Recent hires have gone for 32" 4k ultra wides, I will likely upgrade from the old 3x 24" soon. You can do fencing of applications with one large screen in most OSes to simulate the benefit of multiple screens however it's not as good imo.

 

The request for 42" tv screens is a bit odd, generally tv screens are terrible for close working/text rendering and are meant for moving content at a couch distance. Though I suspect it's better than in the the past with modern tech.

 

The pixel density is important to consider, ie:

 

24" @ 1080p = ~92ppi

 

27" @ 1440p =~110ppi

 

32" @ 4k = ~138ppi

 

etc

 

Too large ppi you have to use a lot of font/ui scaling for things to not be too small, too low ppi crap image/text quality. Generally too high or low resolution for size is considered bad ie 24" @ 1440p instead of 1080p, 32" @ 1440p instea do 4k etc

 

With that said the the biggest issue with 42" is the distance you will be from the screen, if it's close it would be rough imo.

 

 

 

 


Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.