Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Aaroona

3204 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 169


#133398 21-Oct-2013 11:04
Send private message

Im looking for a KVM which can be placed inline with everything, to allow remote control from a remote location (IP based) but also still allow input from the machine itself without any extra configuration each time.

Is anyone aware of such a product? This is proving quite difficult! 

Create new topic
Zeon
3926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 759

Trusted

  #919062 21-Oct-2013 11:27
Send private message

Could you elaborate on what you mean by input from the machine itself? Also what is the application?

Most of the servers these days have IPMI, iLo etc. built in to the motherboard although I appreciate you may not be controlling a server!




Speedtest 2019-10-14




Aaroona

3204 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 169


  #919066 21-Oct-2013 11:32
Send private message

Zeon: Could you elaborate on what you mean by input from the machine itself? Also what is the application?

Most of the servers these days have IPMI, iLo etc. built in to the motherboard although I appreciate you may not be controlling a server!


To give you an idea, its a solution proposed for our PCI-DSS implementation.

So basically, these machines are not connected to our network at all to limit our domains PCI exposure. So to manage them currently, we would have to physically visit the machine, sit in front of it, and do whatever we needed.
I was hoping that we could use an IP KVM, to connect to a network and remotely administer the PC (as most of my team is actually based of our Australia). 

So while I need to remotely administer it, there will be people physically at the machine every now and then (business users/no technical knowledge) who will need to use it.

Hopefully that makes a little more sense.... For this application we are using Lenovo M92p's (Tiny), so physical cards for the computers are gonna' be a no-go.

Lias
5655 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3978

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #919384 21-Oct-2013 20:24
Send private message

http://www.raritan.com/products/kvm-over-ip/kx-ii-101/

at-the-rack access via a local port and up to 8 remote IP users




I'm a geek, a gamer, a dad, a Quic user, and an IT Professional. I have a full rack home lab, size 15 feet, an epic beard and Asperger's. I'm a bit of a Cypherpunk, who believes information wants to be free and the Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. If you use my Quic signup you can also use the code R570394EKGIZ8 for free setup. Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.




Aaroona

3204 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 169


  #919389 21-Oct-2013 20:36
Send private message

Lias: http://www.raritan.com/products/kvm-over-ip/kx-ii-101/

at-the-rack access via a local port and up to 8 remote IP users


Yeah I did see that one, but what does "At the rack access" actually mean? My understanding was that it was only accessable "at-the-rack" via the serial port, which won't be of any use really for us... am I reading that right?

Aaroona

3204 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 169


  #919392 21-Oct-2013 20:40
Send private message

Just having a think about this...


I wonder if I put in an IP KVM, then get a VGA splitter, split the signal in two, one going to the KVM and one going to the screen locally, then plug in the USB's as per normal, and the USB from the KVM as well.


Surely that would work? Seems overly complicated though, surely others have needed a solution like this...

michaelmurfy
meow
13579 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10910

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #919394 21-Oct-2013 20:48
Send private message

Hmm I feel this is overcomplicating things a bit for what you're actually needing. Why not just have a local network without internet access, disable file sharing over that network, set all IP's statically and just have VNC servers on each and remotely connect to them via a jumphost?




Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)

Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
Aaroona

3204 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 169


  #919396 21-Oct-2013 20:52
Send private message

michaelmurfy: Hmm I feel this is overcomplicating things a bit for what you're actually needing. Why not just have a local network without internet access, disable file sharing over that network, set all IP's statically and just have VNC servers on each and remotely connect to them via a jumphost?


Problem is, both of the PC's require internet access.  (trust me, don't ask... I've argued with the team over this numerous times). We could easily achieve the same result by using other methods, but they're "not approved" apparently. 

I'll try have a chat with the project manager for PCI about this... I'll also contact raritan and see if this product fits the bill.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.