Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Lizard1977

2133 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 624

ID Verified

#315110 14-Jun-2024 13:11
Send private message

It's been a long time since I built my PC - barring a couple of upgrades, it's pretty much as I built it back in 2009, which is pretty good going IMO.  But I believe that Win10 support runs out next year, and my current PC won't support Win11.  While I know there are workarounds (and Windows alternatives), I'm giving thought to a new build.  I mentioned this to a friend who is in a very similar position, and they asked me for my advice about a new build that will be able to handle the very large photo files they routinely work with.  I said I would look into it - as it's been a while since I paid much attention to hardware, I'm not really sure how much of an issue this is, but I recall reading years ago about setups that were configured especially for people dealing with large Photoshop files.  I think that was more to do with the then-emerging technology of SSDs, different levels of cache, etc.  I haven't kept current with hardware, so this may not even be an issue anymore.

 

So, there are a couple of questions I want to ask:

 

1.For me, I'm not really playing games anymore (have kids, a busy life, don't have the time really), so a high-end graphics card isn't the natural first consideration it might once have been.  Though the hardware geek inside me still lusts after the bragging rights of a powerful graphics card.  I take very high-res gaming out of the equation (for me, 1440p+ is very high res.  I'm just as likely to play games from my glory years, which look fine at 1920x1080...), what kind of specs should I be aiming for?  A nice desktop build still appeals, but I also accept that a well specced NUC might also meet 90% of my needs (while leaving me slightly dead inside at not having a beautiful piece of hardware to marvel at).

 

 

 

2. For my friend, what kind of specs should they be looking at for desktop that won't be strained by dealing with very large photo and scan files?  They are the family archivist (and draw on some of their professional knowledge working in heritage preservation) and so often create very large resolution scans of documents and photos for archiving.  I think they want a setup that won't be struggling to handle the large data transfers.  Keep in mind that we're both still stuck in the SATA3 era with SSDs and some mechanical drives.  I know there are newer technologies and standards, but I'm not really sure what's what, so it would be good to get some suggestions of what to explore (e.g. m.2, NVME - not sure what they are, or what the difference is...)


Create new topic
Jase2985
13730 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6202

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #3248817 14-Jun-2024 14:07
Send private message

     

  1. something like this would be fine would play most games at 1440p at mid to high frame rates but can always drop to 1080p for first person shooters if you need higer framerates
    https://www.computerlounge.co.nz/pcsystems/shop/systems/gaming/core/amd/core-amd-stage-1/edit-configuration/b8c5a0dd-9116-4c19-b16d-b18f00e7ac7c
  2. Similar specs to the one above you for you, check what software they use as it could benefit from a more powerful GPU and more RAM.
    throw in a NVME PCI-E 4 or greater SSD of 1TB for the OS and programs and then another one of 2-4TB storages of in use files, then put in a spinning HDD for long term storage, these go up to about 24TB at the moment. if you need more storage then that you should be looking at a NAS or DAS.

 

 

 

At the end of the day it really comes down to budget, without knowing that we are just guessing 

 

 




timmmay
20857 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5349

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3248974 14-Jun-2024 15:03
Send private message

Can you define "very large"? 50MB? 10GB? Gigapixel? Anything coming out of a scanner or modern camera isn't really that large usually. Any modern computer should be fine with any image file size, though some will process things a bit faster. 

 

Modern drives are m.2 drives, they look like chips on a small finger sized circuit board. They're very fast, 2GBps is easy probably much higher. They get VERY hot 80C easy and though they're designed for it cooling is important. A basic heatsink is the minimum, I prefer to use something like this. The fan is so small and loud it's a waste of time, but the passive version would be great. I position it near my GPU fan, that keeps it cool enough. Next motherboard a key consideration for me is min 2xm.2 slot and positioned well so they can take a decent sized heatsink and in an area with good airflow. I wouldn't want two m.2 drives stacked like some boards do.


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.