Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
cyril7
9058 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2846050 10-Jan-2022 12:26
Send private message

theUtmost:

 

I

 

That said, we have now moved into a much newer house: built in 2003/2004.

 

It has zero network wiring in it. It has a concrete pad floor (so I can't go under it). It has an architecturally "fun" single span single pitch roof - with no cavity (so I can't go over it). It also has internal brick wall through the hallway (so I can't really go through it!). Wall lining removal would be my only option and she-who-must-be-obeyed says nope.

 

 

 

 

I have dealt with a couple of these types of buildings, a method often overlooked is to shallow trench conduit around the peremiter of the building (in gardens etc) and drop circuits off as required using outdoor rated cable, obviously conduit T to rise up a vertical conduit and a wall box to enter the building as an where required..

 

Cyril




Chrisblobster

24 posts

Geek


  #2846086 10-Jan-2022 13:19
Send private message

theUtmost:

 

That said, we have now moved into a much newer house: built in 2003/2004.

 

It has zero network wiring in it. It has a concrete pad floor (so I can't go under it). It has an architecturally "fun" single span single pitch roof - with no cavity (so I can't go over it). It also has internal brick wall through the hallway (so I can't really go through it!). Wall lining removal would be my only option and she-who-must-be-obeyed says nope.

 

I have tried mesh wifi gear - what a load of rubbish they are! (disclaimer: I design enterprise WiFi stuff so perhaps my expectations are too high?)

 

Even though I thought my TL-PA9020P kit had died, I never got round to disposing of it, so in desperation, I got it out and tried it. Working fine! So presumably cabling done from 2003 onwards is more amenable to the right variety of modulation/demodulation required for powerline. I'll probably jinx it by typing this but it hasn't actually gone offline once yet. Don't think there is any point in sharing speedtest / throughput results because my circumstance and mains wiring isn't the same as yours so it's not relevant.

 

 

I'm renting a 1995 built brick/tile house on concrete slab with 2 bedrooms and internal access garage, well built, and I would posit to say wired well (apart from some GPO's installed with horizontal in-wall runs to be placed under windows) as my AV500 EoP adaptors have been very very reliable here - only a handful of dropouts in 18+ months I've been here easily solved by power cycling the individual EoP's. I get a rocksteady 90 Mbps across my EoP network, which is a lot faster than the 11bgn mixed 300 Mbps wifi my current router provides. Nothing seems to affect the throughput, even the microwave or FF or Hot Water heater can be running and I still get 90 Mbps.

 

 

Anyway, while it doesn't directly answer your query about AV500 > AV2000 upgrade, hope some of my experience might be useful. I don't think you can read anything into other people's results even if they did use exactly the same powerline hardware as you have (and are considering upgrading to) because the major variables are the mains wiring itself and also the mix of other appliances running on said mains wiring (causes interference for the signal propagation and modulation/demodulation) - which will always differ to yours!.

 

 

It helps, your experiences are useful information and it seems that relatively modern wiring (such as is installed here or in your new digs) will certainly help. My prior rental was a 1975 built property with 100/20 fibre, and my EoP throughput was a bit slower at around 75-80 Mbps (which I didn't worry about as it was close enough to the fibre speed). I've looked at the cost of mesh wifi and other suggestions posted by others, and believe it or not dropping some $$ on a couple of AV2000 EoP's is actually going to be the cheapest solution that doesn't involve running Cat6 across the floor. I'll go ahead and grab a pair of AV2000's if anyone has any left... ðŸĪŠðŸ˜‘

 

Cheers, Chris, Christchurch.


  #2846092 10-Jan-2022 13:44
Send private message

I've got 4 spare Netgear AV2000 units. PM if you want them.




Megabyte - so geek it megahertz



theUtmost
50 posts

Geek


  #2846100 10-Jan-2022 14:04
Send private message

Chrisblobster:

 

I've looked at the cost of mesh wifi and other suggestions posted by others, and believe it or not dropping some $$ on a couple of AV2000 EoP's is actually going to be the cheapest solution that doesn't involve running Cat6 across the floor. I'll go ahead and grab a pair of AV2000's if anyone has any left... ðŸĪŠðŸ˜‘

 

 

I totally believe it. If you can't do the cabling yourself and/or don't have access to hardware at trade rates, then even cabling costs quickly mount.

 

Plus - the EoP units are portable so you get to take with, if you move / switch rentals etc.

 

For ref, found these MoCA 2.5 which are at least a brand I have heard of 😂

 

https://www.amazon.com/Motorola-Adapter-Ethernet-Network-Streaming/dp/B08XWWZTLP/currency=NZD&currencyCode=NZD 

 

I figure that Motorola have a proven track record with mo/dem coax signals.  Close to all of the docsis cable modems in NZ used by TCL/VF HFC were Moto units...


ALTRON
577 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #2846244 10-Jan-2022 16:09
Send private message

Ive been using a pair of D-link DHP-700AV in my really old house for over three years now and they work mint.

 

I get the full bandwidth of my current 300Mb fibre connection. They're really reliable as I think they've only dropped connection twice in the years Ive had them.

 

But again, its like the others say that its really up to the internal wiring in your home which will dictate how well they perform.


Chrisblobster

24 posts

Geek


  #2850259 13-Jan-2022 17:17
Send private message

Thanks to all who replied, and thanks to 1024kb who I bought 4 of the Netgear PLP2000 units from - they're happily installed now and allowing me to max out my 300 Mbps fibre, and do 350+ Mbps transfers between EoP's across my network - so it does seem in my case that if you can get 90 Mbps on AV500 powerline adaptors that moving up to AV2000 will give approx a 4X throughput increase. 👍


linw
2849 posts

Uber Geek


  #2850901 14-Jan-2022 16:02
Send private message

Good result.


1 | 2 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.