Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


16 posts

Geek


Topic # 115068 12-Mar-2013 17:12
Send private message

Hi everyone

We have a server with on-board 10GbE SFP ethernet but a switch with only 1GbE SFP ports and we're unable to get traffic over the link. Using Linux ethtool I can set the server to run the interface at 1Gb (ethtool -s eth0 speed 1000) but without luck. We're using a SFP+ cable which I believe is backward compatible with SFP.

The server is a HP DL380p Gen8 with NetXtreme II 10GbE controllers.
The switch is a Cisco 3560.

Neither supplier has been much help.

Hopefully someone out there works with this stuff every day and knows right off what we're doing wrong. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks
  Shane

P.S. What's the point of (expensive) SFP ports that only run at 1GbE anyway?


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic
341 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 26

Trusted

  Reply # 778699 12-Mar-2013 17:20
Send private message

As a general rule, SFP and SFP+ are not compatible. You'll also generally find that you can't have 10 GbE at one end and 1 GbE at the other, even if you're rate limiting the port speed, as the wavelengths will differ.

In general, when dealing with fibre, everything must be exactly the same. It's not remotely plug-n-play.

The purpose of using fibre for 1 GbE comes down to distance. If you're not going over 70m or so, you'll have a much easier time just using Cat6.



16 posts

Geek


  Reply # 778720 12-Mar-2013 17:57
Send private message

The cable is copper, but it sounds like your answer will still apply since SFP seems incapable of negotiation. So if 10GbE running at 1GbE is really just throttled 10GbE when we're out of luck, until we upgrade the switch. Right?


6299 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 288

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 778742 12-Mar-2013 18:51
Send private message

Hi, depending on brand you can put SFP in SFP+ ports, but not the otherway around.

Cyril

2355 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 374

Trusted

  Reply # 778764 12-Mar-2013 19:39
One person supports this post
Send private message

So do you have Copper 10G (Just standard Cat6 Cables) or do you have SPF+ Ports with Fibre SPF+ Adapters?

I don't think Copper will Autoneg to 1G (depends on the Adapters) and with Fibre SPF it will need SPF+ 10G SPF+'s on both ends

6299 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 288

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 778767 12-Mar-2013 19:42
Send private message

or are they SFP twinax cables?

Cyril



16 posts

Geek


  Reply # 778793 12-Mar-2013 20:50
Send private message

cyril7: bugga, I was sure I read somewhere that SFP+ cables were backwards compatible with SFP. It's HP brand. No idea, never heard of twinax.

LennonNZ: The cable itself may be cat6 but it states that it is copper and that it is SFP+. ethtool reports that autoneg is not supported, which is why I was setting the DL380 to 1GB speed.

1GbE RJ45 is just so simple :)

2355 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 374

Trusted

  Reply # 778809 12-Mar-2013 21:24
Send private message

Ah.. sounds like a TwinAx Cable. (10GSFP+Cu) Copper Cable with Directly Attached SPF+'s at each end.

Like this?? http://www.amazon.com/Diablo-Cable-24AWG-Copper-Twinax/dp/B005WX2FSU

You'll need a switch which has SPF+ Slots. Cheap? Nope..

I don't even think your 3560 would have 10G of backplane anyway...

You should be able to find a switch with 2 to 4 10G SPF+ Slots and 24 GigE Copper quiet easily..





16 posts

Geek


  Reply # 781030 13-Mar-2013 11:48
Send private message

OK, thanks guys. It looks like we wasted a bit of money. We can just keep using the 1GbE (RJ45) PCIe card and switch to the 10GbE SFP when we replace the Cisco, which I expect is a long way off.

Real shame since the 8 disk raid6 array can push 650MB/s. There's always bonding as a stepping stone.

1984 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 133

Trusted

  Reply # 783046 17-Mar-2013 18:10
Send private message

SFP+ active cables are not backward compatible as far as I know. 10GbaseT (ie Cat6A cable) is backward compatible with 1000baseT (ie cat6 cable), but 10GbaseSX and 10GbaseLX are only compatible with themselves. You could get SFP and SFP+ modules that have RJ45 sockets for standard gigabit ethernet (baseT), or just get a matching module for the SFP+ side. So for example if your SFP is 1000baseSX then you also need that for the SFP+ module.




Qualified in business, certified in fibre, stuck in copper, have to keep going  ^_^

Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.