Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


MichaelNZ

1385 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions

#236175 21-May-2018 21:08
Send private message

Simply enabling the IPV6 package (disabled by default) causes the router to not be able to connect to the internet. PPPoE connect attempts fail with no useful information in the log.

 

Has someone else seen this weird issue before?





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
RunningMan
8954 posts

Uber Geek


  #2020081 21-May-2018 21:13
Send private message

Not seen that, however, /system logging (and assuming winbox/webfig) add a new log type with no topics selected, and action memory. That should enable more info in the log to troubleshoot. Delete or disable that rule though when finished or it will overrun the log very quickly.




MichaelNZ

1385 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions

  #2020090 21-May-2018 21:40
Send private message

For equally unknown reasons it has now decided to work as far as connecting. But I still don't have working IPV6.

 

The 'howtos' I have found so far indicate the way to do this with Mikrotik is to run a DHCPv6 client on the WAN interface. This does not appear to be working either showing status of "searching". Additionally, none of the advice topology I have found refloects how things are done here, leaving me to fill in the blanks.

 

Should this client run on vlan 10 or the pppoe interface?

 

Is the advice wrong and there is another way?

 

What I have done so far:

 

ipv6 / dhcpv6-client

 

interface = dialer0 (pppoe interface)

 

request = prefix

 

pool name = ipv6-pool

 

add default route = yes





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers


MattR
224 posts

Master Geek


  #2020488 22-May-2018 16:17
Send private message

I've had no trouble running IPv6 on PPPoE on VLAN 10.

 

 

 

The DHCP Client should be listening on the interface where you get your IPv4 public IP - so if you're using PPPoE, it should be on the PPPoE interface.

 

 

 

I've never had the IPv6 module break IPv4. If you have a default-deny policy on your ipv6 firewall (as you should..) you'll need to allow DHCPv6

 

 

 

Which ISP are you with?




MichaelNZ

1385 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions

  #2020489 22-May-2018 16:19
Send private message

MattR:

 

The DHCP Client should be listening on the interface where you get your IPv4 public IP - so if you're using PPPoE, it should be on the PPPoE interface.

 

 

 

I've never had the IPv6 module break IPv4. If you have a default-deny policy on your ipv6 firewall (as you should..) you'll need to allow DHCPv6

 

 

 

Which ISP are you with?

 

 

So my config should be "correct" then... I am with InspireNet.

 

The IPV6 module thing was weird. It appeared to break it but next time it worked... No explanation.





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers


MattR
224 posts

Master Geek


  #2020494 22-May-2018 16:58
Send private message

I'm on 2degrees, so I'm just guessing here.

 

 

 

In the DHCPv6 Client config, which requests do you have? Try "prefix" only - not info or address.

 

 

 

Edit: I see you've already got that..


MichaelNZ

1385 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions

  #2020495 22-May-2018 16:59
Send private message

MattR:

 

In the DHCPv6 Client config, which requests do you have? Try "prefix" only - not info or address.

 

 

That's what I have, thanks.

 

As follows:

 

ipv6 / dhcpv6-client

 

interface = dialer0 (pppoe interface)

 

request = prefix

 

pool name = ipv6-pool

 

add default route = yes





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers


MattR
224 posts

Master Geek


  #2020516 22-May-2018 17:33
Send private message

Inspire's IPv6 page says you need to email them to get it enabled, I assume you've done that?

 

 

 

Are you firewalling icmp6 and/or udp/546?

 

 

 

Can't think of any other reason why it wouldn't work.

 

 


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
MichaelNZ

1385 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions

  #2020522 22-May-2018 17:42
Send private message

MattR:

 

Inspire's IPv6 page says you need to email them to get it enabled, I assume you've done that?

 

Are you firewalling icmp6 and/or udp/546?

 

 

I was alocated a /56 at the time of setting up the account.

 

I don't see anything mentioned under IP / Firewall or IPV6 / Firewall.

 

But it doesn't say what the default is and I am not yet familiar enough with Mikrotik.

 

Is this something which needs to be explicitly set?





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers


MattR
224 posts

Master Geek


  #2020535 22-May-2018 18:10
Send private message

default is allow, so you'll want to configure some rules. Leaving it open to the world is a very bad idea. Do IPv4 right now - there are multiple exploits that target the management interface of the Mikrotik unless it's a very recent OS version.


MichaelNZ

1385 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions

  #2020578 22-May-2018 18:59
Send private message

MattR:

 

default is allow, so you'll want to configure some rules. Leaving it open to the world is a very bad idea. Do IPv4 right now - there are multiple exploits that target the management interface of the Mikrotik unless it's a very recent OS version.

 

 

I have already restricted access to the management interface and it's the latest O/S. But good advice thanks.





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers


raytaylor
4014 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2020742 22-May-2018 21:25
Send private message

If you ask mikrotik support "It will be fixed in ROS 7"





Ray Taylor

There is no place like localhost

Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here


MichaelNZ

1385 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions

  #2021121 23-May-2018 13:05
Send private message

Inspire have fixed the issue (configuration problem at their end) and I now have IPV6 (yay!), however, all my DMZ IPV4 traffic is now showing at the remote end as originating from the WAN IP address and not the host's statically assigned publicly-routable IPV4 address.

 

I have covered the obvious bases - checked the host has it's correct IPV4 address configured. Check.

 

Plugged my Cisco back in and the problem is fixed so it's definately at my end.

 

It appears what is happening is the Mikrotik is NATing IPV4 even though it doesn't need to NAT hosts in the DMZ vlan.

 

Whether this is a consequence of enabling IPV6 or something I have just noticed, I don't know. I have only had the Mikrotik for about a week. I disabled IPV6 by stopping the DHCPv6 client and the issue persisisted.

 

Can anyone here shed some light on what is happening please? I will continue to Google for a resolution.

 

In Cisco terminology, I assume what's needed is to specify an internal interface for "nat inside".





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers


Spyware
3761 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2021141 23-May-2018 13:23
Send private message

You need to look at any masquerade/srcnat rules and apply to a specific source address only (rather than all).


MichaelNZ

1385 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Integrity Tech Solutions

  #2021147 23-May-2018 13:38
Send private message

Spyware:

 

You need to look at any masquerade/srcnat rules and apply to a specific source address only (rather than all).

 

 

Thanks for that. All fixed now.

 

I have learned a new some new Mikrotik stuff today. :-)





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers


cyril7
9058 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2021153 23-May-2018 13:56
Send private message

You should put a srcnat accept rule before the srcnat masqerade rule that filters the specific addresses in the firewall nat

 

Cyril


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.