Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Dionysus

7 posts

Wannabe Geek
Inactive user


#239435 17-Jul-2018 16:39
Send private message

Having a strange issue here, not sure if there are any networking people hanging about but it has stumped me. I've got a brand new Cat7 cable which is hooked up to our Orcon NF4v adsl line. When taking a speedtest, same server, same cable I am getting different pings on two different machines. This is not the issue, I realise that many factors can come into play, the issue is that my vastly superior desktop machine with a gigabit port is getting consistent pings of 27 while my ancient NEC laptop is getting consistent pings of 16. My desktop was built in the last couple of years, Gigabyte Sniper B7 MB with an Intel Gigabit port. The max speeds of the port on the laptop is 100mb/s. The laptop is running Windows 7 SP1 and the desktop is running Arch with the 414 kernel, I've already tried installing windows on the desktop, but that gives me the same results. I have also tried a different cable, same results, static IP, same results, changing the duplex values, changing DNS servers, disabling NAT on the Ethernet line, reinstalling the most recent drivers while running Windows 10 on my desktop (drivers that were released 10 years after the final update of the laptop's drivers) which surprisingly all producing the same results. Both using the chrome as the browser although I have tried using Firefox which also produces the same results.

 

I'm looking at some trace routes from the router, however I can't seem to understand what they are telling me, perhaps someone can point me in the right direction. Anyone know any other tools I can use to debug the issue and see where these extra 14 or so ms of ping are bizarrely coming from? The download speeds are also slightly different with the laptop again winning out, however I couldn't tell you exactly by how much.

 

Please don't bother commenting if you are just going to say "I wouldn't worry about it, it's not going to make a difference anyway..." I am looking to debug the issue, not to ignore it.


Create new topic
wellygary
8312 posts

Uber Geek


  #2057893 17-Jul-2018 16:44
Send private message

Try using "ping" on the command line and start working your way through the upstream connection points....

 

 




Dionysus

7 posts

Wannabe Geek
Inactive user


  #2057924 17-Jul-2018 16:47
Send private message

wellygary:

 

Try using "ping" on the command line and start working your way through the upstream connection points....

 

 

 

 

I assume you mean in windows? Since Arch gives me this.

 

64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.437 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.609 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.507 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.533 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.490 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.483 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.536 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.690 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.424 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.492 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.509 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.593 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.399 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.514 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=0.541 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=0.436 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=0.374 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=0.436 ms


gehenna
8495 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2057926 17-Jul-2018 16:50
Send private message

Older computers are often faster at basic tasks since they don't have the same overhead of complicated hardware and firmware that modern devices do.




sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #2057931 17-Jul-2018 16:54
Send private message

What are the pings to the router from both machines?

 

The cable will make no difference since cat7 offers no advantages over cat5 for Ethernet in your scenario.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Dionysus

7 posts

Wannabe Geek
Inactive user


  #2057932 17-Jul-2018 17:01
Send private message

sbiddle:

 

What are the pings to the router from both machines?

 

The cable will make no difference since cat7 offers no advantages over cat5 for Ethernet in your scenario.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Those are the pings,

 

https://pastebin.com/TAs5UBp7

 

I actually reckon it does give an advantage, Cat7 cables indeed provide better shielding and more consistent speeds when the cable is over a couple of metres. She's a 15m cable I've got running at the moment. It won't have a massive difference I agree but a couple of mb/s, couple of ms, could do. 


Dionysus

7 posts

Wannabe Geek
Inactive user


  #2057933 17-Jul-2018 17:02
Send private message

sbiddle:

 

What are the pings to the router from both machines?

 

The cable will make no difference since cat7 offers no advantages over cat5 for Ethernet in your scenario.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You reckon that's it? I thought it could be too but really.. with that port it's embarrassing. 


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #2058010 17-Jul-2018 20:48
Send private message

Dionysus:

 

sbiddle:

 

What are the pings to the router from both machines?

 

The cable will make no difference since cat7 offers no advantages over cat5 for Ethernet in your scenario.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Those are the pings,

 

https://pastebin.com/TAs5UBp7

 

I actually reckon it does give an advantage, Cat7 cables indeed provide better shielding and more consistent speeds when the cable is over a couple of metres. She's a 15m cable I've got running at the moment. It won't have a massive difference I agree but a couple of mb/s, couple of ms, could do. 

 

 

Pretty hard to tell anything from that and diagnosing such a fault would require a lot more testing.

 

Cat7 cable certainly won't offer any advantage or difference over that distance using FE or Gigabit Ethernet, and unless the laws of physics have changed certainly can't change latency vs a 50c cat5e cable.

 

 


 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
Dionysus

7 posts

Wannabe Geek
Inactive user


  #2058011 17-Jul-2018 20:51
Send private message

Fair call although regardless the cable certainly isn't the issue.

Any ideas about something I could do?

hio77
12999 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lizard Networks

  #2058044 17-Jul-2018 22:25
Send private message

Sounds to me like between tests you actually ended up on another server or alternative route to the server.

 

 

 

Your latency to the router doesn't seem any different so internal is sweet.

 

Try double checking your testing against the same server

 

 





#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.

 

 


Dionysus

7 posts

Wannabe Geek
Inactive user


  #2058051 17-Jul-2018 22:52
Send private message

hio77:

 

Sounds to me like between tests you actually ended up on another server or alternative route to the server.

 

 

 

Your latency to the router doesn't seem any different so internal is sweet.

 

Try double checking your testing against the same server

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, that could have been the issue, although I have done the test upwards of 30 times with the exact same results, there isn't an issue with speed test directing servers to different oses?


Aredwood
3885 posts

Uber Geek


  #2058073 18-Jul-2018 02:58

Have you tried testing using the Windows inbuilt ping command or another application apart from speed test. Do still get different ping for each computer? Does the router have its own inbuilt ping function?

Are you using the same version of the speed test website? As there is the older flash based version, and an HTML5 version.





sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #2058080 18-Jul-2018 07:25
Send private message

Dionysus:

 

hio77:

 

Sounds to me like between tests you actually ended up on another server or alternative route to the server.

 

 

 

Your latency to the router doesn't seem any different so internal is sweet.

 

Try double checking your testing against the same server

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, that could have been the issue, although I have done the test upwards of 30 times with the exact same results, there isn't an issue with speed test directing servers to different oses?

 

 

You never said you were using speedtest.net for your testing. Therein lies your problem.

 

Ping is your friend and the only tool you should be using for testing. Latency using speedtest.net from a browser can of course deliver differing results on different browsers and PCs.

 

 


Dionysus

7 posts

Wannabe Geek
Inactive user


  #2058394 18-Jul-2018 16:22
Send private message

Aha, why is that? I don't see how they should give a difference in ping of upwards of 10ms. Such a site should surely have prevention measures in place for such a situation.


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #2058398 18-Jul-2018 16:43
Send private message

I suggest you read up how speedtest.net works especially when you're using it from a browser that requires HTML5 or flash to work. 10ms is such a small time that different browsers and different PCs can and do deliver different results.

 

If you want to test latency you should be using ping. It's what it was built for.

 

 


Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.