![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
freitasm: "Best build your own" is not always an option for everyone.
I wish people would recognise this.
Security isn't something for free, Amazon or Google (either own knowledge or a job for professionals) - I wish people would recognise this.
- NET: FTTH, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs, ipPBX
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT: thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D: two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
freitasm: Not everyone can read a tutorial and decide it is safe, secure or even works for their plans. Some people just want something that works and that's what people are talking here.
Fully agree. But they should at least KNOW about the downsides. They should know about the RING safety breach desaster despite their nice, cheap design, low prices or whatever. And you know for sure, it's not dedicated to ring devices alone. Marketing never deals with the downsides of the relevant 'convenient' product.
- NET: FTTH, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs, ipPBX
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT: thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D: two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter
It's much like the usual folk that come into every one of these threads, and recommend Dahua and leave it at that
How about expand on that, which Dahua cams, which NVR, what are the caveats e.g. most if not all dahua cams are wired only correct? Not everyone has the luxury of hard wiring PoE cams over the place
SirHumphreyAppleby:
kiwijunglist:
I have amcrest (indoor 2MP PTZ) and Dahua outdoor starlight turrets.
Dahua make much better cameras than ring, but obviously you miss out on the Ring eco system and subscription based services.
+1 for Dahua. Three convictions with the help of my cameras in less than three years.
I have a bunch of Dahuas, (Admitally they are Chinese ones with hacked firmware) but I have nothing but issues with their motion detection. Its either far too sensitive or not sensitive enough.
Some of the newer cloud offerings go a bit deeper with their motion detection which works well. I will be considering changing once finance allows.
Thanks for all the replies, I really appreciate you taking the time to help. I do not feel confident enough to build my own system (and quite frankly don't have the time to watch the tutorials and understand it all), but appreciate that there are many downsides to cloud-based storage. I therefore really thank those who take the time to help inform me, as otherwise I can only go on what marketers say, and I would prefer to understand what I'm really buying to make the best, most informed choices. I do basically want a plug and play system as much as possible, and don't mind paying a subscription fee.
Another option is to phone a security installer and discuss your requirements with them.
I did this with one of our rentals, it was going to be $1000 worth of equipment + time for me to do it or $1500 for supply & professional install.. I chose the professional install and wouldn't hesitate to do it that way again.
dt:
Another option is to phone a security installer and discuss your requirements with them.
I did this with one of our rentals, it was going to be $1000 worth of equipment + time for me to do it or $1500 for supply & professional install.. I chose the professional install and wouldn't hesitate to do it that way again.
Just have in mind the moment a "security specialist" suggest port forwarding to a camera so you can watch the stream, run from that business.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
Yi cameras have a very good app and cloud recording of motion triggered incidents - but wifi only. Pretty cheap too.
What would folk recommend in the way of PoE cameras, with app and cloud recording?
BTW, if you think you have it finally done, there is another "slight" issue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fywvB4Unjv4
- NET: FTTH, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs, ipPBX
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT: thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D: two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter
Sounddude:
I have a bunch of Dahuas, (Admitally they are Chinese ones with hacked firmware) but I have nothing but issues with their motion detection. Its either far too sensitive or not sensitive enough.
Some of the newer cloud offerings go a bit deeper with their motion detection which works well. I will be considering changing once finance allows.
Sorry, I've only just seen this reply.
I also have Chinese hacked firmware versions. I don't use the built-in motion detection, I use the Blue Iris motion detection. While this picks up most things of interest, I don't rely on it. It's really just something that helps me pinpoint when things occur. I record 24/7 to a NAS.
All my dahua are english firmware versions, However I don't think the hacked firmware ones is an issue as long as you leave them closed off from the internet.
HTPC / Home automation (home assistant) enthusiast.
kiwijunglist:
All my dahua are english firmware versions, However I don't think the hacked firmware ones is an issue as long as you leave them closed off from the internet.
It's mostly paranoia I think. My cameras are not capable of communicating with the Internet, nor have I detected any attempts for them to do so.
SirHumphreyAppleby:
It's mostly paranoia I think. My cameras are not capable of communicating with the Internet, nor have I detected any attempts for them to do so.
It's NOT hackers are interested to spy on you, it's mainly to get in control about the CPU ressource to prepare massive DDoS attacks. You will not notice much before the attack starts. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8q8dab/15-million-connected-cameras-ddos-botnet-brian-krebs
- NET: FTTH, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs, ipPBX
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT: thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D: two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter
Tinkerisk:
It's NOT hackers are interested to spy on you, it's mainly to get in control about the CPU ressource to prepare massive DDoS attacks. You will not notice much before the attack starts. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8q8dab/15-million-connected-cameras-ddos-botnet-brian-krebs
I didn't say anything about spying on users. I'm simply stating that the constant warnings posted regarding these products are largely paranoia. It's fine for them to be able to connect to the Internet (time servers in particular). Don't port forward and block everything inbound by default on IPv6, and you're not likely to have issues. The same advice applies to every other device on your network.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |