![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
alasta: The tracks that I've ripped from CDs are compressed at 192kbps. Does this mean that they will all be replaced with 320kbps tracks immediately when I sign up, or does it just give me theopportunity to do that if I so choose?
Im just trying to gauge what immediate impact it's going to have on my broadband cap and hard drive space.
geekiegeek:alasta: The tracks that I've ripped from CDs are compressed at 192kbps. Does this mean that they will all be replaced with 320kbps tracks immediately when I sign up, or does it just give me theopportunity to do that if I so choose?
Im just trying to gauge what immediate impact it's going to have on my broadband cap and hard drive space.
256Kbps AAC
porche20002: iTunes won't replace the music in your computer's library; when you play on your iPhone it will then grab the 256kbps AAC version.
If you want to replace the music on your iTunes with the higher version, you'll need to create a smart playlist. This link might help. This is because you might have Apple Lossless on your computer or lower bit rates to save space.
alasta:
I assume you mean "when you download on your iPhone"? I would have thought that playing an existing low bitrate song would leave it intact?
alasta: That way I can avoid blowing my broadband cap.
this is a slap in the face!
this is a slap in the face!
alasta: Just to clarify, are the 256kbps audio files provided by iTunes Match free of any DRM or validity periods? If so then I guess there's nothing to stop you from paying the annual $40 fee once to legitimise your music collection, then cancel the service after a year and retain the high quality files.
porche20002: Yes, the files are DRM free so you could use the service to upgrade your DRM'd ones to DRM free, but if you get info on the matched track, it will say 'Matched AAC File' and also Purchased by and the account name. You could always re-encode them to get rid of it though.
In fact, a lot of people are going to pay for the first year to legitimise and upgrade quality. They call it a 'Pirate Tax' (ha)
alasta:
So does that actually impose any restrictions on the use of the file, or is it just a label?
I probably won't do it myself because for the sake of $40 a year the centralisation of my music collection seems useful enough, but I'm not surprised that a lot of people would do it. It's interesting that the record companies have actually allowed this - they seem to have softened up a lot in the last few years.
porche20002: Nope, it's just a label. There aren't any restrictions as such, but if you were to upload this for torrenting (is that a word?), people would know where the track came from as well as record labels.
Though I think Apple have a lot of power/force in getting the record companies to change their policies since they have I think 70% of online music sales?
iTunes match can turn my 16GB iPhone into a 30GB music collection, so I'm pretty happy with that too.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |