![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
SteveON:
You are kidding right?
Firstly, the bandwidth of a cellphone network is limited and secondly QOS is of the up most importance.
New Zealand has a lack of population and the investment required to service our networks is significantly higher than you would believe.
XT is a fantastic network, the back hull is amazing but there are limits to the technology. You will find in time that speeds and range may decrease over time.
Fixed line networks have far higher capacity than cell networks... and you believe they could provide fixed line rates??
Lets give an example of population density per Km sq
New Zealand - 15.953
UK - 254.676
I have used this example because many people like to use the UK rates as an example, both countries have a similar size land. Now, because of our hilly landscape for the same population; NZ requires a significantly higher investment per person.
Now just think about the economies of scale required to provide these plans.
I do not know all the ins and outs of what costs are but NZ has a SMALL population and is costs MORE per person to service the area. Therefore it is hard to justify putting in such a network that can sustain these kinds of speeds. XT is close, but really if you want data on the go, wait till 4G hits town in 2014ish
walt12: The only issue preventing me coming back to 2degrees now is data roaming. I assume that roaming is as it was before - ie outside of AKL/WLG/CHC there is effectively no data as we roam on the Vodafone network?
Like Mauricio, having used EDGE and 3G, for "regular" smartphone use the speed difference is barely noticeable. It certainly wouldn't prevent me hopping back to 2degrees anyway.
shk292:walt12: The only issue preventing me coming back to 2degrees now is data roaming. I assume that roaming is as it was before - ie outside of AKL/WLG/CHC there is effectively no data as we roam on the Vodafone network?
Like Mauricio, having used EDGE and 3G, for "regular" smartphone use the speed difference is barely noticeable. It certainly wouldn't prevent me hopping back to 2degrees anyway.
I've been on 2degrees for about 6 months and have been able to use data anywhere in the VF network ever since joining. The rates are the same as when on 2d own network. The only downside is VF is GPRS, whereas 2d is EDGE - noticeably faster as you note above
kyhwana2: Nice.. especially the 500txts to any network thing..
OTOH, $6/50MB is still more expensive than vodafone..
_____________________________________________________________________
I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies....
Linuxluver:
So $12 for 100MB on 2D is the same as 102MB on Vodafone.
So $24 for 200MB on 2D is cheaper than 200MB on Vodafone ($30)
so $48 for 400MB on 2D is cheaper than $310 on Vodafone for 400MB on the 100MB option and cheaper than $230 on VF for 400MB on the 200MB option.
But for monthly data PLANS, Vodafone are much cheaper - especially for 'large' amounts of data (Broadband Ultra for 4G for $79.95 / month + $10 for another 4GB if you need it)
langers1972: The only criticism I have of these add ons is the necessity to use within 30 days, would be so much better to have them last for the duration until they were used.
I can spot the obvious commercial reason for doing so but, as a very casual user, it is slightly annoying.
Regards,
Old3eyes
SteveON:
New Zealand has a lack of population
...
Lets give an example of population density per Km sq
New Zealand - 15.953
UK - 254.676
I have used this example because many people like to use the UK rates as an example, both countries have a similar size land. Now, because of our hilly landscape for the same population; NZ requires a significantly higher investment per person.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |