Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


GoneTomorrow

31 posts

Geek
Inactive user


#128989 30-Aug-2013 20:39
Send private message

So I got my new Snap! VDSL install all done yesterday (Thursday). Took some convincing since my ADSL attenuation was 16 dB with a sync of 12Mbps. Here's my stats on the new VDSL, and my line length is at least 800m if I drew a straight line to the nearest cabinet:







Just a few questions: The chorus tech didn't run a dedicated cable to the VDSL jack from the filter in the ETP, but used an unused pair in the existing Cat 5 phone wiring. I'm 99% sure this is fine given the VDSL only uses 6MHz of bandwidth while the Cat 5 is rated for 100MHz.

He also just repurposed an existing BT phone jack because that wall plate also has a coaxial TV outlet and he wasn't equipped to deal with this. As such I am using an untwisted 1.5M BT to RJ11 cable. I would prefer to use a UTP Ethernet patch cable, but how much of a difference is this likely to make?

Overall though I am fairly happy with the performance of my VDSL, and it's been rock solid since it first came up (Haven't had any DLM resets yet though oddly enough, it's been up for 33 hours)

Cheers

Create new topic
Inphinity
2780 posts

Uber Geek


  #887209 30-Aug-2013 20:51
Send private message

Just a few questions: The chorus tech didn't run a dedicated cable to the VDSL jack from the filter in the ETP, but used an unused pair in the existing Cat 5 phone wiring. I'm 99% sure this is fine given the VDSL only uses 6MHz of bandwidth while the Cat 5 is rated for 100MHz.

He also just repurposed an existing BT phone jack because that wall plate also has a coaxial TV outlet and he wasn't equipped to deal with this. As such I am using an untwisted 1.5M BT to RJ11 cable. I would prefer to use a UTP Ethernet patch cable, but how much of a difference is this likely to make?


Mine is using existing cat3 from the splitter to the jack, and a regular 1.8m BT to Rj11 cable from jack to router, and I sync at ~62Mbps, so I don't imagine it should make too much difference.



chevrolux
4962 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #887223 30-Aug-2013 21:34
Send private message

The cable from the cabinet (in the ground) is cat3 or less. A 1.5m line cord will not make a sod of difference.

Lorenceo
904 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #887662 1-Sep-2013 00:52
Send private message

My word. You get that at 800 metres? Colour me green. :(



michaelmurfy
meow
13240 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #887663 1-Sep-2013 00:54
Send private message

800m if drawn as a straight line, and I know from experience the cable normally doesn't go straight there.

Heck, in the past I've seen an install appear to be 200m from the cabinet but the cable circled the block meaning 900m in the end.




Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)

Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


Lorenceo
904 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #887666 1-Sep-2013 01:38
Send private message

Yeah, if it's 800m as the crow flies it'll be even longer. My line is about 850M and I get 20/3.7mb :(

SamF
1578 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #887697 1-Sep-2013 08:53
Send private message

@gonetomorrow: That is an extraordinarily good result for a line with 15db attenuation! In addition, the version of firmware you are running defaults to a +1db SNRM modification, and since you are already on DLM1 and your error rate is so low, there is still a lot of room to further tweak your connection.

After your initial 10 day validation period, I would be inclined to try some SNRM tweaking, I wouldn't be surprised if you could achieve a 50Mbit sync.

Note that the firmware you are running is more difficult to mod the SNRM on. There is a method using telnet documented a few pages back but we are working on an easier way as well.

GoneTomorrow

31 posts

Geek
Inactive user


  #888298 2-Sep-2013 13:47
Send private message

Weird thing is that I started on DLM-1, and I haven't had a single resync since it was first connected (~100 hours). So I'm not sure if I'm even on the validation period, but I guess it could be that it hasn't had any reason to change.

Also, I believe there's room for improvement in the underground cable, as the U/G going to my house actually first goes past to a shed at the back, up into a jack-box where it's gel'd to a second cable that then goes back to the house ETP. My main concern is interference from a bench grinder that's near the box where the cables join. There's enough cable there to run straight to my ETP, removing a few metres and a join. I'm just a bit paranoid about disturbing the cable; the excess is stuffed in a loop that's been there for a few years. I'd hate to unravel it and have the insulation split or conductors break...

 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
GoneTomorrow

31 posts

Geek
Inactive user


  #894891 12-Sep-2013 19:16
Send private message

Interesting thing, my line had been up since the very first connection with the results in the OP. Now, I just had a resync due to losing power for 3 days (dat wind) and I'm now looking at this:



I've netted an extra 3Mbps for nothing, which I guess is the result of the lower SNRM (10 now). What would cause this to change?

Xternal
24 posts

Geek


  #894946 12-Sep-2013 20:52
Send private message

Crosstalk is reduced during power cuts when everyones dsl syncs are down.

When the power first comes back on your line would have been very clean resulting in an above average sync, SNR would have dropped from 12 to 10 as more connections coming back online increasing the amount of crosstalk present.

GoneTomorrow

31 posts

Geek
Inactive user


  #894985 12-Sep-2013 22:13
Send private message

Could be, but I don't think anyone else is on the line. The nearest house is probably a good couple of KM away.

The other thing I thought of was that the first sync occurred while the chorus tech was still punching down pairs, so I was thinking it could be that as well. I might do another resync soonish to confirm.

mikenzb
371 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #894992 12-Sep-2013 22:37
Send private message

Hey if your line is stable and getting a faster sync then before...

I would just leave it alone....

Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.