I see cloud providers in NZ charging as much as dedicated server co-location. Cloud is considerably cheaper in the US and also service levels which NZ providers can't offer (or try and market as premium) are standard there.
I see cloud providers in NZ charging as much as dedicated server co-location. Cloud is considerably cheaper in the US and also service levels which NZ providers can't offer (or try and market as premium) are standard there.
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hardware is more expensive here, plus the economies of scale...
“Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose.” Douglas Adams
Referral links to services I use, really like, and may be rewarded if you sign up:
PocketSmith for budgeting and personal finance management. A great Kiwi company.
Dynamic:
Hardware is more expensive here, plus the economies of scale...
Don't forget power is more expensive too. And space, and bandwidth, and labour...
Do you have some examples? I find most people with this argument are not comparing apples with apples properly.
-------------------------
bruce.trevarthen.nz
btrevarthen:
Do you have some examples? I find most people with this argument are not comparing apples with apples properly.
There is a 101+ offers and I am too busy to trawl through them to make a point. I understand more then amply to know like-for-like there is a significant price difference. Actually, the US based providers commonly offer better specs and a considerably cheaper price. As a rough guideline, what costs $150 - 200 or more per month is about US$50 there.
SLA's are also considerably better. 24/7 tech support is standard, not something not offered or something one would feel reluctant to call someone at home late at night.
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
There is also a question of where the provider is actually hosting infrastructure. You see re-sellers of 365 that came from Singapore and now Australia (If requested as 365 locate the services to provide better connection to the end user) You may also find that cloud backup providers are shipping the data off to AWS and Azure in Australia too. The term cloud is useless to describe the specific service you're after too, its in essence an off-site service. Cloud backup is just Backups located on somebody elses hardware in a location you don't control.
Rivera Apollo is Azure compatible and is comparably priced to Azure run by Microsoft. Nowhere near the features of flexibility of AWS, but good enough, runs Windows or Linux, and it's in data center that runs government systems so it's pretty good.
timmmay:
Rivera Apollo is Azure compatible and is comparably priced to Azure run by Microsoft. Nowhere near the features of flexibility of AWS, but good enough, runs Windows or Linux, and it's in data center that runs government systems so it's pretty good.
How can their v-DaaS offer Client OS's I'm sure that MS has yet to give DaaS Providers the licencing to offer this.
Cloud has become a buzzword, so unfortunately too many times providers stretch the term far too far. In my book if it doesn't have an API so you can automatize the management of resources, have a pay as you go pricing and don't mind if you have just one bucket or hundreds of servers they are not different that VPS providers that were all the rage in 2006.
pbgben:
How can their v-DaaS offer Client OS's I'm sure that MS has yet to give DaaS Providers the licencing to offer this.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
marpada:
Cloud has become a buzzword, so unfortunately too many times providers stretch the term far too far. In my book if it doesn't have an API so you can automatize the management of resources, have a pay as you go pricing and don't mind if you have just one bucket or hundreds of servers they are not different that VPS providers that were all the rage in 2006.
In my case I am only looking for a Linux VPS service.
WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers
MichaelNZ:
marpada:
Cloud has become a buzzword, so unfortunately too many times providers stretch the term far too far. In my book if it doesn't have an API so you can automatize the management of resources, have a pay as you go pricing and don't mind if you have just one bucket or hundreds of servers they are not different that VPS providers that were all the rage in 2006.
In my case I am only looking for a Linux VPS service.
Some companies are now using the term cloud for anything related to hosting I have found.
The topic should have been why is VPS hosting so expensive in NZ. It has been pretty much answered. I do agree with you that it is pricey, however it isn't exactly cheap overseas with some providers either I have found. But you do get what you pay for in terms of reliability and support.
MichaelNZ:
In my case I am only looking for a Linux VPS service.
Does it have to be in New Zealand? If so, why? Sydney has heaps of providers (AWS, Azure, and a few others mentioned in another thread recently), it's 34ms away (if routed correctly), and you can use the free tier of the CloudFlare CDN to make things super fast.
comes down to bandwidth price
i know a few companies charge more for servers in NZ and AU than in USA or EU
biggal:
comes down to bandwidth price
i know a few companies charge more for servers in NZ and AU than in USA or EU
AWS does that, they say it reflects their costs. A decent spec server costs 40% more in Sydney than the USA, 1TB of outgoing bandwidth costs 58% more. Each region is different.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |