![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
ALARMNZ: ZEON
We are talking about old house cable here ....you know OLD TELEPHONE CABLE not Cat5/6 !! but the cable installed prior to the 1990?s ( single pair)
Most home owners will not get 100Mbps from Old home telephone cable unless its Cat5/6 ( new Cable)
What I am saying here is 802.11n/g wireless (Wifi) is the most economical solution where the existing cable is not up to standard. When Wifi is used home owners can achieve between 25-35Mbps speed with is perfectly suitable to stream HDTV in fact some new TVs have this option built-in
So if you or anybody can top 55Mbps (802.11n/g wireless) using Old telephone cable and do it for less than $100..... then stand up and show us ( VDSL/SHDSL does not qualify)
Lets see it.
Cymro:
Sorry, I think you are spectacularly missing the point.
How does the DSL service get to the WiFi router/device in the first place? Via the house wiring.
What does the SDP "product" do? Replaces the house wiring between the ETP and a new combined splitter/jackpoint/hub which is the physical SDP box.
ALARMNZ:Cymro:
Sorry, I think you are spectacularly missing the point.
How does the DSL service get to the WiFi router/device in the first place? Via the house wiring.
What does the SDP "product" do? Replaces the house wiring between the ETP and a new combined splitter/jackpoint/hub which is the physical SDP box.
Yes THAT’S RIGHT !! I am spectacularly missing the point of this SDP particulary the cost justification of the device and what beats me is why anyone with a simple understanding of home networking would go along with it.
Why should a home owner spend $200 in a splitter when they can buy one from DSE for $29
http://www.dse.com.au/cgi-bin/dse.storefront/4c79978100983ac8273fc0a87e0106d5/Product/View/F2431
This SDP does not “do” anything If CHORUS wants to tidy up the Home broadband demarcation point then that’s great but its years too late.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |